Tuesday, June 13th 2017

Toshiba Announces AL14SX Series 2.5-inch 15K RPM Hard Drives

Toshiba Corporation's Storage & Electronic Devices Solutions Company today announced the launch of AL14SX Series, new additions to its line-up of enterprise performance hard disk drives (HDD) for mission critical server and storage applications. Sample shipments start today.

The AL14SX Series of 15,000RPM 2.5-inch drives features a 12 Gbit/s SAS interface. Available models are 4K native (4Kn) model and 512 emulation (512e) model that feature Advanced Format Sector Technologies, and 512 native (512n) model optimized for legacy applications and hypervisor environments. The AL14SX Series delivers a suitable choice for customers' diverse applications.
The AL14SX Series is available in 300 GB, 600 GB and 900 GB capacities. The 900 GB model offers a 50% increase in maximum capacity from the 600 GB of the predecessor AL13SX Series. The 4Kn and 512e models also delivers an approximately 19% increase in sustained data rate, pushing it to 290 MB/s, and an approximately 28.7% improvement in power efficiency (W/GB). These improvements in capacity, speed and power-saving contribute to a lower total cost of ownership (TCO) for the server and system.

Customers also can select models supporting Sanitize Instant Erase (SIE), which realizes fast invalidation of data recorded on the disks, allowing for efficient disposal and reuse.

For more information, visit this page.
Add your own comment

21 Comments on Toshiba Announces AL14SX Series 2.5-inch 15K RPM Hard Drives

#1
Nuckles56
I'm trying to work out who would actually be using these drives still
Posted on Reply
#2
Prima.Vera
The size of those are ridiculously small. They are off by a "0" if they want to impress with those drives. 300GB??? Seriously?? Is frickin' 2017!! LOL
Posted on Reply
#3
arterius2
Prima.VeraThe size of those are ridiculously small. They are off by a "0" if they want to impress with those drives. 300GB??? Seriously?? Is frickin' 2017!! LOL
lol
Posted on Reply
#4
arterius2
Nuckles56I'm trying to work out who would actually be using these drives still
I guess it's for people who wants neither capacity nor speed.
Posted on Reply
#5
notb
Nuckles56I'm trying to work out who would actually be using these drives still
Pretty much everyone.
Enterprise-grade SSD are still hugely expensive.

Current 960GB Toshiba SAS SSD costs around 1100 EUR.
This 900GB SAS HDD will cost around 300 EUR.
Posted on Reply
#6
Ubersonic
Prima.VeraThe size of those are ridiculously small. They are off by a "0" if they want to impress with those drives. 300GB??? Seriously?? Is frickin' 2017!! LOL
SAS/SCSI were/are always smaller in size than SATA/PATA, they are performance orientated not capacity orientated, the available capacity will always be higher as they are designed to be used in RAID.
Posted on Reply
#7
BorgOvermind
UbersonicSAS/SCSI were/are always smaller in size than SATA/PATA, they are performance orientated not capacity orientated, the available capacity will always be higher as they are designed to be used in RAID.
The 2.5" are used as system drives.
For data storage, there are plenty of 3.5" SAS and SATA (like WD Gold/RE) options.
Posted on Reply
#8
notb
BorgOvermindThe 2.5" are used as system drives.
For data storage, there are plenty of 3.5" SAS and SATA (like WD Gold/RE) options.
WD Gold is a disk from a different category. They prioritize capacity, not speed (3.5", 7200 RPM).
A WD equivalent for Toshiba's 15K drives was called XE and has been discontinued.

It's not easy to make a 3.5" 15K drive, but the actual reason behind 2.5" HDD popularity is much simpler.
2U rack is 3.5" high, but a 3.5" HDD is 4" wide, so it won't fit mounted vertically.

As a result a 2U can hold just 12x 3.5" drives, but up to 24x 2.5". :)
Posted on Reply
#10
_JP_
Nuckles56I'm trying to work out who would actually be using these drives still
Prima.VeraThe size of those are ridiculously small. They are off by a "0" if they want to impress with those drives. 300GB??? Seriously?? Is frickin' 2017!! LOL
18TB RAID 60 says "Hi".
Posted on Reply
#11
HopelesslyFaithful
Prima.VeraThe size of those are ridiculously small. They are off by a "0" if they want to impress with those drives. 300GB??? Seriously?? Is frickin' 2017!! LOL
2.5in 15K drive derp derp. Shocked there is a 900GB model. Thats impressive but clearly your ignorant so....
Posted on Reply
#12
Static~Charge
HopelesslyFaithfulThats impressive but clearly your ignorant so....
The ignorance seems to be spreading.... :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#13
dir_d
Id rather go with SATA SM SSD's from Samsung, no reason for these drives unless you've got a hell of a cache software.
Posted on Reply
#14
notb
dir_dId rather go with SATA SM SSD's from Samsung, no reason for these drives unless you've got a hell of a cache software.
Samsung SM is a SATA drive. SAS drives are (were?) named PM. And once again: we're talking about 3x higher cost for going SSD. Keep in mind a large HDD RAID will offer good performance anyway.
Posted on Reply
#15
HopelesslyFaithful
notbSamsung SM is a SATA drive. SAS drives are (were?) named PM. And once again: we're talking about 3x higher cost for going SSD. Keep in mind a large HDD RAID will offer good performance anyway.
additionally they dont wear out and can easily be wiped.
Posted on Reply
#16
R-T-B
HopelesslyFaithfuladditionally they dont wear out and can easily be wiped.
True about the "they don't wear out" part, but nearly all SSDs can be easily wiped too, just sayin'
Posted on Reply
#17
HopelesslyFaithful
R-T-BTrue about the "they don't wear out" part, but nearly all SSDs can be easily wiped too, just sayin'
that is factually false. You can not wipe OP and other sections under normal operations like you can with HDDs. There are hidden sections of SSDs where HDDs do not have that. Only way to wipe an SSD is using manufacturer sanitize feature and i dont trust that is 100% complete wipe. This also requires it to not be in an HBA and other restrictions and all data is lost. No free space wipe is possible on an SSD

Additonally, wiping a SSD adds a lot of wear. Also you can't full wipe free space as i stated above with an SSD and even if you could that is a ton of wear. When I had an HDD as my main drive i wiped free space weekly. If that was even possible on an SSD you would wear it out significantly.

Also there is no way to use magnets or degauss an SSD like you can with a HDD. You can instantly trash a HDD but you can't do that with an SSD.
Posted on Reply
#18
R-T-B
The crypto sanitize feature under Opal is well documented, and that's indeed what I was referring to. Wipe to me = full drive wipe, I wasn't thinking partial at all.
Posted on Reply
#19
HopelesslyFaithful
R-T-BThe crypto sanitize feature under Opal is well documented, and that's indeed what I was referring to. Wipe to me = full drive wipe, I wasn't thinking partial at all.
wiping free space is important to clear things cached to your rig you dont want cached. Or data you deleted but want to ensure its 100% gone.
Posted on Reply
#20
R-T-B
HopelesslyFaithfulwiping free space is important to clear things cached to your rig you dont want cached. Or data you deleted but want to ensure its 100% gone.
We're talking in the context of enterprise server drives though?
Posted on Reply
#21
HopelesslyFaithful
R-T-BWe're talking in the context of enterprise server drives though?
yes and data security is important. Wiping free space while saving current data is important. It isn't practical to pull a drive out save data wipe it and reload it. If you want to wipe old data on an SSD it simply isn't possible while it is live in a system. On regular HDDs it is.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Feb 10th, 2025 20:23 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts