Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores

[YautjaLord]

@GreiverBlade

Wiz OC'd single GTX 760 DCII to 1175 GPU base clock/1241 GPU Boost clock. I'd leave the mem OC'ing entirely, just raise the GPU base & boost clocks, you say? 1050MHZ base, 1120MHz boost clocks?

 

[GreiverBlade]

well with the 770 i moved only the base clock which move the boost accordingly to the original ratio (funny enough my 770 was 1268 base at max) since i had 460-5850-580 448core-6950-7950-7870ghz-580 SLI-460 HAWK-770-270-580-270X then 290 i can't really remember my 770 data mmhhh maybe in Valley thread i did post a 770 result but here i didn't

2640 GreiverBlade GTX 770 1268/1850 Xeon E3-1275V2
the VRAM clocked quite good tho

 

[YautjaLord]

I can only get the Boost clock slider thingy in GPU Tweak, wtf? lol In Advanced i get Max GPU voltage, Power Target (@ 100%), Frame rate target, etc... No base clock visible for a f*ckin mile. If i'll go for 1120MHz Boost clock, it means the base clock will be adjusted accordingly? I get 1092MHz Boost clock when clicking on pre-configured Gaming profile of the app.

 

[GreiverBlade]

I can only get the Boost clock slider thingy in GPU Tweak, wtf? lol In Advanced i get Max GPU voltage, Power Target (@ 100%), Frame rate target, etc... No base clock visible for a f*ckin mile. If i'll go for 1120MHz Boost clock, it means the base clock will be adjusted accordingly? I get 1092MHz Boost clock when clicking on pre-configured Gaming profile of the app.

always used MSI Afterburner even for my ASUS GTX 580 Matrix Platinum SLI setup xD (tried GPU Tweak but didn't liked it)

 

[YautjaLord]

always used MSI Afterburner even for my ASUS GTX 580 Matrix Platinum SLI setup xD (tried GPU Tweak but didn't liked it)

Yup, my 1st impression of this app is same for now. I'd give it a go, see where i'll get with it. Gonna test the pre-config'd Gaming profile for now. How high to set fan speed? 50%?

*EDIT*

OC'd this beast, here's the result:

GPU-Z dump with new clocks:

Fan speed @ 50%, Power target @ 105%. CPU-Z stuff - what you saw in CPU-Z 1.71.0 screen dump.

 

[newtekie1]

For the LOLs I ran this on my Kabini HTPC mini-PC I built. The result:

GPU Clocks: 600/1600

 

[GreiverBlade]

For the LOLs I ran this on my Kabini HTPC mini-PC I built. The result:

GPU Clocks: 600/1600

ahahah i almost wanted to run it on my mother 5350 build for the same reasons xD (but she has 1866 for RAM )

 

[The N]

7950 @1180/1675 mhz
i7 2600K @4.5GHz
Fury 1600mhz

 

[Borka3000]

Default Settings/clock. Gpu: Sapphire Dual-X R7 265 xfire.

 

[thespartanfish]

Hey you guys, I just got a new gtx 970 G1 running at 1556/4001 and got 1798. I haven't got a screenshot of this yet, I will send it later, but I did the bench at 1680x1050.

Can I run it 1080p on my monitor? And even if I can't is the difference from these tow resolutions big?

And finally for my curiosity, any 970 come close to 1798? (even though i kinda cheated )

P.S How comes all other cards have such low mem clock? Is what MSI afterburner shows me something different?

 

[Alechord]

Hi guys.
I just changed my motherboard so I decided to run some benchmarks again. Then, I spent couple hours overclocking my components and here are my results ;]

 

[mapesdhs]

thespartanfish writes:
> Hey you guys, I just got a new gtx 970 G1 running at 1556/4001 and got 1798. I haven't got a screenshot of this yet, I will send it later, but I did the bench at 1680x1050.

I think there's a new table now for results at that resolution. Check page 1 of this thread.


> Can I run it 1080p on my monitor? ...

We would need to know what model monitor you use.


> And even if I can't is the difference from these tow resolutions big?

Yes, it can be, though it depends on the task. 1080 is about 18% more fill area than 1050, but sometimes with AA involved this
can make all the difference as to whether a task remains within the available VRAM. Depends on the task.


> And finally for my curiosity, any 970 come close to 1798? (even though i kinda cheated )

Have a look back through this thread, and check the main result tables on page 1.


> P.S How comes all other cards have such low mem clock? Is what MSI afterburner shows me something different?

GPUs use quad data rate RAM, so tools like GPU-Z show the base clock, whereas other tools may show the effective clock. See:

http://www.geeks3d.com/20100613/tut...-clock-real-and-effective-speeds-demystified/

More info on the main wiki site & elsewhere.

Ian.

 

[thespartanfish]

thespartanfish writes:
> Hey you guys, I just got a new gtx 970 G1 running at 1556/4001 and got 1798. I haven't got a screenshot of this yet, I will send it later, but I did the bench at 1680x1050.

