NVIDIA GeForce Kepler Packs Radically Different Number Crunching Machinery

1c3d0g · Feb 10, 2012

I have a feeling that NVIDIA will kill the competition this time around...Kepler sounds like a new Voodoo2, if y'all still remember that...

TheMailMan78 · Feb 10, 2012

This is odd. I go Nvidia and Nvidia starts to look like AMD. lol I can't win.

Listen if NVIDIA fails with the 700 series I take full responsibility. Its my fault for going green.

Benetanegia · Feb 10, 2012

arnoo1 said:
seriously 1536 shaders? thats 3 x times more than fermi

Not really because they dropped hot-clocks. From the persective of how many ops/cycle the chip can do GF100/110 could be seen as a 1024 SP part, and GF104/114 as a 768 SP part. So it's a 50% improvement over GF100 and 100% over GF104.

@ thread

What I mention to arnoo1 is normal and has happened on pretty much every generation. The "failure" at releasing fully enabled chips in the GTX400 line made look as if it didn't happen, at least performance wise since Fermi CUDA cores are not as fast or efficient (clock for clock) as those on previous Nvidia cards. But in the end if you look at the GTX580 it's pretty damn close to being 100% faster than GTX280/285. And GTX 560 Ti is close to 50% faster. This is what Nvidia tried with GF100 and GF104, but only ultimately achieved with GF110 and GF114.

Look here, i couldn't find a direct comparison since W1zz stopped benching DX10 cards:

On the left GTX 460 is similar to GTX285. On the right GTX580 is almost twice as fast as the GTX 460.

I don't know why people (all over the internet) are so reluctant to believe a similar thing could happen this time around. Only this time they won't have to disable parts in the first place. It's not a crazy thought at all. At least IMO.

m1dg3t · Feb 10, 2012

Info is starting to get better, still waiting

Price war's should be as fun as waiting for release, hopefully something fit's my buget so i can upgrade :eek:

Has Nvidia done a "If we can't beat 'em, join 'em" thing?

Benetanegia · Feb 10, 2012

jamsbong said:
Confirmed Nvidia is doing an ATI!

TheMailMan78 said:
This is odd. I go Nvidia and Nvidia starts to look like AMD. lol I can't win.

m1dg3t said:
Has Nvidia done a "If we can't beat 'em, join 'em" thing?

It's kind of an irrelevant point to discuss, but why do so many people say something like this? I just can't make any sense of it.

AMD

- Gone with scalar shaders (which Nvidia has been doing for 6+ years)
- Gone modular with CU (which Nvidia has been doing since Fermi, 2 years now)
- GPGPU friendly architecture and caches (Fermi)

Nvidia

- Dropped hot-clocks

And Nvidia is doing what AMD? Come on, they dropped hot-clocks that's it, arguably because slower cores (yet smaller and in 2x amount) are more area/wattage efficient in 28nm, which did not necessarily apply to 40 nm, 65nm, 55nm...

The only interesting thing is that both GPU vendors have converged in a very similar architecture now that both pursue the same goals and are contrained by the same physical limits.

EDIT: ^^ And that's why I love tech BTW and specially GPUs. It's pure engineering. Solving an specific "problem" (rendering) in the best way they can, and looking 2 different vendors solving it so differently, but with so similar results has been very fun to watch, maybe in the coming years it will not be as fun as they converge more and more. Kind of like CPUs are mostly equal and there's a lot less to discuss (Bulldozer was a fresh attempt tho, yet it failed). I love tech anyway.

xenocide · Feb 10, 2012

Benetanegia said:
It's kind of an irrelevant point to discuss, but why do so many people say something like this? I just can't make any sense of it.

AMD

- Gone with scalar shaders (which Nvidia has been doing for 6+ years)
- Gone modular with CU (which Nvidia has been doing since Fermi, 2 years now)
- GPGPU friendly architecture and caches (Fermi)

Nvidia

- Dropped hot-clocks

And Nvidia is doing what AMD? Come on, they dropped hot-clocks that's it, arguably because slower cores (yet smaller and in 2x amount) are more area/wattage efficient in 28nm, which did not necessarily apply to 40 nm, 65nm, 55nm...

