Post Your CyberPunk 2077 Benchmark (2024 edition)

[mrcardio33x]

CPU: BCLK 105 - LLC7 - Scaler X6 - (-) 175 MHz or 5125MHz, stable SHA3, etc.

RAM: 2X 16GB 6200MT/s CL28 36 32 30 / 2200FCLK
VDD: 1.45v VDDQ/IO: 1.30v VSOC: 1.235v

GPU: RTX 4090 + 145 MHz core

1080p NATIVE w/ Ultra RT:

130.57 FPS Avg - + 20 FPS vs. Gamer's Nexus Benchmark
116.03 FPS Min - + 28 FPS vs. Gamer's Nexus Benchmark

Gamer's Nexus achieved the following with the same CPU / GPU:

110 FPS Avg
88 FPS Min

CPU: BCLK 105 - LLC7 - Scaler X6 - (-) 175 MHz or 5125MHz, stable SHA3, etc.

RAM: 2X 16GB 6200MT/s CL28 36 32 30 / 2200FCLK
VDD: 1.45v VDDQ/IO: 1.30v VSOC: 1.235v

GPU: RTX 4090 + 145 MHz core

1440p DLSS Ray Reconstruction / Path Tracing / SSR Psycho:

 

[Dragam1337]

CPU: BCLK 105 - LLC7 - Scaler X6 - (-) 175 MHz or 5125MHz, stable SHA3, etc.

RAM: 2X 16GB 6200MT/s CL28 36 32 30 / 2200FCLK
VDD: 1.45v VDDQ/IO: 1.30v VSOC: 1.235v

GPU: RTX 4090 + 145 MHz core

1080p NATIVE w/ Ultra RT:

130.57 FPS Avg - + 20 FPS vs. Gamer's Nexus Benchmark
116.03 FPS Min - + 28 FPS vs. Gamer's Nexus Benchmark

Gamer's Nexus achieved the following with the same CPU / GPU:

110 FPS Avg
88 FPS Min

View attachment 336618

You aren't using a default preset like gamers nexus are.

 

[mrcardio33x]

You aren't using a default preset like gamers nexus are.

Okay so what exactly are they running?

I saw 1080p Native Ultra RT.

There's no "default preset" for running NATIVE as far as I can tell. - It shows "custom" because it's NATIVE.

My results would be higher if running some sort of upscaling "Preset" So if they are running some sort of "preset" the results would be even more in my favor.

There' s no "default" for NATIVE - it states "custom" because it's being ran NATIVELY / no Upscaling, etc.

Yeah, just check again, there's not "preset" for running NATIVE.

Regardless, I ran the Ultra Ray Tracing "preset" at 1080p

CPU: BCLK 105 - LLC7 - Scaler X6 - Boost Clock (-) 175 MHz or 5125MHz, stable SHA3, etc.

Yeah so, no way I'm +63 FPS ahead but +20 is doable.

 

[yzonker]

GN doesn't use the built in benchmark. You're results aren't comparable.

 

[mrcardio33x]

GN doesn't use the built in benchmark. You're results aren't comparable.

What are they using?

Otherwise it's basically impossible to get consistent results / like for like.

Regardless, my frames rates are generally higher during actual gameplay.

 

[yzonker]

What are they using?

Otherwise it's basically impossible to get consistent results / like for like.

Regardless, my frames rates are generally higher during actual gameplay.

My understanding is both GN and HUB use a custom run through. Not sure exactly how they do it.

I know Digital Foundry has some additional automated run throughs they can use. Don't know how they got them.

 

[mrcardio33x]

Screenshots showing CPU / RAM performance = Everything to do with benchmark performance.

My understanding is both GN and HUB use a custom run through. Not sure exactly how they do it.

I know Digital Foundry has some additional automated run throughs they can use. Don't know how they got them.

OH okay, so there's no way to compare. They use some special program or something.

 

[Franz]

My understanding is both GN and HUB use a custom run through. Not sure exactly how they do it.

I know Digital Foundry has some additional automated run throughs they can use. Don't know how they got them.

This is awful, I know benchmark do not reflect 100% in gameplay expereience but it dificultes and become a bit shady in results. In standard tool it will be more easy to compare old vs new results with new drives and so

 

[Dragam1337]

Screenshots showing CPU / RAM performance = Everything to do with benchmark performance.

Those benchmark screenshots would have been relevant in their respective benchmark threads... not in the cyberpunk benchmark thread.

But here you go, something to compare against

 

[Kipicog]

What is the point of 1080p testing with a 4090 tho? Don't you get almost same performance at 1440p?

 

[95Viper]

Stay on topic.
STOP insulting others.
Stop the inappropriate behavior.

If you have a problem... report it. Don't become the problem.

 

[arbiter]

1440p ray trace medium profile just turned off DLSS. 68.51 on 4070s undervolted to .96volts at 2700mhz max. set card back to stock profile at 80% fan lock which is 1.1 volts only got 69.29fps. 220watt draw vs 170watt(undervolted). even setting power target to 110% only bumped fps to 69.43 over 69.29 at 100%. did notice that stock setting gpu was under 2700mhz a bit as it was at 100% gpu power.

 

[Beginner Macro Device]

1440p ray trace medium profile just turned off DLSS. 68.51 on 4070s undervolted to .96volts at 2700mhz max. set card back to stock profile at 80% fan lock which is 1.1 volts only got 69.29fps. 220watt draw vs 170watt(undervolted). even setting power target to 110% only bumped fps to 69.43 over 69.29 at 100%. did notice that stock setting gpu was under 2700mhz a bit as it was at 100% gpu power.

Maybe UV it to .99 V at 2720 MHz + as much of VRAM overclocking as possible? I reckon it's the way you hit 70+ FPS.

 

[freeagent]

Nothin but raw power from team dinosaur

 

[Beginner Macro Device]

Nothin but raw power from team dinosaur



View attachment 336923

I'd disable ray-traced shadows and enable DLAA. 1440p without DLAA is meh.

 

[freeagent]

I'd disable ray-traced shadows and enable DLAA. 1440p without DLAA is meh.

I usually use default settings at 3840x2160, so all of that stuff would be on.

 

[picnic]

7800 XT way under represented here... ps. I'm on linux

1440p @ Ultra native, no rt (-130mV, 2600Mhz max clock, 2438Mhz mem clock, stock power limit)

1440p @ Ultra native, no rt (-130mV, 2800Mhz max clock, 2600Mhz mem clock, max power limit)

 

[ShrimpBrime]

1080P everything about maxed out. DLSS enabled. AMD fidelity enabled to Quality and Ray Tracing enabled.

4070 Super Backed by a 120$ 14100F processor (locked 4.5ghz) 4 cores 8 threads, didn't seem to make a difference over larger processors.

EDIT:

Should mention the card is at bone stock silent mode. No overclocking except system memory which is running 6400/DDR5-3200mhz effective 36-36-36 with a locked System Agent at 1.00v

 

[fevgatos]

What are they using?

Otherwise it's basically impossible to get consistent results / like for like.

Regardless, my frames rates are generally higher during actual gameplay.

The in game bench is pretty lightweight so im not so sure your actual gameplay is higher. Try tom's dinner area for example. I can give you my save file if you don't know where it is

And here is the ingame bench