Thank you for your answers. Values smaller than -140 mV are ignored as a result of observation.These voltages are linked. The CPU ignores your request if you only adjust one of these.
Anything beyond appropriately-220 mV is ignored by the core.
No one knows why. Intel does not share their secrets. Be happy you can adjust these individually. XTU does not allow this. Test with Cinebench R20. It does make a difference.
Were you testing with Cinebench R20? Modern software that heavily uses the AVX instruction set will benefit most from using different voltages. Older software like Cinebench R15 will show little to no benefit.Values smaller than -140 mV are ignored as a result of observation.
How about synced? No one knows the exact relationship between these two voltages. There are no books that clearly explain what is going on. Intel XTU forces these two voltages to always be set equally even though the CPU contains two separate registers to store voltage information for the core and cache. What has been learned is that many users testing Intel's 8th, 9th and 10th Gen mobile processors get better performance and/or better temperatures by setting the core to a bigger number compared to the cache. The benefits in Cinebench R20 seem to level out somewhere around -220 mV.to have a voltage "linked".
Your results speak for themselves. Better performance and better temps is a win win situation. Post your final voltages so others can learn what needs to be done.power consumption decreased from 125W to 115W.
Intel I7-10875H ProcessorPost your final voltages so others can learn what needs to be done.