The only interesting thing is that both GPU vendors have converged in a very similar architecture now that both pursue the same goals and are contrained by the same physical limits.

People just look at the number of Shader's and go "zomg copying AMD!!?#"

Benetanegia · Feb 10, 2012

xenocide said:
People just look at the number of Shader's and go "zomg copying AMD!!?#"

Yes I guess, but it's so obvious that Nvidia would eventually go to 4 digit numbers, if not this gen (i.e 1024 SP "Fermi"), in the next one at least. Anyway if AMD had followed using VLIW we'd probably talking about 3000 SPs, so again they wouldn't "look the same". So I stand by my point. If at all, AMD did an "Nvidia". Yet it's not true as I said.

TheMailMan78 · Feb 10, 2012

For some reason I just think NVIDIA is gonna bring a bag of fail next round for no other reason then I bought one.

m1dg3t · Feb 10, 2012

I'm curious why they went with a 256 bit us as opppsed to 384? I thought with the large amount's of DDR5 you want max "throughput"? :confused:

Maybe cuz it's the "budget" board? Anyway's i'm still waiting

MxPhenom 216 · Feb 10, 2012

TheMailMan78 said:
For some reason I just think NVIDIA is gonna bring a bag of fail next round for no other reason then I bought one.

I just hope there geometry and tesselation performance is still very good like it was with fermi.

MxPhenom 216 · Feb 10, 2012

m1dg3t said:
I'm curious why they went with a 256 bit us as opppsed to 384? I thought with the large amount's of DDR5 you want max "throughput"? Maybe cuz it's the "budget" board? Anyway's i'm still waiting

well its because of the memory size. 2GB. if it was 3gb then 384bit would work.

m1dg3t · Feb 10, 2012

nvidiaintelftw said:
well its because of the memory size. 2GB. if it was 3gb then 384bit would work.

Wasn't Nvidia first to use 384 bit back in the day? Then it was with only 1g IIRC :confused:

MxPhenom 216 · Feb 10, 2012

m1dg3t said:
Wasn't Nvidia first to use 384 bit back in the day? Then it was with only 1g IIRC

no? well the 4 series at like 1280mb of ram and 1536mb(i think on the 580) and its 384bit.

creepingdeath · Feb 10, 2012

radarblade said:
Seems like Nvidia's pretty prepped up to wipe AMD off the slate! But what would be the TDP on these things? Preferably lesser than the earlier 480 and 580 heaters.

Uh, with these specifications it definitely will NOT beat Tahiti. There's always price though right? Hotclocking is gone, hence the shader units are substantially weaker than those found in Fermi.

GK110 is the one we want and since it has just taped out, it will not be released until Q3. Sorry green fans

creepingdeath · Feb 10, 2012

1c3d0g said:
I have a feeling that NVIDIA will kill the competition this time around...Kepler sounds like a new Voodoo2, if y'all still remember that...

I have a feeling that the specs are black and white. GK110 will be the one to wait for and its not coming till Q3.

Benetanegia · Feb 10, 2012

creepingdeath said:
Uh, with these specifications it definitely will NOT beat Tahiti. There's always price though right? Hotclocking is gone, hence the shader units are substantially weaker than those found in Fermi.

Yes shaders are going to be exactly half as powerful as in Fermi. Hence this chip still has 50% more than the GTX580. Still not enough info to say one way or another.

But since we are at making absurd claims with no posible way to back up: this chip WILL beat Tahiti, and by a good margin too.

creepingdeath · Feb 10, 2012

Benetanegia said:
Yes shaders are going to be exactly half as powerful as in Fermi. Hence this chip still has 50% more than the GTX580. Still not enough info to say one way or another.

But since we are at making absurd claims with no posible way to back up: this chip WILL beat Tahiti, and by a good margin too.

