Just in case you missed it, I will say again, that was dust from my photo booth, not damage, but I do already know you can't read so I forgive you
Any chance you are going to be at CES, or better, your company will be there so I can talk to someone with some common sense?
@ full, take your fanboyism somewhere else.....that base is not grooved nor made by Noctua, so comparing apples to oranges really doesn't work here, although I am interested to see what reaper gets after a bit of use.
Also since you don't understand English, there is a difference between spreading TIM and compressing it.
Patience little grasshopper.
The micro world is a messy place and is the play ground of chaos theory with many nooks and cranny’s to be explored.
First off we have ordered several Noctua sinks as a baseline.
As you have supposedly sent me your sink on my shipping account we will compare it to never used production samples.
We will contact Noctua an acquire their base finish specification to see if all is with in spec.
It is a simple matter to visually locate and mark surface imperfections and then line them up with with the reflected light (white spots) to conclusively prove a link and have already duplicated this in with our in house sample sinks not a big deal with a microscope and a high resolution camera.
One angle may reveal 20 imperfections and another 40 it all depends upon the reflected angle move a few degrees one way or another and a different group will reveal themselves with the different reflected light angle. So a one angle shot is a tip of the iceberg view.
Machine tool chatter is a well understood issue and it is always there to some degree. In a worst case you can see it from 5 feet away in another you might need a microscope but it is always there.
A machinist will tune his spindle speed and feed rate to meet a particular spec and identical machines will produce different results, one might have a spindle speed of 8500 RPM and another might be 6500 RPM to produce the same result.
Machine tool pitting is closely related and commonly found on all machined pieces to one degree or another, back fill of material while cutting scores a piece so expecting perfect unbroken tool lines is unrealistic and does not happen in practice and generally partially controlled by the spec'd finish
Another issue to deal with is porosity. All aluminium and copper contains pores from casting depending on the quality of the casting will determine the frequency. It is a problem in welding and dealt with in some cases by hammering flat before welding. We have some pictured examples of this.
In any event as you want to hold us to a micro level standard we will accommodate and respond in detail.
Again the fact that pictured damage existed outside the contact contact area pretty much confirms that it existed prior to ICD application and just waiting further confirmation after receipt of the sink you have sent.
I would note that in fullinfusion's video and one moar's live video Friday night both had fine quality contact finishes and would more likely to reveal a problem than the more crude Noctua finish and both were about as good as you can get.
Semantic games aside we call our application method a "compression spread" that is, it is spread by compression and nothing is simpler or as easy as demonstrated by fullinfusion.