NEW - 3DMark 11 Compilation

[bear jesus]

screenies added? no
links to orb? no

sorry if this looks like im picking on you bear but im just making a point.

i don't really give a shit athlon, but you said and I quote


yes you posted my results because I POSTED CORRECTLY and yet you also post results when others dont post correctly, fella, make a topic make sense, dont just make it up.

no problem I'm happy to be useful I thought athlon was talking to 20mmrain though as he had not posed like asked but i admit i did the same for the results i did not want put in the table so i thought he could have been doing the same.

But one other thing though

Post Your 3DMark 11 Score along with CPU-Z,GPU-Z and your Desktop Date and Time...This will be listed in single and multiple gpu configurations.
If you want your card listed here be sure to post all in Table format like below.

name|gpu|clocks|score|cpu

I didn't see anything about a link to the orb there but I admit i did not read it the first time as i posted a pic without the gpuz and cpuz widows in it but also as i have and others are using the free version every time we do a run the old result is wiped and the new one added so i could only ever link to one and so far i have done about 12 runs and intend to do more.

Has the part about the link been edited out?

*edit* God damn it i removed the screen shots accidentally, at the time my scores were added they were still there. i possibly attached and put the pic in the post then like a silly bear removed the attachment so the pic only lasted for a while

 

[deathmore]

my 3dmark11 scores

deathmore /core I7 920 @ 3.3ghz /Evga blackops edition gtx 580 /@ 797/1013/1594/ p6161

 

[Athlon2K15]

@bear your results are fine,i seen the screenshots you had,he's just trolling dont mind him

 

[bear jesus]

@bear your results are fine,i seen the screenshots you had,he's just trolling dont mind him

But he did make me notice my mistake so I'm happy, i fixed my posts as i think it's nice to see voltages and other speeds on the cpuz in everyone's screen shots.... although I'm jealous that my 965 needs a load of voltage to reach 4ghz with a 205mhz bus as others get there so much easier

 

[Easy Rhino]

dx11 only FTL :shadedshu

 

[douglatins]

1st!!... wait no deathmore here i comeee

douglatins|GTX580|772/2004|core i7 920 @ 4.0GHz

 

[Mydog]

Mydog |MSI 5970@ 1000/1300 + 2x 5870@ 1020/1330 | p14774 | core I7 980X @ 4.3ghz

 

[douglatins]

Mydog /core I7 980X @ 4.3ghz /MSI 5970@ 1000/1300 + 2x 5870@ 1020/1330 p14774
http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/5906/3d11p14774.jpg

Okidoky, BLAMO

WHY DOES THE PRO costs 1K!?!?!!

 

[Athlon2K15]

dx11 only FTL :shadedshu

it's not called 3dmark 11 for no reason

 

[EarthDog]

Earthdog |Galaxy GTX470 @ 775/1500/1800 | p5141 | W3570 @ 3.3ghz (stock)

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/33947



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

 

[wolf]

dx11 only FTL :shadedshu

let me guess, you want to bench your ION sytem?

I tried my laptop too but I'm met with crashes at the physics and combined tests.

 

[johnnyfiive]

Here is my first run with the CPU at 4.2 and the 6870's are default clocks. Going to up the clocks later tonight and see what I can come up with. 9k should be doable, we'll see.

johnnyfiive|6870 x2|900/1050|7885|i7 950 @ 4.2

I'm coming for ya 2DividedbyZero

 

[damric]

Updated, I squeezed a wee bit more out of my HD 5750

damric / HD 5750 @ 959 core 1350 memory / P2790 / Phenom II 955 @ 4040MHZ



http://3dmark.com/3dm11/34907

 

[Easy Rhino]

it's not called 3dmark 11 for no reason

3dmark 2011

 

[dir_d]

dir_d|5870|1000/1300|4737|965BE@4Ghz
Got home and ran it

 

[erocker]

3dmark 2011

Surely someone with a rig like yours, made for things such a video playback, file serving, etc. would be very interested in a 3D benchmark such as this. It's a conspiracy between Futuremark, Obama and Ronald McDonald that you cannot use this program. You cannot win.

 

[TotalChaos]

TotalChaos|5850x2|765/1125|6257|1055T@3.5Ghz

 

[EarthDog]

I assume thats Crossfire? ^

EDIT: Wow after reading the wonky submission, it is. A simple x2 after the card type doesnt suffice?

 

[EastCoasthandle]

Earthdog |Galaxy GTX470 @ 775/1500/1800 | p5141 | W3570 @ 3.3ghz (stock)

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/33947

[url]http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/7158/3d115141.th.jpg[/URL]

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Hey could you also provide screenshot of your Extreme score as well?
Using the exact same OC's, etc.

 

[TotalChaos]

LMAO just for you i changed it

 

[EarthDog]

Hey could you also provide screenshot of your Extreme score as well?

I dont really have a SS that would qualify for this thread, just the validation URL...

X1648
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/34308

 

[Easy Rhino]

Surely someone with a rig like yours, made for things such a video playback, file serving, etc. would be very interested in a 3D benchmark such as this. It's a conspiracy between Futuremark, Obama and Ronald McDonald that you cannot use this program. You cannot win.

i know! clearly they have created a program specifically to piss me off. im writing my congressman!

 

[wolf]

Surely someone with a rig like yours, made for things such a video playback, file serving, etc. would be very interested in a 3D benchmark such as this. It's a conspiracy between Futuremark, Obama and Ronald McDonald that you cannot use this program. You cannot win.

don't forget the oil companies.

I'm going to wait for a a little while while they work out some bugs, then buy it and bench the entry preset too, I have a feeling it will be somewhat smooth.

on the gaming tests on the Performance preset I average between 4 and 6 FPS

 

[jlewis02]

Update please
NEW - 3DMark 11 Compilation

 

[EastCoasthandle]

Guys it appears that ATI users currently don't have a gpu profile in the whql drivers for 3D11. It will mean one of 2 things.
1. One is forth coming and we will see a performance boost just like we did with Vantage and 3D06
2. Nothing, I may have missed it.
So the results so far maybe a little skewed until ATI users get that profile.