I'll call you and raise you by stating, "this will be nvidia's 5000 FX all over again " :cool:

Just kidding with that

In all seriousness, the specs are not impressive. It may come close to the 580 at a lower cost and better efficiency, but based on specs it is not a tahiti killer. Gotta wait for GK110 which just taped out. Thats the one i'll wait for, i'll be doing another round of upgrades around the September timeframe anyway.

m1dg3t · Feb 10, 2012

creepingdeath said:
I'll call you and raise you by stating, "this will be nvidia's 5000 FX all over again "

I hope not! Those were shitty time's

Prima.Vera · Feb 10, 2012

That's nice, but how about something similar to AMD's MLAA straight from the driver??? I I play a lot of older games that don't support AA, and with MLAA is a delight.

m1dg3t · Feb 10, 2012

Prima.Vera said:
That's nice, but how about something similar to AMD's MLAA straight from the driver??? I I play a lot of older games that don't support AA, and with MLAA is a delight.

What, what is MLAA? It's useless, ATi has no innovative feature's like that! :rolleyes:

Steevo · Feb 10, 2012

7970

3.79 TFLOPS Single Precision compute power
947 GFLOPS Double Precision compute power

Twice as much math processing power with only a 25% increase in "core" count and 25Mhz less core speed?

If these are official numbers from the green camp I feel sorry for their PR department making efficiency statements.

Crap Daddy · Feb 10, 2012

Steevo said:
7970

3.79 TFLOPS Single Precision compute power
947 GFLOPS Double Precision compute power

Twice as much math processing power with only a 25% increase in "core" count and 25Mhz less core speed?

If these are official numbers from the green camp I feel sorry for their PR department making efficiency statements.

Let's remember the 6970 has 2.7 TFlops while GTX580 has something like 1.5 so if we are talking about gaming benchmarks I don't think that's a factor.

blibba · Feb 10, 2012

m1dg3t said:
Wasn't Nvidia first to use 384 bit back in the day? Then it was with only 1g IIRC

First GPU to use a 384-bit bus was the G80, as used in the 8800GTX and 8800 Ultra. It didn't have 1GB of memory though, because it had a 384-bit bus...

The GTX550 was the first (and so far only) card to break the evenly filled memory rule. It has 1GB through a 192-bit bus.

Benetanegia · Feb 10, 2012

creepingdeath said:
It may come close to the 580 at a lower cost and better efficiency, but based on specs it is not a tahiti killer. Gotta wait for GK110 which just taped out. Thats the one i'll wait for, i'll be doing another round of upgrades around the September timeframe anyway.

Funny, because based on specs this is not only a Tahiti killer, but a Tahiti killer, raper and shitting on his tomb kind of killer, if that makes any sense. Of course that's ony based on the specs, so it' won't materialize as such.

Be honest and say that because it is 256 bit, YOU think it's not going to be faster than GTX580 or something. Because based on specs, all of them, the card has 2x the crunching power than GTX580 (2.9 vs 1.5 Gflops). Twice as much texture power (128 vs 64) and 33% more memory, just to name a few.

I wouldn't even pay too much attention to the claim that GK110 just taped out BTW. "They" say that GK100 was canned, but there's absolutely no proof of that. "They" never knew when GK104 taped out either. Plus in 2010 by this time of the year there was also a chip called GF110 in the works, and based on when it was released (October 2010), its tape out had to happen around Feb/March too. It's posible that GK100 still exists and will be released soon after GK104, which is what many rumors say. Rumors from sources that turned out to be correct about GK104 specs several months ago, if we are to believe these specs.

Steevo said:
7970

3.79 TFLOPS Single Precision compute power
947 GFLOPS Double Precision compute power

Twice as much math processing power with only a 25% increase in "core" count and 25Mhz less core speed?

If these are official numbers from the green camp I feel sorry for their PR department making efficiency statements.

