• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Pentium Gold G5600 3.9 GHz

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,712 (3.97/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
A refresh of a refresh of a refresh. And yet, if you're building a system just for web browsing, this still beats every Ryzen out there. Not much of a market, but it's there.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
1,793 (0.46/day)
A refresh of a refresh of a refresh. And yet, if you're building a system just for web browsing, this still beats every Ryzen out there. Not much of a market, but it's there.

Intel igpus are quite good at video codec support, so in simple htpc for i.e. netflix 4k these things are enough. Though not those ~$90 ones. Cheapest one and celerons.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
540 (0.11/day)
$100 for a dual core is shameful in 2018.

Fun with numbers:
1. Given the same cache and similar clocks/HT/generation, doubling the number of cores on an Intel increases the price 2.33x.
eg The 7300 was $150 and the 7700x was $350.

2. Tripling the cores increase the price 3.5x which is also 2.33x(3/2).
eg. This for $100 and the 8700k for $350.

3. Quadrupling the cores SHOULD increase the price 4.66x
This means don't be surprised if the new 8 core launches for $466 if this little turd stays at $100.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2013
Messages
2,181 (0.51/day)
Location
Deez Nutz, bozo!
System Name Rainbow Puke Machine :D
Processor Intel Core i5-11400 (MCE enabled, PL removed)
Motherboard ASUS STRIX B560-G GAMING WIFI mATX
Cooling Corsair H60i RGB PRO XT AIO + HD120 RGB (x3) + SP120 RGB PRO (x3) + Commander PRO
Memory Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 2 x 8GB 3200MHz DDR4 C16
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX2060 Twin Fan 6GB GDDR6 (Stock)
Storage Corsair MP600 PRO 1TB M.2 PCIe Gen4 x4 SSD
Display(s) LG 29WK600-W Ultrawide 1080p IPS Monitor (primary display)
Case Corsair iCUE 220T RGB Airflow (White) w/Lighting Node CORE + Lighting Node PRO RGB LED Strips (x4).
Audio Device(s) ASUS ROG Supreme FX S1220A w/ Savitech SV3H712 AMP + Sonic Studio 3 suite
Power Supply Corsair RM750x 80 Plus Gold Fully Modular
Mouse Corsair M65 RGB FPS Gaming (White)
Keyboard Corsair K60 PRO RGB Mechanical w/ Cherry VIOLA Switches
Software Windows 11 Professional x64 (Update 23H2)
maybe you're just overthinking about how Intel is throwing their price around when AMD is beating them in both budget & mid range PC hardware market... I highly doubt we'll see a mainstream 8-core Intel processor for $460+ when AMD's top of the line 2nd gen Ryzen 7 goes for around US$300 a pop. In all honesty, with AMD now being competitive again & proven so, Intel won't be crazy enough to pull off such stunt & then throw some lame-ass PR response.
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,693 (3.70/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Wish we could have seen how well it compares to an ocerclocked 2200G at reasonable speed of... let's say 3.9
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/Ryzen_3_2200G_Vega_8/19.html
Numbers are in this review, easy to compare

so he ate that Ti bit from the graphs :)
fuuuuuuuuuuck.. how could I miss that. It has been like that for whole 2018 I think, and nobody ever mentioned it

People that buy basic CPU's like this aren't going to install a top tier GPU to game.
You have $x and can buy slow CPU + GTX 1080 Ti or fast CPU + GTX 1080. What would you choose?
 
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
34 (0.01/day)
I wouldn't bother with this crap... either a quad core ryzen or if you can spare the money, an i3 8100 are both infinitely better value at this point.

That said, the 4 thread ryzens are pretty weak, especially for quad cores, probably the combination of low frequency and the bad latency due to still being dual CCX.

PRETTY WEAK ??? Bad Latency ?? ryzen 2200G is SINGLE CCX, no latency across core with Powerfull GPU in 100$ price range,,

G5600 is not bad product but the price is only 5 dollar bellow 2200G
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
540 (0.11/day)
maybe you're just overthinking about how Intel is throwing their price around when AMD is beating them in both budget & mid range PC hardware market... I highly doubt we'll see a mainstream 8-core Intel processor for $460+ when AMD's top of the line 2nd gen Ryzen 7 goes for around US$300 a pop. In all honesty, with AMD now being competitive again & proven so, Intel won't be crazy enough to pull off such stunt & then throw some lame-ass PR response.

That being said, AMD has been better about doubling cores = double the price even with HEDT (ignoring the 1800x as it was akin to Intel's 8086k).

