some of the differences are because they use the 3G/'eight' core model for the reference, and i've got the 4G quad core version..
i wasn't meaning that...
and the reference one in antutu is the one with the Snapdragon S600 the Octa is labeled Octa notice that the S4 in the chart has exactely, if not a bit above, the same score of the HTC One who has a S600, the Octa score even lower than that. (that was even a drama moment on some forums when the bench showed that the Samsung SOC was doing worse than the Qualcom SOC
![Er... what? o_O o_O]()
)
also not mentioning the Exynos 5 Octa is less common than the S600 one plus they are both quadcore (octacore is a overrated statement, ofc it has 8 physical cores but not the same revision 4A7+4A15 doesn't make 8 cores even if some dev tweak the proc to work on all eight cores, its pretty dangerous and not meant to be, heck even Samsung dev work on a solution to get all 8 cores working but nope the Ex5Octa will still be a failure and the S600 version is way better than that.
at last the last time i mailed the Antutu team to know if it was the Ex5Octa or the S600 S4 they answered S600 (unless they changed it)
also do you use Antutu 4.0 or Antutu x 4.0 1st one is from Antutu 2nd one is from Antutu Labs. and is a bit more harsh than the first (i do 21946 in Antutu 4.0)