That's double precision* only and a huge improvement over GF104, both are capped because they are the mainstream parts. GF104 was capped at 1/12 the SP amount. GK104 is 1/6, which is a nice improvement for the performance part (for example in previous generations AMD didn't even support DP on anything but high-end). The high-end chip will feature 1/2 ratio and if Tahiti's number is really true (I thought Tahiti could do 1/2 DP :confused:

), it will most definitely decimate it at DP performance.

*On SP 2.9 is definitely not half of 3.79 and like Crap Daddy said the GTX 580 had around 1.5 Gflops. Claimed theoretical GFlops means very little, except for comparing two chips using identical architecture. Obviously GK104 is not going to be 2x as fast as the GTX580 as the GFlops number suggest, or TMUs, but it will most definitely beat it by a good amount. How much? Look to previous gens and compare GTX560 Ti to GTX285. There's your most probable answer.

creepingdeath · Feb 10, 2012

Benetanegia said:
Funny, because based on specs this is not only a Tahiti killer, but a Tahiti killer, raper and shitting on his tomb kind of killer, if that makes any sense. Of course that's ony based on the specs, so it' won't materialize as such.

Be honest and say that because it is 256 bit, YOU think it's not going to be faster than GTX580 or something. Because based on specs, all of them, the card has 2x the crunching power than GTX580 (2.9 vs 1.5 Gflops). Twice as much texture power (128 vs 64) and 33% more memory, just to name a few.

I wouldn't even pay too much attention to the claim that GK110 just taped out BTW. "They" say that GK100 was canned, but there's absolutely no proof of that. "They" never knew when GK104 taped out either. Plus in 2010 by this time of the year there was also a chip called GF110 in the works, and based on when it was released (October 2010), its tape out had to happen around Feb/March too. It's posible that GK100 still exists and will be released soon after GK104, which is what many rumors say. Rumors from sources that turned out to be correct about GK104 specs several months ago, if we are to believe these specs.

That's double precision* only and a huge improvement over GF104, both are capped because they are the mainstream parts. GF104 was capped at 1/12 the SP amount. GK104 is 1/6, which is a nice improvement for the performance part (for example in previous generations AMD didn't even support DP on anything but high-end). The high-end chip will feature 1/2 ratio and if Tahiti's number is really true (I thought Tahiti could do 1/2 DP ), it will most definitely decimate it at DP performance.

*On SP 2.9 is definitely not half of 3.79 and like Crap Daddy said the GTX 580 had around 1.5 Gflops. Claimed theoretical GFlops means very little, except for comparing two chips using identical architecture. Obviously GK104 is not going to be 2x as fast as the GTX580 as the GFlops number suggest, or TMUs, but it will most definitely beat it by a good amount. How much? Look to previous gens and compare GTX560 Ti to GTX285. There's your most probable answer.

LOL

The fanboy is strong with this one. If GK104 cures cancer and is 20x faster than 7970 great! I'll buy one.

Unfortunately the reality is that the shader architecture of the GK104 is vastly different than that of Fermi, it takes 3 times the number of Kepler shader units to equal a Fermi Shader unit. because shader clocks will be equal to raster clocks on the Kepler. Hotclocking is gone, that is the fallacy of your argument that you stupidly don't realize because you can't see past your fanboy eyeglasses. Also, just so you know, Tflops is not a meaningful measure of performance.

But hey whatever helps you sleep at night!! Hopefully, Jen-Hsun Huang will give you a hug before you go to bed at night.

System Name	TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor	RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard	Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling	MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory	ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2666 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s)	MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage	256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s)	LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case	Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s)	Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply	Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse	SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard	Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software	Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores	Benching is for bitches.

