DRAM-Less Testing

The weakness of DRAM-less SSDs is random write with relatively small block sizes over large areas. We tested this by sending random 4K block-sized writes to a file of varying size to control the locality of the writes, which should put different levels of stress on the flash translation layer and reveal additional structure.



As expected for a DRAM-less drive, random write IOPS starts out very high with closely localized accesses. As we increase the test size, a constant linear drop is observed until around 7 GB, which is probably the controller's internal memory. Beyond that, another curve segment emerges, linear too, but steeper, until 11 GB. A third and final curve starts at 12 GB and goes all the way to 120 GB, gradually decreasing in performance.



Compared to other DRAM-less SSDs, the SX6000 Pro does well, beating all of them until up to 18 GB or so, which is when the WD Blue NVMe takes the lead.

IO Latency

In this section, we take a closer look at the IO latencies of our SSDs, which helps quantify the time it takes for a data transfer to travel through the OS and to the SSD controller, get executed, and report its completion back to the application. The numbers presented are the 99th percentile, recording an upper latency limit (=worst case) you can expect from the drive with the given IO load. The 99th percentile was chosen to eliminate outliers caused by random events, like OS processor scheduling and background processes using up CPU time. Latency is an important factor for enterprise sectors that need to achieve certain quality-of-service levels, but ends up playing an important role to us enthusiasts as well. Our goal here is to identify bottlenecks in the controller or flash cell erase process.

Mixed Accesses Patterns

Our final synthetic test workload examines IO performance with various mixed read/write ratios. On the horizontal axis, we start with a 100% read (0% write) operation on the left, moving through various read/write ratios until we reach 100% write (0% read) on the right. The 99% ratio values are especially important data points here since it's rare to only send read or write operations to a drive. It is much more common to have reads and writes interspaced in between, one source of which is disk "noise" created by the operating system or background programs. The other read/write ratios are useful because they help determine the performance you can expect from various application scenarios.