Intel seems to be consistently over a 2x margin on the mainstream and WAY higher than that on HEDT. Just compare a 7800x to a 7920x for example.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,712 (3.97/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
PRETTY WEAK ??? Bad Latency ?? ryzen 2200G is SINGLE CCX, no latency across core with Powerfull GPU in 100$ price range,,

G5600 is not bad product but the price is only 5 dollar bellow 2200G
I find it hard to believe AMD would do that for a single SKU. Got any sources for that?
That chip is also significantly slower at 3.2GHz. It will boost to 3.6, but not on all cores, whereas this one right here does 3.9 ootb.
Not sating one is necessarily better than the other, the choice still comes down to whether you need more CPU or IGP power, availability and the total cost of the platform around where you live.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,278 (6.02/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
I could see this as a decent blizzard budget gaming CPU for WoW, Diablo III, SC2, etc.,

Well yay a 2018 product that works well running a decade old games from a single developer.

Throwing money at your screen yet? :roll:

I find it hard to believe AMD would do that for a single SKU. Got any sources for that?
That chip is also significantly slower at 3.2GHz. It will boost to 3.6, but not on all cores, whereas this one right here does 3.9 ootb.
Not sating one is necessarily better than the other, the choice still comes down to whether you need more CPU or IGP power, availability and the total cost of the platform around where you live.

No, sorry. A few hundred mhz versus 2 additional physical cores isnt comparable. HT is not that much of an equalizer and the 2200G 2 core clocks are close enough.

Dual cores are simply past history and should be avoided, this Pentium is too weak and offers less on every workload.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
1,533 (0.40/day)
Location
Grunn
System Name Indis the Fair (cursed edition)
Processor 11900k 5.1/4.9 undervolted.
Motherboard MSI Z590 Unify-X
Cooling Heatkiller VI Pro, VPP755 V.3, XSPC TX360 slim radiator, 3xA12x25, 4x Arctic P14 case fans
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws V 2x16GB 4000 16-19-19 (b-die@3600 14-14-14 1.45v)
Video Card(s) EVGA 2080 Super Hybrid (T30-120 fan)
Storage 970EVO 1TB, 660p 1TB, WD Blue 3D 1TB, Sandisk Ultra 3D 2TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2546K, Dell P2417H
Case FD Define 7
Audio Device(s) DT770 Pro, Topping A50, Focusrite Scarlett 2i2, Røde VXLR+, Modmic 5
Power Supply Seasonic 860w Platinum
Mouse Razer Viper Mini, Odin Infinity mousepad
Keyboard GMMK Fullsize v2 (Boba U4Ts)
Software Win10 x64/Win7 x64/Ubuntu
PRETTY WEAK ??? Bad Latency ?? ryzen 2200G is SINGLE CCX, no latency across core with Powerfull GPU in 100$ price range,,

G5600 is not bad product but the price is only 5 dollar bellow 2200G
I agree that the 2200G shouldn't have the CCX issue, yet it performs even worse than the 1300X which is a bit strange to me.

And also a bit odd I find is how much the SMT gain is on the AMD parts.

I personally would be eyeing the 8/12 thread ryzens though or maybe the i3 8100 for gaming purposes. I am not convinced by iGPUs because of the increased expenditure on motherboard and memory, you can get decent dGPUs second hand for very good prices. But then again the 22/2400G are compellingly priced even if you buy a dGPU.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
14,048 (3.84/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Lenovo ThinkCentre
Processor AMD 5650GE
Motherboard Lenovo
Memory 32 GB DDR4
Display(s) AOC 24" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Mouse Lenovo
Keyboard Lenovo
Software W11 Pro 64 bit
You have $x and can buy slow CPU + GTX 1080 Ti or fast CPU + GTX 1080. What would you choose?
The fastest CPU (and most cores) with the best Integrated graphics I could afford. I gave up true gaming years ago so don't personally require a dedicated Graphics Card. ;)
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
540 (0.11/day)
I agree that the 2200G shouldn't have the CCX issue, yet it performs even worse than the 1300X which is a bit strange to me.

And also a bit odd I find is how much the SMT gain is on the AMD parts.

I personally would be eyeing the 8/12 thread ryzens though or maybe the i3 8100 for gaming purposes. I am not convinced by iGPUs because of the increased expenditure on motherboard and memory, you can get decent dGPUs second hand for very good prices. But then again the 22/2400G are compellingly priced even if you buy a dGPU.

