zekrahminator
McLovin
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2006
- Messages
- 9,066 (1.32/day)
- Location
- My house.
Processor | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Brisbane @ 2.8GHz (224x12.5, 1.425V) |
---|---|
Motherboard | Gigabyte sumthin-or-another, it's got an nForce 430 |
Cooling | Dual 120mm case fans front/rear, Arctic Cooling Freezer 64 Pro, Zalman VF-900 on GPU |
Memory | 2GB G.Skill DDR2 800 |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire X850XT @ 580/600 |
Storage | WD 160 GB SATA hard drive. |
Display(s) | Hanns G 19" widescreen, 5ms response time, 1440x900 |
Case | Thermaltake Soprano (black with side window). |
Audio Device(s) | Soundblaster Live! 24 bit (paired with X-530 speakers). |
Power Supply | ThermalTake 430W TR2 |
Software | XP Home SP2, can't wait for Vista SP1. |
While NVIDIA wanted to originally bring television to 1440p resolution, the professional industry wants to move straight to 4096x2160. The move to 4096x2160 not only brings an unprecedented quality level, but also an unprecedented level of rendering power required. Each frame of whatever movie is rendered in 4096x2160 has been estimated to take 50MB, and a decoder would have to be extremely powerful. Editing such an enormous video would require even more power. Cameras that support this amazing resolution should be announced soon. The difference between 4096x2160 and standard DV can be seen in this chart.
View at TechPowerUp Main Site
View at TechPowerUp Main Site
Last edited by a moderator: