Friday, November 1st 2024

Microsoft Offers $30 Windows 10 Security Extension for Home Users

Microsoft will allow home users to extend security support for Windows 10 beyond its October 2025 end-of-life date for a $30 fee per year. This marks the first time the Redmond giant has offered such an option to individual consumers, as extended security updates were previously available only to business and education customers. While the extension will maintain essential security patches, users won't receive new features, bug fixes, or technical support from Microsoft. This decision affects millions of Windows 10 users worldwide who may be unable or unwilling to upgrade to Windows 11, either due to hardware limitations or personal preference. While Microsoft strongly encourages users to transition to Windows 11, which offers enhanced security features and AI capabilities, many older computers don't meet the newer operating system's stricter hardware requirements.

The company will begin enrollment for the Extended Security Updates (ESU) program closer to the 2025 deadline. Microsoft will also continue providing Security Intelligence Updates for Microsoft Defender Antivirus through at least October 2028, offering an additional layer of protection for Windows 10 users. This move can be interpreted as Microsoft's acknowledgment of the significant number of users still running Windows 10 and the potential security risks of leaving them unprotected. Using an ESU package from an official source like Microsoft is always better than sourcing them from third-party like 0patch offers, and it is a welcome addition for millions of PCs running Windows 10 today.
Source: Microsoft
Add your own comment

118 Comments on Microsoft Offers $30 Windows 10 Security Extension for Home Users

#1
Chaitanya
$30 is quite reasonable for 1st party extended support, might consider paying for my PC(even though it stays primarily offline) by 2028 my AM4 system might be up for upgrade anyways.
Posted on Reply
#2
Vayra86
They finally figured it out. Earn money while keeping users happy AND the OS secure. Win win win.

Took them long enough!
Posted on Reply
#3
Caring1
They worked out they can announce EOL and then charge more
Posted on Reply
#4
windwhirl
Chaitanya$30 is quite reasonable for 1st party extended support, might consider paying for my PC(even though it stays primarily offline) by 2028 my AM4 system might be up for upgrade anyways.
I'm not going to lie, I didn't expect anyone to pay for it at all.

That aside, 30 dollars is just for the first year, and you only get that year. The other two years seem to be exclusive for Business/Education markets.

For Business, the extra two years will be more expensive than the first.
arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/04/post-2025-windows-10-updates-for-businesses-start-at-61-per-pc-go-up-from-there/
Posted on Reply
#5
_roman_
30$ / year is very cheap for security fixes for your operating system of choice. I hope this keep going. I wish some older microsoft operating system would get that modell also.

Some guys are on older computer and are unwilling to migrate to newer operating system or hardware. 30$ is very very very cheap.
Posted on Reply
#6
Hecate91
$30 for a year seems reasonable, though disappointing if MS is only going to extended updates for 1 year.
But realistically I don't expect most consumers to pay for updates unless Microsoft really starts to bother users with messages to pay up or buy a new PC when W10 goes EOL.
Posted on Reply
#7
Onasi
It’s a reasonable price if one absolutely must stay on 10 for a year. I would assume MS hopes/intends that in this year those users will find means to upgrade to a PC that’s 11 “compatible” according to their specs.
Needless to say, using a PC with an unsupported OS is a pretty bad idea, unless it’s disconnected from the net and is specifically for some niche use. So not a bad move on MS part.
Posted on Reply
#8
Tek-Check
This is not going to work. There will be a huge backlash against Microsoft for trying to capitalise on Win10 and force people into Win11. Typical for-profit BS.

They are not suddenly going to stop providing free updates to hundreds of millions of PCs in schools, hospitals, transport hubs and other institutions. State governments need to intervene finally and have some serious conversations with MS.

This is prevent similar $$ that happened a few weeks ago grounding airplanes and causing severe disruption globally.
Posted on Reply
#9
Onasi
Tek-CheckThis is not going to work. There will be a huge backlash against Microsoft for trying to capitalise on Win10 and force people into Win11. Typical for-profit BS.
They have announced dates for 10 EOL a long time ago. They’ve previously supported it for a decade. There’s nothing different from previous OS releases here that MS is doing and certainly nothing illegal.
Tek-CheckThey are not suddenly going to stop providing free updates to hundreds of millions of PCs in schools, hospitals, transport hubs and other institutions.
Those are not, or at least SHOULD NOT, be on a Home licensing. So they will get support for longer.
Tek-CheckThis is prevent similar $$ that happened a few weeks ago grounding airplanes and causing severe disruption globally.
Ah, you mean the one that had nothing to do with MS at all and was caused by a third-party security firm pushing out a scuffed update?
Posted on Reply
#10
Raiden85
Nothing stopping you from using 11 unless your CPU is prehistoric. Been running 11 from day 1 and it's been a rock solid OS.
Posted on Reply
#11
loracle706
Means that windows 11 is shit and they are not sure about windows 12, and no i'm not going to pay every year for that, they are dreaming a lot and i hope no one will encourage things like that !!
Posted on Reply
#12
TheDeeGee
As long as Windows 11 continues to be in the news with bugs and errors i'll gladly pay $30 for another year of security updates.
Posted on Reply
#13
windwhirl
Tek-Checkschools, hospitals, transport hubs and other institutions.
Education gets three years for 1 dollar each user each year, seemingly. So quite cheap and mostly symbolic.

Hospitals and institutions should be on business-like contracts so each case might be different and can't really be dumbed down to "oh Micro$oft is bleeding everyone dry"
Tek-CheckState governments need to intervene finally and have some serious conversations with MS.
State governments should be on business like contracts as well and they should have budgeted their goddamn systems upgrades as well.

Also, intervention? The only government that could intervene is the US one, and it would be seen as the government getting into things they shouldn't so it will never happen.
Posted on Reply
#14
Squared
I have 3 Windows 10 computers. Would I have to pay for all of them?
Posted on Reply
#15
A Computer Guy
Caring1They worked out they can announce EOL and then charge more
Then get you to pay for maintenance without also removing their intrusive-wares. Still no perfect solution but I guess that's life.
Posted on Reply
#16
Shrek
And to think I just got another PC for Windows 11 when I could have kept the Core 2 running
Posted on Reply
#17
Ayhamb99
Ayhamb99I have a feeling they will offer extended support just like what they did with Windows XP and 7, We're 1 year away from their planned end of support but according to statistics from this site Windows 10 still has more than 60%+ marketshare, now that figure would probably continue to decline throughout 2025 but considering W11 is still pretty unpopular and somewhat disliked plus the hardware requirements, people are still going to be reluctant to upgrade.

I seriously doubt that they would not offer extended support for W10 just like what they did with XP and W7.
Called it in another thread lol.

While paying sucks, I would honestly rather pay $30 than upgrade to W11.
Posted on Reply
#18
Mindweaver
Moderato®™
The amount of people saying it's okay to pay 30 bucks for security updates is alarming.. lol
Posted on Reply
#19
Raiden85
MindweaverThe amount of people saying it's okay to pay 30 bucks for security updates is alarming.. lol
Really is, because if MS can see people paying for this then they'll be charging for the large yearly updates like 24H2 next.
Posted on Reply
#20
bonehead123
"If ya wanna play (on W10), ya gotzsta pay"

'nuff said !

A money grab by M$ ? Yep, but at least it is a reasonable amount, and is within M$'s usual practices of trying to squeeze people for anything & everything they can....
Posted on Reply
#21
kondamin
Making it pretty dangerous for them selves there.
They are killing outlook and replacing it with the POS that is 'new outlook' there is even less of a reason to stick to Microsoft office and windows for small businesses that don't have their own software running on windows and now demanding an other $30 to keep things going for just an other year.
Posted on Reply
#22
Raiden85
kondaminMaking it pretty dangerous for them selves there.
They are killing outlook and replacing it with the POS that is 'new outlook' there is even less of a reason to stick to Microsoft office and windows for small businesses that don't have their own software running on windows and now demanding an other $30 to keep things going for just an other year.
I wouldn't say they are demanding it because if you’re on 11 then the updates will be free as usual. It's only by choice that some may want to stay on 10 which is EOL as it's an old OS. They've offered additional support to businesses for years, just a nice bonus they are offering to consumers and for a very reasonable price if they want to stay on a dead OS.
Posted on Reply
#23
Wirko
Here's how problems will be solved in the real world...

Posted on Reply
#24
mtosev
I'm surprised that the price isn't higher. If someone asked me I would thought it would be higher.
Posted on Reply
#25
windwhirl
SquaredI have 3 Windows 10 computers. Would I have to pay for all of them?
The price is per PC.
MindweaverThe amount of people saying it's okay to pay 30 bucks for security updates is alarming.. lol
I honestly thought straight up nearly no one would pay, not so much for the price itself, but rather because:
1-people here love to go "fuck Macro$hit" and such, lol, so for the people here I'd have thought "nah, no one's paying for this"
2-Everyone else that is not tech-savvy: wouldn't pay because
2.1-Wouldn't know this exists
2.2-Doesn't care
2.3-Doesn't want to spend 30 bucks that could be spent elsewhere.
Raiden85Really is, because if MS can see people paying for this then they'll be charging for the large yearly updates like 24H2 next.
I don't see it happening? I don't think Microsoft is that crazy to go after the home users that just passively keep Windows' userbase up. Plus, Windows isn't that relevant as a direct money generator (you could argue it makes up for that by being a platform for Microsoft to offer a number of things on and such, but straight up Windows licensing isn't generating that much revenue), so I don't think they want to make home users look into alternative operating systems just for trying to squeeze two more bucks out of them. Then again, some of Microsoft's moves in the past have been eyebrow-raising so we'll see what happens if it happens.
WirkoHere's how problems will be solved in the real world...

LOL, though true enough, people do buy those. Windows 10 IoT Enterprise LTSC 2021's support ends on 2032, plenty of time.
mtosevI'm surprised that the price isn't higher. If someone asked me I would thought it would be higher.
Home users seems to only get the one year extension. Companies can get up to 3 years, but the price doubles each year. Education gets it for 1 dollar per user.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 01:29 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts