Well I just wanted to know where is nvidia goin!!
Nowhere, it's here to stay.
renaming old cards to new ones and then again the new Gtx275?....
There are mixed views on the "renaming old cards to new ones" part. Some say it is confusing, though ironically, the same group that makes these allegations comprises of individuals who are smart enough to make out if something is rebadged. My view is that as long as NVIDIA is being honest with pricing the cards, it should not affect anyone. It's not like it is asking its partners to sell 8800GT at say $120, and 9800GT at $140. Each rebadged SKU is staying at the price-point it's "predecessor" is staying at.
Regarding the GTX 275, no, it's not a rebadged SKU. Its specs don't match those of any other GTX 200 GPU.
Now its just trying to come up with same cards but just different clocks to face upto ATI For the new 4890 etc...
When the HD 4890 does come out, you will see exactly to what extant rebadging SKUs is institutionalized, and how both ATI and NVIDIA indulge in it.
why cant they come up with sumthing new?
It takes money (research and development) to come up with something new. If they can keep the existing architecture, keep providing performance increments facilitated by new manufacturing technologies, and also passing on the benefit of reduced manufacturing costs to you the consumer, then it's doing a pretty good job being a GPU vendor.
NVIDIA has the GT21x series 40 nm GPUs in development.
Then there is their gtx100 series??? I dnt think there was any need for it! I Guess Nvidia is completely losting and pullings its hair to just show ATI a sensless point!
P.S Dnt pick out mistakes not best at english!
There is no GTX100. There's a GTS 100, and G100 series. The objective is to give us a simple naming scheme. The 65 nm G9x GPUs were intended to make the GeForce 9 series, and the 55 nm G9x, its successors. The GTS200/100/G100...will be characterized by the 55 nm GPUs.
yea he beat me to it as well