The single ccx hits it in some tests as it has less cache. They do typically overclock better, though.
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
2,141 (0.53/day)
Location
Serbia
Processor Ryzen 5600
Motherboard X570 I Aorus Pro
Cooling Deepcool AG400
Memory HyperX Fury 2 x 8GB 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) RX 6700 10GB SWFT 309
Storage SX8200 Pro 512 / NV2 512
Display(s) 24G2U
Case NR200P
Power Supply Ion SFX 650
Mouse G703 (TTC Gold 60M)
Keyboard Keychron V1 (Akko Matcha Green) / Apex m500 (Gateron milky yellow)
Software W10
Dual cores are simply past history and should be avoided, this Pentium is too weak and offers less on every workload.
Dual cores still have a place in the market, but not at $95
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,712 (3.97/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
No, sorry. A few hundred mhz versus 2 additional physical cores isnt comparable. HT is not that much of an equalizer and the 2200G 2 core clocks are close enough.

Dual cores are simply past history and should be avoided, this Pentium is too weak and offers less on every workload.
Do we have benches showing 4 physical cores are actually faster than 2 cores + HT? So much faster than it can mitigate almost half a GHz worth of raw HP?
Sure 4 physical cores is ideal, but HT isn't automatically a performance bottleneck.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,278 (6.02/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
Do we have benches showing 4 physical cores are actually faster than 2 cores + HT? So much faster than it can mitigate almost half a GHz worth of raw HP?
Sure 4 physical cores is ideal, but HT isn't automatically a performance bottleneck.

Lack of cores = stutterfest. Its the reason a quad no longer cuts it for high refresh either; other processes interfere with the game load. On a dual core that effect is much stronger - game engines can fully utilize not one core, but up to four these days and HT only works when that is not the case.

Benches dont run things in the background. At the same time 3.4-3.6 Ghz is more than fine for 30-60fps gaming. You only need the higher clocks for high refresh which is not what these products are aiming for at all.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
3,099 (0.93/day)
Location
Argentina
System Name Ciel / Akane
Processor AMD Ryzen R5 5600X / Intel Core i3 12100F
Motherboard Asus Tuf Gaming B550 Plus / Biostar H610MHP
Cooling ID-Cooling 224-XT Basic / Stock
Memory 2x 16GB Kingston Fury 3600MHz / 2x 8GB Patriot 3200MHz
Video Card(s) Gainward Ghost RTX 3060 Ti / Dell GTX 1660 SUPER
Storage NVMe Kingston KC3000 2TB + NVMe Toshiba KBG40ZNT256G + HDD WD 4TB / NVMe WD Blue SN550 512GB
Display(s) AOC Q27G3XMN / Samsung S22F350
Case Cougar MX410 Mesh-G / Generic
Audio Device(s) Kingston HyperX Cloud Stinger Core 7.1 Wireless PC
Power Supply Aerocool KCAS-500W / Gigabyte P450B
Mouse EVGA X15 / Logitech G203
Keyboard VSG Alnilam / Dell
Software Windows 11
The APUs are a single CCX, the rest of the space is used for the GPU. But the advantage of less latency is mitigated by the reduced cache.
Both the first R3 Ryzen and the APUs can be nicely overclocked to 4GHz on the stock heatsink.

Lack of cores = stutterfest. Its the reason a quad no longer cuts it for high refresh either; other processes interfere with the game load. On a dual core that effect is much stronger - game engines can fully utilize not one core, but up to four these days and HT only works when that is not the case.

Benches dont run things in the background. At the same time 3.4-3.6 Ghz is more than fine for 30-60fps gaming. You only need the higher clocks for high refresh which is not what these products are aiming for at all.

I always have few processes on the background, mostly just the drivers interfaces, so that depends per user, that makes a quad core enough for normal gaming. I supose a normal Windows 10 Home/Pro installation is a lot more bloated.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2018
Messages
427 (0.17/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard MSI B550 Tomahawk
Cooling Noctua U12S
Memory 32GB @ 3600 CL18
Video Card(s) AMD 6800XT
Storage WD Black SN850(1TB), WD Black NVMe 2018(500GB), WD Blue SATA(2TB)
Display(s) Samsung Odyssey G9
Case Be Quiet! Silent Base 802
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME-GX-1000
A refresh of a refresh of a refresh. And yet, if you're building a system just for web browsing, this still beats every Ryzen out there. Not much of a market, but it's there.

If someone were to buy a CPU for only web browsing, this is not the CPU they should be getting(see G4560 for $55). I'd also like to point out that for browsing, any CPU is acceptable on the list, as no one would actually notice the difference between the fastest CPU in Mozilla Kraken @ 916.9ms verses the slowest @ 1349.9. The difference between those is a entire 0.4 seconds.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,712 (3.97/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Lack of cores = stutterfest. Its the reason a quad no longer cuts it for high refresh either; other processes interfere with the game load. On a dual core that effect is much stronger - game engines can fully utilize not one core, but up to four these days and HT only works when that is not the case.

