AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX Review - Disrupting the GeForce RTX 4080 500

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX Review - Disrupting the GeForce RTX 4080

Architecture »

Introduction

AMD Logo

The AMD next-generation we've long been waiting for is finally here! The new Radeon RX 7900 XTX in this review, and the Radeon RX 7900 XT, which we're also reviewing today, debut the company's 3rd generation RDNA graphics architecture, or RDNA 3. With it, the company is also introducing the world's first chiplet-based GPU in an effort to maximize utilization of the TSMC 5 nm foundry node, without compromising on performance, or too much on power. The RDNA 3 graphics architecture promises a similar 50% leap in performance/Watt over the previous-generation RDNA2, which helped AMD compete in the high-end segment after a long gap of 7-odd years. The new architecture improves in many areas, including compute power, memory sub-system, display engine with support for the latest DisplayPort 2.1 standard, multiple-stream acceleration for the latest video formats, and most importantly, AI acceleration, and a more advanced ray tracing hardware.



AMD's decision to leverage chiplets to build the new "Navi 31" GPU powering the Radeon RX 7900 series, has to do with attempting to keep Moore's Law alive in spirit. The idea is to achieve high-end performance leadership at the same sub-$1000 price-points that we've had before. NVIDIA on the other hand considers Moore's Law dead, and says that it's no longer possible to economically build large high-end GPUs. AMD therefore identified all the components that can do with a slightly older foundry node—such as the L3 cache, memory controllers, and memory PHY, and moved them from the GPU, onto six little dies called MCDs (memory cache dies), which are built on the slightly older 6 nm process. The remaining GPU with all its compute-intensive hardware, would be called the GCD (graphics compute die). The GCD and MCDs would be connected by an extreme bandwidth Infinity Fabric Fanout interconnect, which enables 5.4 TB/s of bandwidth between the GCD and MCDs. Each MCD has a 16 MB segment of the GPU's total 96 MB Infinity Cache, which is a bit smaller than the 128 MB of the previous generation, but made up for by the 87% higher GDDR6 memory bandwidth from the GPU's 384-bit memory bus, handling 20 Gbps-rated memory, for 960 GB/s of bandwidth.

The RDNA 3 graphics architecture which we're reviewing today, introduces dual issue-rate compute units, with a high degree of optimization in the way idle SIMD resources are utilized, support for newer math formats, and a new AI accelerator that retasks the SIMDs for matrix math functions. Together, these optimizations produce a 17% IPC uplift over the previous-generation RDNA2 CU. There are 96 CUs physically present in the silicon, which work out to 6,144 stream processors. The architecture also sees an increase in engine clocks, and a decoupling of the shader clock speeds to those of the GPU's Front End, which operates at a 10-15% higher frequency. The most striking aspect of the RDNA 3 architecture is that the typical board power of these GPUs is well contained, with the RX 7900 XTX rated at just 350 W, and the RX 7900 XT at 315 W—both of which can be fed by just two 8-pin PCIe power connectors, and cooled by solutions much smaller than those you find on the competing NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 or RTX 4090 "Ada."

The Radeon RX 7900 XTX we're reviewing here, maxes out the "Navi 31" silicon, featuring all 96 compute units, or all 6,144 stream processors, 96 second generation Ray Accelerators, 384 TMUs, a whopping 192 ROPs, and the GPU's whole 384-bit memory interface, holding 24 GB of 20 Gbps-rated GDDR6 memory. All this for "just" $1,000, or the same price the previous-generation RX 6900 XT debuted at. This is where AMD's choices with the chiplet architecture begins to make sense, as both of NVIDIA's competing GPUs are priced much higher.

We also have a second Navi 31 review for you today: the Radeon RX 7900 XT.

Radeon RX 7900 XTX Market Segment Analysis
PriceCoresROPsCore
Clock
Boost
Clock
Memory
Clock
GPUTransistorsMemory
RTX 3070$5005888961500 MHz1725 MHz1750 MHzGA10417400M8 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit
RTX 3070 Ti$6006144961575 MHz1770 MHz1188 MHzGA10417400M8 GB, GDDR6X, 256-bit
RX 6800$5103840961815 MHz2105 MHz2000 MHzNavi 2126800M16 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit
RX 6800 XT$65046081282015 MHz2250 MHz2000 MHzNavi 2126800M16 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit
RTX 3080$7508704961440 MHz1710 MHz1188 MHzGA10228000M10 GB, GDDR6X, 320-bit
RTX 3080 Ti$950102401121365 MHz1665 MHz1188 MHzGA10228000M12 GB, GDDR6X, 384-bit
RX 6900 XT$70051201282015 MHz2250 MHz2000 MHzNavi 2126800M16 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit
RX 6950 XT$80051201282100 MHz2310 MHz2250 MHzNavi 2126800M16 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit
RTX 3090$950104961121395 MHz1695 MHz1219 MHzGA10228000M24 GB, GDDR6X, 384-bit
RX 7900 XT$90053761922000 MHz2400 MHz2500 MHzNavi 3157700M20 GB, GDDR6, 320-bit
RTX 3090 Ti$1400107521121560 MHz1950 MHz1313 MHzGA10228000M24 GB, GDDR6X, 384-bit
RTX 4080$120097281122205 MHz2505 MHz1400 MHzAD10345900M16 GB, GDDR6X, 256-bit
RX 7900 XTX$100061441922300 MHz2500 MHz2500 MHzNavi 3157700M24 GB, GDDR6, 384-bit
RTX 4090$2400163841762235 MHz2520 MHz1313 MHzAD10276300M24 GB, GDDR6X, 384-bit
Next Page »Architecture
View as single page
Jun 2nd, 2024 04:54 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts