Wednesday, February 1st 2023

Intel Confirms Arc A750 Price Cut, Claims Big Performance Gains as Drivers Mature

Intel confirmed the price-cut for its Arc "Alchemist" A750 performance-segment graphics card that we earlier reported. The company also gave us a quick heads-up of just how far along the Arc 7-series graphics cards have matured in performance and features, over the months of driver updates. In particular, the company focused on how performance of the A750 is about 43% higher than it was at launch in DirectX 9 titles—an API the Xe-HPG graphics architecture doesn't natively support.

Intel relies on a combination of D3D9 to D3D12 API translation, and game-specific optimization at the driver-level, to play DirectX 9 games. The company has been optimizing popular DirectX 9 titles over the past several months, and put out performance gains in a new presentation. Since launch, Intel has added XeSS support to over 35 games, and promises to expand the list. With its starting price now at $249, one can expect custom-design boards, such as the ASRock A750 Challenger OC and the GUNNIR A750 Photon, to be priced at or under $300, although the reference-design Intel A750 Limited Edition cards can be found in some places. Intel also announced that it is bundling "Nightingale," and "The Settlers: New Allies" with pre-built desktops that combine 12th Gen or 13th Gen Core desktop processors and Arc A750 graphics cards.
The complete slide-deck follows.

Add your own comment

63 Comments on Intel Confirms Arc A750 Price Cut, Claims Big Performance Gains as Drivers Mature

#51
W1zzard
L|NK|N@W1zzard Do you have any plans to revisit these cards in the future to see how much the drivers have matured and improved performance?
yes
Posted on Reply
#52
AnotherReader
W1zzardyes
It would be nice to include the A770 and A750 in reviews of new games like Dead Space remastered.
Posted on Reply
#53
RJARRRPCGP
AusWolfI have one. It's not as bad as people think. ;)
It was for the RX 6500 XT having no video encoders. It's like the new Radeon 9550!
Posted on Reply
#54
AusWolf
RJARRRPCGPIt was for the RX 6500 XT having no video encoders. It's like the new Radeon 9550!
How many people need that video encoder? 5% maybe?
Posted on Reply
#55
Unregistered
Wouldn't buy if it was 100 dollars with stellar driver support.
#56
Colddecked
spanjamanWouldn't buy if it was 100 dollars with stellar driver support.
If I found a 100 dollar 2nd hand a750 I'd buy it without hesitation. The improvement in performance in newer drivers has piqued my interest.
Posted on Reply
#57
mrnagant
Wait, so DX9 titles don't work unless supported by the drivers? Or because of the translation layer they are not optimized so instead of 250fps you get 220fps?

What about older games that don't use DX, or an older iteration of DX?
Posted on Reply
#58
bug
mrnagantWait, so DX9 titles don't work unless supported by the drivers? Or because of the translation layer they are not optimized so instead of 250fps you get 220fps?

What about older games that don't use DX, or an older iteration of DX?
Everything that doesn't need more than DX9 can probably be played on an IGP by now. I can't see a translation layer getting too much in the way.
Posted on Reply
#59
AusWolf
mrnagantWait, so DX9 titles don't work unless supported by the drivers? Or because of the translation layer they are not optimized so instead of 250fps you get 220fps?

What about older games that don't use DX, or an older iteration of DX?
The thing is, Intel's Xe architecture (that you find in the Axxx series Arc GPUs, as well as iGPUs starting from 11th gen Core) doesn't natively support DX9. Intel solves this by applying a translation layer in the driver that "translates" DX9 code into DX11, which comes at some performance penalty. Considering that we haven't seen new DX9 titles in years, I don't think the performance hit is anything to be worried about.
Posted on Reply
#60
bug
AusWolfThe thing is, Intel's Xe architecture (that you find in the Axxx series Arc GPUs, as well as iGPUs starting from 11th gen Core) doesn't natively support DX9. Intel solves this by applying a translation layer in the driver that "translates" DX9 code into DX11, which comes at some performance penalty. Considering that we haven't seen new DX9 titles in years, I don't think the performance hit is anything to be worried about.
I mean, the last demanding DX9 that I can name otoh is the original Witcher.
Posted on Reply
#61
AusWolf
bugI mean, the last demanding DX9 that I can name otoh is the original Witcher.
Exactly. And as you said: it runs on an iGPU, so the performance hit coming from the translation layer in Intel's driver is nothing to be afraid of. :)
Posted on Reply
#62
Unregistered
ColddeckedIf I found a 100 dollar 2nd hand a750 I'd buy it without hesitation. The improvement in performance in newer drivers has piqued my interest.
Whereas I wouldn't take it if you were offering it to me for free.
#63
chrcoluk
Well the price for this in the UK for a 8 gig card is pretty good actually, I was expecting it to cost more.

£250 for 8 gigs and performing reasonably at 1080p.
W1zzardyes
Would you be willing to do a lesser known DX9 game they have not included in their featured list? I can gift you a steam key for it. Compare it on old and new drivers.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 27th, 2024 01:28 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts