- Joined
- Oct 6, 2005
- Messages
- 10,242 (1.46/day)
- Location
- Granite Bay, CA
System Name | Big Devil |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core i5-2500K |
Motherboard | ECS P67H2-A2 |
Cooling | XSPC Rasa | Black Ice GT Stealth 240 | XSPC X2O 750 | 2x ACF12PWM | PrimoChill White 7/16" |
Memory | 2x4GB Corsair Vengeance LP Arctic White 1600MHz CL9 |
Video Card(s) | EVGA GTX 780 ACX SC |
Storage | Intel 520 Series 180GB + WD 1TB Blue |
Display(s) | HP ZR30W 30" 2650x1600 IPS |
Case | Corsair 600T SE |
Audio Device(s) | Xonar Essence STX | Sennheisser PC350 "Hero" Modded | Corsair SP2500 |
Power Supply | ABS SL 1050W (Enermax Revolution Rebadge) |
Software | Windows 8.1 x64 Pro w/ Media Center |
Benchmark Scores | Ducky Year of the Snake w/ Cherry MX Browns & Year of the Tiger PBT Keycaps | Razer Deathadder Black |
I've heard many reviewers state that there is no difference between a SATA 2.0 cable and a SATA 3.0 cable other than the marking on them. I have heard others say that there are differences. I'd definitely like a definitive answer on this.
Found this from SATA-Irg:
They definitely mention that SATA 2.0 cables may not live up to SATA 3.0 drives, but there doesn't seem to be a set standard for the cabling, at least in that document. Is there any other information out there?
Found this from SATA-Irg:
SATA 6Gb/s Cabling
The same cables and connectors used for current SATA implementations can be
used to connect SATA 6Gb/s devices. SATA-IO recommends utilizing quality
components to ensure data integrity and robust operation at the fast 6Gb/s transfer rate.
Cables already at the threshold of 3Gb/s operating margins may experience lower
performance than expected at 6Gb/s due to an increased number of resends.
The SATA Revision 3.0 spec addresses this issue by defining the Compliance
Interconnect Channel (CIC). The CIC is outlined as a mathematical model of a
compliant channel as well as an insertion/return loss plot defining the most extreme
losses the system can sustain and still be compliant. Note that the CIC does not specify
the components to be used in a system but rather the overall performance and quality
the system must exhibit.
Cable vendors will want to consider removing any question of quality by marking
their packaging to explicitly state a product's 6Gb/s CIC compliance. Vendors can also
have their cables added to the Integrators List on the SATA-IO web site. End-users, for
their part, will want to consult the Integrators List – this list is available to the public –
before buying new cabling.
They definitely mention that SATA 2.0 cables may not live up to SATA 3.0 drives, but there doesn't seem to be a set standard for the cabling, at least in that document. Is there any other information out there?