Tuesday, October 11th 2022

Intel Previews NUC 13 Extreme With Space for a Triple Slot GPU

We've been aware of Intel's upcoming NUC 13 Extreme—codenamed Raptor Canyon—since July this year, with the compute element module having leaked back in August. Now Intel has previewed the NUC 13 Extreme at TwitchCon and we have a better idea what the biggest NUC to date will look like. The chassis has a volume of no less than 13.9 litres, which is bigger than many Mini-ITX cases. The main reason for this is that the NUC 13 Extreme has enough space for a triple slot GPU, although if you're hoping to put a GeForce RTX 4090 inside, then you're out of luck, as it seems to be limited to the length of an RTX 3080 or thereabout. The compute modul appears to have changed somewhat from the early leak, or it's possible it just wasn't a very good render.

As we've known, Intel will be kitting out the NUC 13 Extreme with a range of CPU options and it was confirmed during the stream that it'll handle a "full" Core i9K without specifying which model. The Intel rep mentioned a highly optimised heatsink, which appears to be something along the lines of a modified GPU cooler with a blower cooler. This is because the compute module is largely the same shape and size as a graphics card. The chassis itself looks like a bit of a nightmare to deal with, as it has a lot of removable parts to allow access to the innards of the NUC 13 Extreme. The compute module has to be installed at an angle, or it won't fit inside the chassis, whereas the graphics card looks relatively easy to install. You can find the full video in the link below and it starts just past the four hour mark.
Source: Intel (on Twitch)
Add your own comment

26 Comments on Intel Previews NUC 13 Extreme With Space for a Triple Slot GPU

#1
P4-630
TheLostSwedeYou can find the full video in the link below
If you read this in the Forums news section, the intel link below isn't there.....
Posted on Reply
#2
TheLostSwede
News Editor
P4-630If you read this in the Forums news section, the intel link below isn't there.....
That's because the links are posted on the front page of the site, as always.
Posted on Reply
#3
P4-630
TheLostSwedeThat's because the links are posted on the front page of the site, as always.
I know, but it would be easy and nice if those links could be in the news forum as well if you read it there wouldn't it?
Posted on Reply
#4
TheLostSwede
News Editor
P4-630I know, but it would be easy and nice if those links could be in the news forum as well if you read it there wouldn't it?
Again, it's not my call.
We've had this discussion and mentioning on my posts over and over, isn't going to change anything.
If you have an issue, take it up with management.
Posted on Reply
#5
bonehead123
Hummm,,,,,, looks like yet ANUTHA intel-based clusterf*ck in the making :(

Also, whoever took those crappy pics needz to go back to hack-it slack it photog school :)
Posted on Reply
#6
mouacyk
wth are these picture qualities
Posted on Reply
#7
TheLostSwede
News Editor
mouacykwth are these picture qualities
It's from a very dark video stream. Did as well as I could.
Posted on Reply
#8
damric
Well at least they didn't put an Arc in it.
Posted on Reply
#9
jesdals
Good luck fitting an RTX 4090 in that thing :D
Posted on Reply
#10
darakian
I sorta got the prior gen high end nuc since you couldn't make anything that small, but this is larger than a lot of itx builds.
Posted on Reply
#11
Rahnak
The original idea was very appealing to me, but it seems like they abandoned it. Can you replace the CPU+Mobo unit of the previous one with this one? Wasn't that the whole point of the thing, being replaceable?
Posted on Reply
#12
Blueberries
After several iterations Intel has finally figured out how to make a mini-ITX computer.

