- Joined
- Apr 12, 2010
- Messages
- 1,359 (0.25/day)
Processor | Core i7 920 |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus P6T v2 |
Cooling | Noctua D-14 |
Memory | OCZ Gold 1600 |
Video Card(s) | Powercolor PCS+ 5870 |
Storage | Samsung SpinPoint F3 1 TB |
Display(s) | Samsung LE-B530 37" TV |
Case | Lian Li PC-B25F |
Audio Device(s) | N/A |
Power Supply | Thermaltake Toughpower 700w |
Software | Windows 7 64-bit |
OP = thread starter.
I'm not bothered that no one else can play CSS on my CSS account whilst I play CSS as my example, but when I play CSS, why can't say my brother play HL2 or Just Cause 2 or any other game locked into my account?
Because under the new definition of game "ownership" proposed by the companies employing DRM, you are stealing when you allow your brother access to your games: two people, two games. They want to clamp down on our ability to sell, lend or pass games on once we have finished with them, forget about all the bull relating to piracy, that's just a smokescreen.
That said, I agree with Mussels, the advantages of Steam outweigh the hindrances it entails and whilst your objection is valid, it goes against Valve's primary objective, so you are unlikely to see any movement in this regard.