System Name	m1dg3t \| DeathBox \| HairPi 3
Processor	3570k @ 4.0 1.15v BIOS \| q9550 @ 3.77 1.325v BIOS
Motherboard	Asrock z77e iTX \| p5q Dlx 2301 BIOS
Cooling	Custom Water \| D-14 & HR-03gt \| Passive HSF
Memory	Samsung MV-3V4G3D 4g x 2 @ 1866 1.35v \| OcZ RpR 2g x 4 @ 1067 2.2v
Video Card(s)	MSi 7950 tf3 @1000 / 1350 \| Asus 5870 V2 @ 900 / 1275
Storage	Adata sx900 256Gb / WD 2500 HHTZ \| WD 1001 FALS x 2
Display(s)	BenQ gw2750hm \| 46" Sharp Quatron
Case	BitFenix Prodigy - m0dd3d \| Antec Fusion Remote MAX
Audio Device(s)	Onboard Toslink > Yamaha HTR 6290 \| Xonar HDAV1.3 > Yamaha DSP z7
Power Supply	Ocz mXp700w \| Ocz zx850w \| Cannakit 5v 2.5a
Mouse	Logitech G700s \| Logitech G9x - Cable Repaired
Keyboard	TT Meka G1 - Black w Cherry Blacks\| Logitech G11
Software	Win7 Home \| Xp sp3 & Vista ultimate \| Raspbian
Benchmark Scores	Epeen!! Who needs epeen??

Processor	Intel i7-10700k
Motherboard	Gigabyte Aurorus Ultra z490
Cooling	Corsair H100i RGB
Memory	32GB (4x8GB) Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200MHz
Video Card(s)	MSI Gaming Trio X 3070 LHR
Display(s)	ASUS MG278Q / AOC G2590FX
Case	Corsair X4000 iCue
Audio Device(s)	Onboard
Power Supply	Corsair RM650x 650W Fully Modular
Software	Windows 10

System Name	TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor	RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard	Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling	MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory	ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2666 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s)	MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage	256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s)	LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case	Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s)	Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply	Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse	SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard	Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software	Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores	Benching is for bitches.

System Name	m1dg3t \| DeathBox \| HairPi 3
Processor	3570k @ 4.0 1.15v BIOS \| q9550 @ 3.77 1.325v BIOS
Motherboard	Asrock z77e iTX \| p5q Dlx 2301 BIOS
Cooling	Custom Water \| D-14 & HR-03gt \| Passive HSF
Memory	Samsung MV-3V4G3D 4g x 2 @ 1866 1.35v \| OcZ RpR 2g x 4 @ 1067 2.2v
Video Card(s)	MSi 7950 tf3 @1000 / 1350 \| Asus 5870 V2 @ 900 / 1275
Storage	Adata sx900 256Gb / WD 2500 HHTZ \| WD 1001 FALS x 2
Display(s)	BenQ gw2750hm \| 46" Sharp Quatron
Case	BitFenix Prodigy - m0dd3d \| Antec Fusion Remote MAX
Audio Device(s)	Onboard Toslink > Yamaha HTR 6290 \| Xonar HDAV1.3 > Yamaha DSP z7
Power Supply	Ocz mXp700w \| Ocz zx850w \| Cannakit 5v 2.5a
Mouse	Logitech G700s \| Logitech G9x - Cable Repaired
Keyboard	TT Meka G1 - Black w Cherry Blacks\| Logitech G11
Software	Win7 Home \| Xp sp3 & Vista ultimate \| Raspbian
Benchmark Scores	Epeen!! Who needs epeen??

NVIDIA GeForce Kepler Packs Radically Different Number Crunching Machinery

1c3d0g

TheMailMan78

Big Member

Benetanegia

New Member

m1dg3t

Benetanegia

New Member

xenocide

Benetanegia

New Member

TheMailMan78

Big Member

m1dg3t

MxPhenom 216

ASIC Engineer

MxPhenom 216

ASIC Engineer

m1dg3t

MxPhenom 216

ASIC Engineer

creepingdeath

New Member

creepingdeath

New Member

Benetanegia

New Member

creepingdeath

New Member

m1dg3t

Prima.Vera

m1dg3t

Steevo

Crap Daddy

blibba

Benetanegia

New Member

creepingdeath

New Member

System Name	Ryzen Reflection
Processor	AMD Ryzen 9 5900x
Motherboard	Gigabyte X570S Aorus Master
Cooling	2x EK PE360 \| TechN AM4 AMD Block Black \| EK Quantum Vector Trinity GPU Nickel + Plexi
Memory	Teamgroup T-Force Xtreem 2x16GB B-Die 3600 @ 14-14-14-28-42-288-2T 1.45v
Video Card(s)	Zotac AMP HoloBlack RTX 3080Ti 12G \| 950mV 1950Mhz
Storage	WD SN850 500GB (OS) \| Samsung 980 Pro 1TB (Games_1) \| Samsung 970 Evo 1TB (Games_2)
Display(s)	Asus XG27AQM 240Hz G-Sync Fast-IPS \| Gigabyte M27Q-P 165Hz 1440P IPS \| Asus 24" IPS (portrait mode)
Case	Lian Li PC-011D XL \| Custom cables by Cablemodz
Audio Device(s)	FiiO K7 \| Sennheiser HD650 + Beyerdynamic FOX Mic
Power Supply	Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum 850
Mouse	Razer Viper v2 Pro
Keyboard	Corsair K65 Plus 75% Wireless - USB Mode
Software	Windows 11 Pro 64-Bit

Processor	Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling	Noctua NH-D15
Memory	32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s)	ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage	2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s)	Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case	NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s)	Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply	Corsair 850W
Mouse	Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software	Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores	30FPS in NFS:Rivals

System Name	Compy 386
Processor	7800X3D
Motherboard	Asus
Cooling	Air for now.....
Memory	64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s)	7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage	Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs, 24TB Enterprise drives
Display(s)	55" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s)	ATI HDMI
Mouse	Logitech MX518
Keyboard	Razer
Software	A lot.
Benchmark Scores	Its fast. Enough.

System Name	Old Fart / Young Dude
Processor	2500K / 6600K
Motherboard	ASRock P67Extreme4 / Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 DDR3
Cooling	CM Hyper TX3 / CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory	16 GB Kingston HyperX / 16 GB G.Skill Ripjaws X
Video Card(s)	Gigabyte GTX 1050 Ti / INNO3D RTX 2060
Storage	SSD, some WD and lots of Samsungs
Display(s)	BenQ GW2470 / LG UHD 43" TV
Case	Cooler Master CM690 II Advanced / Thermaltake Core v31
Audio Device(s)	Asus Xonar D1/Denon PMA500AE/Wharfedale D 10.1/ FiiO D03K/ JBL LSR 305
Power Supply	Corsair TX650 / Corsair TX650M
Mouse	Steelseries Rival 100 / Rival 110
Keyboard	Sidewinder/ Steelseries Apex 150
Software	Windows 10 / Windows 10 Pro

System Name	The one under the desk / Media Centre
Processor	Xeon X3730@3.6GHZ / Phenom II X4 805E
Motherboard	Gigabyte P55M-UD4 / Asus Crosshair III
Cooling	Corsair H70 + 2*PWM fan / Arctic Alpine 11
Memory	16GB DRR3-1333 9-9-9-27 / 4GB Crucial DDR3-1333
Video Card(s)	Asus DirectCU GTX 680 / Gigabyte 560TI
Storage	Kingston V200 128GB, WD6400AAKS, 1TB Seagate 7.2kRPM SSHD / Kingston V200 128GB
Display(s)	Samsung 2343BW + Dell Ultrasharp 1600*1200 / 32" TV
Case	C'M' Silencio 550 / Some ancient SilverStone brushed aluminium media centre
Audio Device(s)	No.
Power Supply	Thermaltake Toughpower XT 675W / EVGA 430W
Mouse	Mionix Naos 3200 / Generic PS2
Keyboard	Roccat Ryos TKL Pro / Evoluent Mouse Friendly Keyboard (Logitech OEM)
Software	Windows 7 Ult x64
Benchmark Scores	Nah.