I think there's a new table now for results at that resolution. Check page 1 of this thread.


> Can I run it 1080p on my monitor? ...

We would need to know what model monitor you use.

> And even if I can't is the difference from these tow resolutions big?

Yes, it can be, though it depends on the task. 1080 is about 18% more fill area than 1050, but sometimes with AA involved this
can make all the difference as to whether a task remains within the available VRAM. Depends on the task.


> And finally for my curiosity, any 970 come close to 1798? (even though i kinda cheated )

Have a look back through this thread, and check the main result tables on page 1.


> P.S How comes all other cards have such low mem clock? Is what MSI afterburner shows me something different?

GPUs use quad data rate RAM, so tools like GPU-Z show the base clock, whereas other tools may show the effective clock. See:

http://www.geeks3d.com/20100613/tut...-clock-real-and-effective-speeds-demystified/

More info on the main wiki site & elsewhere.

Ian.

Thanks for the reply man! That's some useful stuff you said. I should probably invest in a 1080p monitor for gaming.

Anyway, I re-did the bench and took a screenshot this time. On MSI AB my clocks were 1580/4001 and I got a score of 1797 on my gigabyte G1 970. I maxed out my voltage at +87 but still the temp only went up to 68. This card is some good stuff.

 

[dcf-joe]

Here is the 1920x1080 score for my GTX 980. It is the Gigabyte G1 Gaming edition. I am done overclocking for now as I have met the soft voltage limit of my modded BIOS. I can push it further with the Maxwell Editor, but you can see that my fan is already at 80% just to keep it under 60 C.

It is at 1581 Mhz core and 1966 Mhz memory. My i7 2600K is at 4.8 GHz.

 

[MalcomXT]

Updated

1074 Score

AMD FX8350 4.96GHz

Sapphire Radeon HD7970 3GB 1225/1700

 

[fullinfusion]

For the LOLs I ran this on my Kabini HTPC mini-PC I built. The result:

GPU Clocks: 600/1600

You almost stalled out there lol, but What a run

 

[YautjaLord]

I went for following settings in GPU Tweak & it netted me with 29.6fps/740+ points: 1142MHz Boost clock, 6048MHz mem clock, 105% Power target, 59% fan speed, everything else default. Go for 1152MHz Boost clock or 1150MHz is max safest OC for my GPU on air? I wanna go for 30.xfps in this benchie with single GTX 760 DCII.

*EDIT*

0.1fps shy of 30fps:

GPU-Z screenie:

I can only hope i'll be able to OC like that when i'll have 2nd GTX 760 DCII.

 

[Alechord]

I just changed the memory and here's the result

The next thing will be the 3rd graphic card XD

 

[YautjaLord]

Got my 30.0fps but had to raise clocks to 1162MHz (GPU Boost) & 6108MHz for vRAM. It (GTX 760) didn't died on me so i'm thinking to raise vRAM clock to 6148MHz after i'll come back from work today, tomorrow will raise it to 6208MHz. See where it gets me. Complete settings:

GPU Clock: 1162MHz;
Mem clock: 6108MHz;
Max GPU voltage: 1.205v;
Power target: 105%;
Temp target: 85 degrees;
Fan1 speed: 59%;
Rest is @ default.

 

[FX-GMC]

Got my 30.0fps but had to raise clocks to 1162MHz (GPU Boost) & 6108MHz for vRAM. It (GTX 760) didn't died on me so i'm thinking to raise vRAM clock to 6148MHz after i'll come back from work today, tomorrow will raise it to 6208MHz. See where it gets me. Complete settings:

GPU Clock: 1162MHz;
Mem clock: 6108MHz;
Max GPU voltage: 1.205v;
Power target: 105%;
Temp target: 85 degrees;
Fan1 speed: 59%;
Rest is @ default.

Was there supposed to be an image there?

 

[YautjaLord]

Once i'll test it with 1172/6248MHz clocks, man. Sorry for any inconvenience, don't want to bombard this thread with way too many results each time i OC my 760 DCII. Merely tried to shed the light on what i'm doing, my bad.

 

[mapesdhs]

Here's a run with three 3GB GTX 580s (MSI Lightning Xtremes, 832MHz core):

Ian.

PS. I've updated my 'System Specs' drop-down. Hadn't realised it was so out of date...

 

[YautjaLord]

Went last night for 6248MHz for vRAM in GPU Tweak - didn't go, can say the same for 6218MHz; 6208MHz is highest stable throughout the entire benchmark & then GPU reverts to default clocks. Here's the highest (stable) score for this OC:

GPU Tweak settings:

GPU-Z:

Kick ass OC, atleast for me, shame it still doesn't scratch the 800 score, though.

 

[erixx]

 

[dcf-joe]

^ Did you forget 8x anti-aliasing?