Friday, August 13th 2021

AMD Ryzen 5 5600G APU Die Shots Published

We have recently seen the first high-resolution die shots of AMD's Ryzen 5 5600G Cezanne APU thanks to the work of Fritzchens Fritz. The photos show the internal layout of the processor with its Zen 3 CPU, Vega GPU, and corresponding components. To get these shots, the chip had to be delidded by removing the IHS which has been made harder with the move to a soldered design. The Ryzen 5 5600G is a 6 core, 12 thread part with 7 Vega GPU cores which can all be seen in the annotated diagram of the die created by Locuza. The diagram also shows the suspected locations of various PCIe 3.0, and memory controllers along with cache placements for the CPU and GPU. The processor is manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process and features a total of 10.7 Billion transistors packed into the 180 mm² die.
Sources: Fritzchens Fritz, @Locuza_
Add your own comment

31 Comments on AMD Ryzen 5 5600G APU Die Shots Published

#26
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
Vayra86Still counting 8 cores though and not 6.

Also an 8th vega in there, btw
That's because both the 5600G and 5700G use the same 8 core die.
Chrispy_Plenty of proof showing that more CUs would give more performance. Sure, DDR4 bandwidth sucks, but the limitation of current IGPs is still the lack of CUs. Additionally, we're now at the point where AMD's APUs support 3600MHz+ RAM speeds, and 1st-gen Zen APUs were struggling to get beyond 2666MHz until several AGESA revisions later. There's 35% more bandwidth to feed 35% more CUs right there from IMC and DDR4 speeds alone!
At this point, I'd rather see them dump Vega cores entirely and switch to RDNA2 cores on their processors. It really boggles my mind why they are still using GCN cores and not at least RDNA 1, or preferably RDNA 2 cores.
Posted on Reply
#27
Chrispy_
Vayra86I think we shouldnt omit the idea that AMD now has a competitive GPU line up again. They arent directly looking for APUs that cannibalize on that.
Hahah, there's no risk of Vega8 cannbalising 6600XT sales. The performance difference is more than an order of magnitude, right?

AMD could triple the performance of their IGP and there'd still be no overlap with their dGPUs.
Posted on Reply
#28
Jism
The IGP is perfect for 2D work and some occasional games. But as long as DDR4 still is a limitation or HBM is'nt added on-die the performance will just like always be crippled. The Vega is a succes tho due to it's efficiency. Not the Vega II obviously. But in smaller quantities in relation of cores its a very efficient chip.
Posted on Reply
#29
Nephilim666
New Category of product:
HEDT CPU with very high power delivery (400-500W) in STRX4 socket. only 16 CPU cores but full RDNA2 (or newer) die and 16GB HBM.
Only high end watercooling need apply.
Posted on Reply
#30
Chrispy_
Nephilim666New Category of product:
HEDT CPU with very high power delivery (400-500W) in STRX4 socket. only 16 CPU cores but full RDNA2 (or newer) die and 16GB HBM.
Only high end watercooling need apply.
That sounds uncoolable and has zero economic viability. If you have an STRX4 socket and 400-500W or cooling you also have enough PCIe lanes and physical space to throw 8 RDNA2 cards at it, completely outclassing this hypothetical products sole niche by a factor of 8, probably at a much lower performance/$ too.
Posted on Reply
#31
olstyle
I'd even take out more CUs and primarily update the multimedia engine.
The gamer IGP is what will be build into the Steam Deck. This here was always planned as a fast CPU for work which can put out an 2D image without an dedicated GPU. And for that the GPU part is still too big while lacking fixed function decoding for AV1 and high resolution output via HDMI 2.1.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jun 3rd, 2024 13:23 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts