Friday, February 18th 2011

Intel 510 Series SATA 6 Gb/s SSD Slated for March 1

One of consumer SSD's pioneers, Intel, is expected to launch its next-generation 510 series solid state drive (SSD) in the 2.5-inch SATA form factor on March 1, 2011. The Intel 510 series is targeted at PC enthusiasts, workstations, and high-end notebooks. It uses the latest 6 Gb/s SATA specification, and make use of 34 nm MLC NAND flash chips. The drives can dole out transfer rates of up to 470 MB/s read, and 315 MB/s write. It delivers 20,000 IOPS random 4K read, and 5,000 IOPS random 4K write performance. At least initially, it will be available in only two capacities, 120 GB and 250 GB, priced at around US $366 and $767, respectively.
Source: VR-Zone
Add your own comment

34 Comments on Intel 510 Series SATA 6 Gb/s SSD Slated for March 1

#1
DoomDoomDoom
120 GB for $366?

No thanks. I don't care that it's SATA 6, that's pretty high, even for a SSD.
Posted on Reply
#3
Loosenut
Expensive? No, it's Intel...
Posted on Reply
#4
Fishymachine
3$ a Gig,and for that kind of random read/writes :shadedshu
Posted on Reply
#5
LAN_deRf_HA
So it loses in IOPS and sequential to the new sandforce. Maybe it will fair better in real world tests, or be priced competitively.
Posted on Reply
#6
Hayder_Master
DoomDoomDoom120 GB for $366?

No thanks. I don't care that it's SATA 6, that's pretty high, even for a SSD.
OCZ revo drive pci-e, 540 read/480 write +120g = around 300$

so f**k intel
Posted on Reply
#7
Flibolito
hayder.masterOCZ revo drive pci-e, 540 read/480 write 120g = around 300$
yup!
Posted on Reply
#8
krisna159
holly crap... :eek:... i want it but i just have $10 in my wallet... :banghead::banghead:
Posted on Reply
#9
Swamp Monster
hayder.masterocz revo drive pci-e, 540 read/480 write 120g = around 300$

so f**k intel
+1
Posted on Reply
#10
v12dock
Block Caption of Rainey Street
No thanks, time for SF-2000 to be released
Posted on Reply
#11
MikeMurphy
I do like Intel reliability but that's a bit expensive...
Posted on Reply
#12
Breathless
The prices are supposed to be going down as quality / technology increases with SSD's. What are they thinking?
Posted on Reply
#13
Lu(ky
Two words Crucial C400
Posted on Reply
#14
alucasa
Intel needs to wake up (again). They are getting delusional that whatever they produce is the best of the best and therefore requires a hefty premium.

Someone (Namely AMD) need to take their crown away and slap them few times so that they can wake up.
Posted on Reply
#18
madrooster
Those prices quoted are what an e-tailer in Europe has set for preorder. The real price for the 120GB is $280.. click the vr-zone link.
Posted on Reply
#19
Unregistered
Guys! I mean relax. If you are retarded enough to pay 1000$ for an Intel CPU which is marginally faster, or not at all, than a similar performance one at 300$ (still to darn expensive), you will be idiotic enough to buy those craps, even if there are cheaper, faster and bigger alternatives out there!
Jeez. Those prices made me LOLed! haha!
Posted on Edit | Reply
#20
Completely Bonkers
I'm sure that Intel is "advertising the product" but misleading with the price. On availability, I bet it will be much cheaper... and the competition will be caught off-guard. Or at least, let's hope so!
Posted on Reply
#21
Mega-Japan
Holy Intel what? I guess I'll be waiting another year or two to make the move to SSD...
Posted on Reply
#22
Thefumigator
I won't be moving to SSD at all... Tons of writes on a dialy basis would kill them too fast on my case.

I only rely on speed using normal HDDs in RAID. I own 3 in RAID 0 since 2007 and for what I payed, I'm pretty happy with them. So far zero failure. It happened to me once that the thing didn't want to boot, but it was caused by a loose sata cable.
Posted on Reply
#23
TurdFergasun
i'm sure ppl felt the same way about tape drives, and gramophones at one point in time.
Posted on Reply
#24
Thefumigator
TurdFergasuni'm sure ppl felt the same way about tape drives, and gramophones at one point in time.
I believe in the future of SSD, but still I can't rely on SSD for their lifespan dropping seriously when writes get about most of you use it for, in a daily basis, unless of course, this is going to be improved somehow in the future.

Not that I like old hardware or I don't trust the new tecnologies... But now that you mention tape drives... :rockout:
Posted on Reply
#25
15th Warlock
SSD prices were supposed to go down this gen, but it seems everyone is driving prices up :(

First we have OCZ bamboozling consumers by selling 25nm Vertex 2 drives the same price as the 34nm drives, only for end users to find out that their drives have lower capacity after format and worst performance than the 34nm parts, and OCZ is laughing all the to the bank, 25nm not only is cheaper to manufacture, but is also expected to be less reliable than 34nm NAND.

Then Sandforce 2X00 drives are expected to sell at insane prices, I know all previews are from enterprise drives, but it's expected that consumer versions will retail at same or even higher prices than current SF offerings at the same capacity.

The only player left is Crucial, I read rumors that the C400 should cost around $210 for the 120GBs version for 1000 drives, but Corsair already is selling their 128GB version of the C400 at $319 at Newegg, so things are looking grim on that front as well, I guess retailers will see the lack of real price competition, and sell these drives at insane markups... :shadedshu

What happened to 25nm bringing prices down? Not only are the main players staying away from 25nm NAND for reliability and performance issues, but also, the few 25nm offerings currently available sell at the same or higher prices than 34nm parts.

This is not good indeed, I pity the fools who will preorder these drives at that price :shadedshu

And I was really looking forward to moving to SSDs this year with the rumored price drops and enhanced reliability, seems like I'll wait another year, this is madness :p
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 25th, 2024 03:07 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts