no. the people who make the content will stop producing it. that means there will be nothing to steal because the people who are paid to make it will simply stop making it.
This is overly simplifying things. There will always be a demand for creative works, no matter how many people copy it and those people making the creative works will still earn.
Not all work is commissioned. Some is very generic and sold through a service. When someone DLs a sample of my work and uses it for profit I get nothing. Only when they pay my distributor do I get a cut. Savvy?
Now if I can prove someone used my art without paying for it I can sue. But I cannot afford to do that all the time. It happens a LOT. But my distributer can. They are like my pimp.
I bolded the important part. I agree with this to an extent, other people should not
Profit from your work. The argument is not black and white, there are also people who pirate things not for profit.
And currently, i work my ass off so other people who do very little can profit from it. This will always be the case... My boss is a pirate god damn it! (along with all the CEOs, shareholders, Bankers, etc)
Its the commie education system.
Communism is the opposite of absolute Capitalism. Absolute capitalism (what to US is moving to) puts the money and power into the hands of the very few. Communism stifles creativity and production. Both are just as open to corruption.
Before you say that you are against communism in all forms and only pro-capitalism, take a look at your armed forces or your social security system. Although i guess these could be classes as socialist policies as communism is economic.
I see wut u did there
Who decides who earns what?*
Surely the very act of creating a home and cultivating the land means you have earned it.
*Rhetorical question obviously, it's banks,government and people who buy up houses and land in order to make profit.
There was an interesting news article here not long ago. A family had a large plot of worthless land allocated to them (on a lease based system) They worked their asses off and made the land fertile and productive. It was then decided to take the land off them as it was near the end of the lease. Needless to say, they came out with shotguns and grenades.
Supply, demand and money. Communism, which is exactly what you are talking about is rather dead. I suppose you could always take up some sort of revolution and have folks join your communistic rebellion against the profiteers... Or just go stand somewhere with the so called "99%"
Communism is alive and well in the majority of the world. see my above comments.
There has to be a balance, it should not be one or the other.
value is determined by demand. economics 101. demand creates supply and pushes innovation. economics 201. laws do not create supply. laws do not determine demand or value. philosophy 101. people must not teach this stuff anymore.
It's fairly easy to create artificial demand and artificially inflate prices, especially if you have a monopoly.
you think only people who lack money steal? people shouldnt pay for shitty hollywood movies or music. but they also shouldnt watch them or listen to them and not pay for them. how is this a complicated matter? i weep for this young generation.
And you shouldn't be able to look directly at the queen without being royalty on punishment of having your eyes gouged out.