How easy was it to cable up? If using a large air cooler would it cover any plugs for CPU power making it a bit tricky for example.
I will be using a Noctua NH-C14 for future reviews. I am using on old CM690 to test in, and with that cooler mounted on THIS board, I had no issues installing the board into the case with the cooler mounted, nor connecting any cables. Even screwing the board into the chassis was no problem...just needed a long screwdriver(10cm from handle to tip) to clear the heatsink
any pictures of the leds on?
Sure! I'll upload one for you in a bit.
Are you using memtest for stability check? How many runs?
Also, would love to see some more MBs reviews (AM3, specifically).
Memtest is only just the start. For me to consider a system stable, it must be able to pass ANY TEST. That means Prime95, IntelBurnTest, OCCT, and anything else you want. Talking to other reviewers from other websites, my testing routine is one of the most extensive, albeit time consuming.
Really nice review Cadaveca! The only ting I'd like to see is a few more performance tests for overclocking. Otherwise, I'm impressed!
I partially agree, however, because overclocked results are more dependant on the other components(cpu/mem/vga), it didn't seem practical except to prove the platform stable.
That said though, this is the first review, and I look forward to bringing everyone what they want to see, so I will definitely keep this in mind as the format matures.
Nice review, but it would be nice if in the future reviewers included the settings at which the highest stable overclock is achieved. And i mean all the settings. Vcore, pll, memory voltage, etc...
I am almost always on the forums whne I'm awake, so please feel free to ask me any direct questions, and I'll gladly give you the answers.
The 4.2ghz overclock required 1.3 V on the cpu, 1.9 V on the pll, 1.69 V on memory, and 1.39 V on the IMC/QPI. I was easily able to run 4 sticks @ 2110 MHz 8-8-8-24, before running into the cpu's limit.
Changing the sticks to ones based on PSC ICs allowed a max of 2408 MHz 8-11-8, but this wasn't fully stable, again due to cpu limitations. Of course, this also required a different cpu, an i7 870, in order to gain access to the higher divider not available to the i5 760.
Nice thorough review, but now is a really bad time to buy an LGA1156 board, so I'd have to say that I disagree with the high score given.
I understand your perspective here, but keep in mind that when reviewing a product, I am very focused on the product's merits on it's own, in comparison to it's direct competition. That means it's ranking is only valid when considering motherboards and thier functionality as a basis for a system, and not overall performance, as I am not reviewing the CPU nor the memory.
I stand by my numbers. There are no functionality issues with the hardware itself, and the only negative points have no bearing on daily usage, or performance, and as such, the board is highly ranked in my books, and it WILL be hard for other boards to achieve such a high score. The Gene clocked cpu and memory higher than the other samples, and behaved exactly as expected, with not a single hiccup in setup or usage. As a P55-based product, I truly feel this is one of the best options for this platform.