Friday, December 31st 2010

AMD Mobility Radeon HD 7000 Series Reality by Q4-2011

Shortly after finishing off the top-order of its Radeon HD 6000 series desktop discrete graphics processors (GPUs), AMD is letting out information about its first line of GPUs built on the 28 nanometer fabrication process. The first products carrying the Mobility Radeon HD 7000 series brand identifiers are notebook GPUs in the MXM 3.0 form-factor. AMD is planning an entire lineup top-to-bottom to address almost all mobile computing market segments. At the very low end of course would be its Fusion accelerated processing units with GPUs embedded. On top of that is what follows.

The lineup begins with "Wimbledon", an ultra high-end mGPU. It has a 256-bit wide high-speed GDDR5 memory interface, 2-4 GB of dedicated memory, and 65W TDP. The DirectX 11 GPU will be about 25% faster than "Blackcomb", the Mobility HD 6000 series flagship. This is slated for Q2-2012. Next up is the high-end "Heathrow" mGPU, which has a 192-bit or 128-bit (selectable between variants) GDDR5 memory interface, 1-3 GB of dedicated memory, up to 45W TDP, and 30% higher performance compared to "Chelsea". This is slated for Q4-2011 (this should tell you that Radeon HD 7000 series will be in existence towards the end of 2011).

Going down, there's "Chelsea" itself, with its 128-bit GDDR5 memory interface, 1-2 GB memory, 20-30W TDP, performance 30% higher than "Whistler", production starting in Q4-2011. Lastly, there's "Thames". This mainstream mGPU will have 128-bit GDDR5 with option of GDDR3, 1 GB memory, 15-20W TDP, and 100% higher performance than "Seymour", Radeon HD 6000 series' mainstream mGPU. Production for this starts in Q4-2011, as well.
Source: DonanimHaber
Add your own comment

37 Comments on AMD Mobility Radeon HD 7000 Series Reality by Q4-2011

#26
Hayder_Master
bear jesusI can't wait to see what AMD and Nvidia will be doing with the 28nm fabrication process :D



If it uses 6GHz effective GDDR5 would you really expect that to be a bottleneck on a mobile part?

I'm not sure how to do the math but I'm sure that's around/over 200gb/s but also Hynix has made GDDR5 chips that can run at 7GHz effective speed, how many hundreds of gb/s bandwidth is enough? :p
cdawallman its terrible 256 bit GDDR5 is so slow in comparison to what 512 bit GDDR3? oh w2ait no those are the same. current cards are not having bandwidth issues esp on the notebook side of things...
wahdangunits non issue, because its laptop so it need to be as efficient as it can be
so what about the Success with nvidia cards, they gonna use more then 256bit
ok lets say high memory speed from ATI and more wide memory bandwidth from nvidia it give same frequency, but question who give more heat and who will more effective ????
Posted on Reply
#27
Rexter
entropy13No "HD" though. That's why they thought of that new prefix first starting with the 2xxx series, for this inevitability.
You are no fun :(
Posted on Reply
#28
Unregistered
hayder.masterso what about the Success with nvidia cards, they gonna use more then 256bit
ok lets say high memory speed from ATI and more wide memory bandwidth from nvidia it give same frequency, but question who give more heat and who will more effective ????
hmm isn't GTX260 was SLOWER than HD 4870 despite having wider bus ???? or HD 5870/6870 vs GTX 470,
#29
Swamp Monster
RexterHey guys! I have exclusive new photos of the 7000 series!
I think there will be people seeling these things in ebay. And I think that some unlucky people will buy them too, because of overlooking.
Posted on Reply
#30
OneCool
That would be very funny :roll:


Why does my 7500 only have a pci slot?It doesnt fit in my PCIE slot?
Posted on Reply
#31
entropy13
Confusion would be highly unlikely (although possible, considering that there are stupid consumers) as there were only three cards in that series, the 7000, the 7200 and the 7500, i.e. quite distinct from the numbering in place today.
Posted on Reply
#32
Steevo
Their evil wizzard back then told them this day would come, so they different names then.
Posted on Reply
#33
mysticjon
wish they would stop taking technology from the rosewell spacecraft and slowly making it look like theres progress on the techfront. Just fucking get the lightsabers, starfleet grade phase pistols and warp speed spacecrafts on the go already, jesus fuck what are we wating for!!! amd intel my ass. in the future days of techwars, its gunna boil down to 2 main contenders, google and disney lol
Posted on Reply
#34
Hayder_Master
wahdangunhmm isn't GTX260 was SLOWER than HD 4870 despite having wider bus ???? or HD 5870/6870 vs GTX 470,
first u comparing dd3 vs ddr5 now all of them are ddr5, other thing i think u miss reviews gtx260 was better than 4870 almost in all benches.
Posted on Reply
#35
KainXS
most newer mobility cards use GDDR5 and @256bit that is comparable to 512bit GDDR3, memory bandwidth is a double edged sword for notebooks, the more you have, the more rops you need and the more rops the more power and heat the gpu needs/generates

the 2900XT is a good example of this gone wrong, that card was a complete mess late in its life

and most of the time the GTX260 was faster than the HD4870 in actual gaming
Posted on Reply
#36
wolf
Performance Enthusiast
hayder.masterfirst u comparing dd3 vs ddr5 now all of them are ddr5, other thing i think u miss reviews gtx260 was better than 4870 almost in all benches.
for the most part yes, the 192sp model was roughly par with the 4870 and the 216sp model was slightly ahead
KainXSand most of the time the GTX260 was faster than the HD4870 in actual gaming
ditto on what i said above.

A mobilty card with 256-bit GDDR5 will assumedly be a fantastic performer, hec a 5770 isnt bottlenecked by 128-bit GDDR5 and the juniper based mobility chips are already a heap of power on the go.
Posted on Reply
#37
Hayder_Master
wolffor the most part yes, the 192sp model was roughly par with the 4870 and the 216sp model was slightly ahead
+1, the 192sp was better than 4870 with 512mb and the 216sp better than 4870 with 1g
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 4th, 2024 11:40 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts