Post your PSPDFKit WebAssembly Benchmark speeds!

[SchumannFrequency]

You can take the test on this page: https://pspdfkit.com/webassembly-benchmark/
I myself score this result:

I use the following hardware:
Intel i3-3240 + 4GB RAM @1600Mhz DDR3 single channel + NVIDIA GTX 650 1GB + EVO 850 500GB

If I were to overclock this CPU I should score around 3800.
The specific score doesn't seem bad to me for an 11 year old $117.00 CPU.

 

[Athlonite]

 

[SchumannFrequency]

iPhone 12 mini & Safari scores +- 3970 in this benchmark

 

[SchumannFrequency]

AMD R5 PRO 3400G + Clear Linux & Opera browser

 

[SchumannFrequency]

iPhone 13 + Safari 16.4 + WebKit 604.1

 

[SchumannFrequency]

As you can see, the difference between the AMD R5 PRO 3400G + Clear Linux & Opera browser and the Intel i3-3240 + FreeBSD & Chromium is smaller than you might think.
In fact, it seems that the fastest systems currently in existence with a heavy overclock may not be 2x faster than this 11 year old Intel Core i3 CPU.

 

[Athlonite]

Well Vivaldi seem to be doing a lot of work in the background this new version is faster than the previous versions

Vivaldi

6.0.2979.18 (Stable channel) (64-bit)

 

[SchumannFrequency]

Well Vivaldi seem to be doing a lot of work in the background this new version is faster than the previous versions

Vivaldi

6.0.2979.18 (Stable channel) (64-bit)

The difference between the 13900KF and your 5800X is about 35.1% in single core performance. The difference between the i3-3240 and the 3400G is 40.8% and this only gives a difference of 469 points in this test of PSPDFKit. Logically the 13900KF should currently score around 2100 in this test.

The i3-3240 = 3864
The i9-13900KF = 2100

2 cores vs 24 cores
3MB cache vs 36MB cache
1600 MHz RAM vs 7200 MHz RAM
3.4GHZ vs 5.80 GHz + (very) large differences in IPC

3864/2100 = 1.84

 

[SchumannFrequency]

Hardware: Intel i3-3240 + 8GB DDR3 @1600MHz dual-channel + NVIDIA GTX 650 1GB + EVO 850 500GB
Software: ROSA Fresh 12.4 + LXQt + Chrome version 117.0.5911.2 + proprietary Nvidia driver

In this particular test, ROSA Linux is amazingly fast compared to Clear Linux and most other Linux distributions.

 

[SchumannFrequency]

Hardware: Intel i3-3240 + 8GB DDR3 @1600MHz dual-channel + NVIDIA GTX 650 1GB + EVO 850 500GB
Software: openSUSE Tumbleweed + XFCE + Firefox 115.0.3 + proprietary Nvidia driver

 

[SchumannFrequency]

Hardware: Intel i3-3240 + 8GB DDR3 @1600MHz dual-channel + NVIDIA GTX 650 1GB + EVO 850 500GB
Software: ALT Sisyphus + LXQt + Firefox 116.0 + open-source Nvidia driver

 

[SchumannFrequency]

Result: 2399
Software: ALT Sisyphus -- LXQt -- Chromium 117.0.5938.132 -- proprietary Nvidia driver
Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6000 MHz CL40 -- GTX 650 1GB -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- EVO 850 500GB

Result: 2334
Software: Clear Linux -- GNOME Shell -- Chromium 118.0.5993.70 -- nouveau GPU driver
Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6000 MHz CL40 -- GTX 650 1GB -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- EVO 850 500GB

 

[SchumannFrequency]

Result: 2275
Software: ALT Sisyphus -- LXQt -- Brave (snap edge channel) -- proprietary Nvidia driver
Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6000 MHz CL40 -- GTX 650 1GB -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- EVO 850 500GB

Result: 2262
Software: ALT Sisyphus -- LXQt -- Chromium version 120.0.6051.2 -- proprietary Nvidia driver
Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6000 MHz CL40 -- GTX 650 1GB -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- EVO 850 500GB

 

[SchumannFrequency]

Result: 2242

Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6200 MHz CL35 -- GTX 650 1GB -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: Clear Linux -- GNOME -- Wayland -- nouveau GPU driver -- F2FS as root -- Firefox 121.0

 

[SchumannFrequency]

Result: 1989
Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6200 MHz CL36 -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: Alpine Linux -- Chrome (unstable) Flatpak version -- river wm -- open source GPU driver

It seems that Chrome has become faster in this test compared to the previous editions. Long ago, Chrome might have been faster than it is now in this test.

 

[Marcus Vinicus]

Browser: Vivaldi
System: See specs below

With this benchmark I understand that the lower the score the better?

 

[SchumannFrequency]

With this benchmark I understand that the lower the score the better?

Indeed.

The reason you score so well is because Vivaldi, Nyxt (WebKit) and Chromium have apparently now become much faster than Firefox and Chrome in this test.

I used Chrome in my last result.

 

[Marcus Vinicus]

The reason you score so well is because Vivaldi, Nyxt (WebKit) and Chromium have apparently now become much faster than Firefox and Chrome in this test.

I did a couple of quick runs just now:
Chrome Canary = 1842
Edge Canary = 3669

 

[cazzie.nl]

x570 / 5700x / 6800 / 32GB / Fedora Linux / Edge

* no overclock

PSPDFKit Wasm Score: 5650

 

[johnspack]

Weird benchmark... not sure what to make of it: oh and manjaro running firefox....

 

[Athlonite]

The difference between the 13900KF and your 5800X is about 35.1% in single core performance. The difference between the i3-3240 and the 3400G is 40.8% and this only gives a difference of 469 points in this test of PSPDFKit. Logically the 13900KF should currently score around 2100 in this test.

The i3-3240 = 3864
The i9-13900KF = 2100

2 cores vs 24 cores
3MB cache vs 36MB cache
1600 MHz RAM vs 7200 MHz RAM
3.4GHZ vs 5.80 GHz + (very) large differences in IPC

3864/2100 = 1.84

base clock is 3.4GHz but when actually used it's 4.85GHz Also the latest version of Vivaldi is feckin crankin this out

 

[Ivan Bliminse]

 

[Hugis]

Strange benchmark....