- Joined
- Jun 12, 2007
- Messages
- 4,815 (0.74/day)
- Location
- Wangas, New Zealand
System Name | Darth Obsidious |
---|---|
Processor | Intel i5 2500K |
Motherboard | ASUS P8Z68-V/Gen3 |
Cooling | Cooler Master Hyper 212+ in Push Pull |
Memory | 2X4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 |
Video Card(s) | ASUS R9 270x TOP |
Storage | 128GB Samsung 830 SSD, 1TB WD Black, 2TB WD Green |
Display(s) | LG IPS234V-PN |
Case | Corsair Obsidian 650D |
Audio Device(s) | Infrasonic Quartet |
Power Supply | Corsair HX650w |
Software | Windows 7 64bit and Windows XP Home |
Benchmark Scores | 2cm mark on bench with a razor blade. |
I have always been confused about the texture qualities and which is the best.
For instance in game settings we have say Linear, Bi-Linear, Tri-Linear and Anisotropic Filtering.
That may not be all either...
Every time I have change the setting I have not noticed any difference except for performance.
I know that in Need for Speed Carbon, Bi Linear makes the game perform the best but thats about it.
Can any people list which one has the best quality from best at the top to worse at the bottom plus what the visual differences are?
For instance in game settings we have say Linear, Bi-Linear, Tri-Linear and Anisotropic Filtering.
That may not be all either...
Every time I have change the setting I have not noticed any difference except for performance.
I know that in Need for Speed Carbon, Bi Linear makes the game perform the best but thats about it.
Can any people list which one has the best quality from best at the top to worse at the bottom plus what the visual differences are?