Benches dont run things in the background. At the same time 3.4-3.6 Ghz is more than fine for 30-60fps gaming. You only need the higher clocks for high refresh which is not what these products are aiming for at all.
So no proof, mostly guess work ;)
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
166 (0.03/day)
The only thing I'm surprised about is the absence of any talk about power consumption in the summary. I know motherboards can affect that a lot, but that's why you guys measure CPU-only consumption. While this particular CPU is too expensive, it looks like there's a good TCO argument for the cheaper and only slightly slower Pentiums. More iGP tests would also be appreciated - for a light gaming CPU using iGP, a better direct comparison would have been nice.
 
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
27 (0.01/day)
surprised you don't need a new motherboard to support the chip.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,278 (6.02/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
So no proof, mostly guess work common sense ;)

FTFY

If you really want proof... take a look at these differences alone it should tell you enough

https://www.techspot.com/review/1619-pentium-gold-g5400-vs-ryzen-2200g/page3.html

And when it comes to igp it gets beyond silly
https://www.techspot.com/review/1619-pentium-gold-g5400-vs-ryzen-2200g/page4.html

So, recap: there is NO workload where the Pentium is a better choice regardless of the clockspeed difference. I really didn't need these benches to tell me this... and I'm surprised you even considered otherwise to be honest.
 
Joined
Jun 22, 2015
Messages
76 (0.02/day)
Processor AMD R7 3800X EKWB
Motherboard Asus Tuf B450M-Pro µATX +MosfetWB (x2)
Cooling EKWB on CPU + GPU / Heatkiller 60/80 on Mosfets / Black Ice SR-1 240mm
Memory 2x8GB G.Skill DDR4 3200C14 @ ----
Video Card(s) Vega64 EKWB
Storage Samsung 512GB NVMe 3.0 x4 / Crucial P1 1TB NVMe 3.0 x2
Display(s) Asus ProArt 23" 1080p / Acer 27" 144Hz FreeSync IPS
Case Fractal Design Arc Mini R2
Power Supply SeaSonic 850W
Keyboard Ducky One TKL / MX Brown

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,712 (3.97/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
FTFY

If you really want proof... take a look at these differences alone it should tell you enough

https://www.techspot.com/review/1619-pentium-gold-g5400-vs-ryzen-2200g/page3.html

And when it comes to igp it gets beyond silly
https://www.techspot.com/review/1619-pentium-gold-g5400-vs-ryzen-2200g/page4.html

So, recap: there is NO workload where the Pentium is a better choice regardless of the clockspeed difference. I really didn't need these benches to tell me this... and I'm surprised you even considered otherwise to be honest.
There's still this, that says there is, but ok: https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Intel/Pentium_Gold_G5600/10.html
To be completely honest, I don't think that Pentium somehow flexes unknown muscle in those scenarios, but rather they don't multithread that well. All I'm saying is there's a bit of silver lining, for this otherwise sorry excuse of a chip.
Also, that "dual-core doesn't cut it for high-refresh gaming, because other processes interfere with game loading" gem, I'll remember for a while ;)
 
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
193 (0.07/day)
fuuuuuuuuuuck.. how could I miss that. It has been like that for whole 2018 I think, and nobody ever mentioned it

It's funny - I had just noticed, but the other guy beat me to it, while at the same time clearly not aware of the mix-up :D Anyhow, the problem starts with the 2600X/2700X reviews, so that's only 8 x 4 = 32 graph images to fix :)
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
3,099 (0.93/day)
Location
Argentina
System Name Ciel / Akane
Processor AMD Ryzen R5 5600X / Intel Core i3 12100F
Motherboard Asus Tuf Gaming B550 Plus / Biostar H610MHP
Cooling ID-Cooling 224-XT Basic / Stock
Memory 2x 16GB Kingston Fury 3600MHz / 2x 8GB Patriot 3200MHz
Video Card(s) Gainward Ghost RTX 3060 Ti / Dell GTX 1660 SUPER
Storage NVMe Kingston KC3000 2TB + NVMe Toshiba KBG40ZNT256G + HDD WD 4TB / NVMe WD Blue SN550 512GB
Display(s) AOC Q27G3XMN / Samsung S22F350
Case Cougar MX410 Mesh-G / Generic
Audio Device(s) Kingston HyperX Cloud Stinger Core 7.1 Wireless PC
Power Supply Aerocool KCAS-500W / Gigabyte P450B
Mouse EVGA X15 / Logitech G203
Keyboard VSG Alnilam / Dell
Software Windows 11
Top