Originally I thought the purpose of NUC was to fill the VESA-mounted niche space, but over the years I've grown more and more confused as to what the design goal was/is, at this point, I don't think Intel even knows.
Posted on Reply
#13
Chrispy_
Meh.
The point of NUC was density. Getting an entire system (using an IGP) into a half-litre brick was both useful and impressive:


This? No. It's just an expensive SFF that looks to be somewhere in the 7.5L-10L range. Unlike almost every other SFF at this size, the NUC 13 Extreme is almost assuredly fully proprietary, immensely expensive and probably has a woeful BIOS that lacks any kind of serious fan curve or CPU frequency/volume tuning. I've bought a bunch of regular, tiny NUCs based on the U-series chips, and a small handful of the NUC extremes just out of morbid curiousity with our research budget, so I'm familiar both with the mediocrity of Intel's in-house motherboards/BIOSes and also their downright abysmal software support for the lower-volume NUC Extremes.

You buy it only if you're a die-hard Intel fanboy who has to collect all the NUCs, IMO. It's functionally useless in the market given just how many alternatives exist without any of the downsides...
Posted on Reply
#14
zlobby
NUC? More like Nuke.
Posted on Reply
#15
Crackong
NUC used to be
┌─┐
└─┘
What they did
┌───┐
└───┘
What Now
┌───┐

└───┘
Posted on Reply
#16
thesmokingman
mouacykwth are these picture qualities
like low res tech porn from the 90s...
Posted on Reply
#17
dyonoctis
Chrispy_Meh.
The point of NUC was density. Getting an entire system (using an IGP) into a half-litre brick was both useful and impressive:


This? No. It's just an expensive SFF that looks to be somewhere in the 7.5L-10L range. Unlike almost every other SFF at this size, the NUC 13 Extreme is almost assuredly fully proprietary, immensely expensive and probably has a woeful BIOS that lacks any kind of serious fan curve or CPU frequency/volume tuning. I've bought a bunch of regular, tiny NUCs based on the U-series chips, and a small handful of the NUC extremes just out of morbid curiousity with our research budget, so I'm familiar both with the mediocrity of Intel's in-house motherboards/BIOSes and also their downright abysmal software support for the lower-volume NUC Extremes.

You buy it only if you're a die-hard Intel fanboy who has to collect all the NUCs, IMO. It's functionally useless in the market given just how many alternatives exist without any of the downsides...
it's 14 liters actually :D bigger than a DAN A4-H2O, and around the same as a meshilicious
Posted on Reply
#18
zlobby
thesmokingmanlike low res tech porn from the 90s...
What do you want? They were rendered on Arc! That's peak XeSS!
Posted on Reply
#19
trsttte
The "core" (the part with the cpu) uses a new format so I guess they're bringing their mobo socket/chipset bs to the the nuc devices

The "pcie" format of the previous one was kind of interesting, recently there were even dual systems built that way (used for marketing at least). This is just a more expensive and bigger sff now :(
Posted on Reply
#20
Hxx
this NUC device went from tiny, to small, to whatever this is Matx size. in a couple years intel will put out a full tower nuc extreme lmao.
Posted on Reply
#21
InVasMani
Can't tell if bigfoot or just bad picture.
Posted on Reply
#22
Valantar
So they made a NUC that's almost as big as my Meshlicious, has worse cooling compatibility, notably worse GPU compatibility, a much larger desk footprint, and seems notably more difficult to work in outside of the fact that the motherboard comes with the CPU and cooler already installed. ...good job?
Posted on Reply
#23
Chrispy_
dyonoctisit's 14 liters actually :D bigger than a DAN A4-H2O, and around the same as a meshilicious
Jesus, that's woeful.
Why did they even bother?
Posted on Reply
#24
Valantar
Chrispy_Jesus, that's woeful.
Why did they even bother?
Because they've seen how the SFF market has been growing and someone thought "hey, we make these tiny PCs, could we make an SFF gaming version of this?", and then proceeded to design a series of products that implemented exactly zero of the experience gathered by the SFF community and the designers operating within it over the past decade or so. There are plenty of ways in which this could have been good. Instead it's just mediocre and expensive.
Posted on Reply
#25
Jimmy_
it seems they have changed the reference from mini to Mini-ATX :D
just intel things
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jun 3rd, 2024 05:06 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts