• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Toshiba HK3R2 960 GB

W1zzard

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,927 (3.71/day)
System Specs
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
The Toshiba HK3R2 is an entry-level enterprise SSD that has been built around Toshiba's own controller and NAND chips. With its 960 GB capacity, it offers plenty of storage for all business applications, and our MySQL database testing reveals excellent performance in read-heavy scenarios.

Show full review
 
Last edited:
dwade

dwade

Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
345 (0.08/day)
System Specs
System Name Off-Brand PC System
Processor 2990WX
Motherboard X399
Cooling Wraithripper
Video Card(s) Vega 64
Benchmark Scores Less than Intel and Nvidia
They all pretty much perform the same. SSD is like RAM now.
 
Aquinus

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,171 (2.80/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Specs
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
Holy MySQL database performance, Batman!


I personally would like to see if the same holds true for PostgreSQL.
 
P

Pholostan

Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
11 (0.00/day)
Aquinus said:
Holy MySQL database performance, Batman!
Click to expand...
Yeah, that looks like an error. And a very high score for only 2 users is kinda pointless anyway.

Aquinus said:
I personally would like to see if the same holds true for PostgreSQL.
Click to expand...
Yes, that people refer to Mysql as a "proper" "enterprise" database always make me giggle. PostgreSQL is where it's at.
 
Aquinus

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,171 (2.80/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Specs
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
Pholostan said:
Yeah, that looks like an error. And a very high score for only 2 users is kinda pointless anyway.
Click to expand...
Not for reporting it isn't. If you have millions of records getting joined on several tables, you can bet that you'll want that kind of single connection performance. I've been writing a multi-threaded integration system for work and right now the bottleneck is on the single database connection. Now it would be nice if I could just speed up that one connection as managing several adds added complexity to the system. It could be a glitch, it might not be. I suspect that @W1zzard ran the benchmark more than once to ensure it wasn't a fluke.
 
W1zzard

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,927 (3.71/day)
System Specs
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Per Hansson

Per Hansson

Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
63 (0.01/day)
Location
Sweden
Wow, that database performance is interesting!
Could you please post a Atto benchmark run from this drive?
Even at lower queue depths than the default of 4 would be interesting.
 
R

RejZoR

Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.87/day)
System Specs
Would be nice if there was a HDD for reference on the graphs. So you at least have the idea of how much better SSD's are over HDD and then how much better is each SSD over other SSD's.
 
R-T-B

R-T-B

Supporter
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
21,528 (3.40/day)
System Specs
System Name Pioneer
Processor Ryzen R9 9950X
Motherboard GIGABYTE Aorus Elite X670 AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans...
Memory 64GB (4x 16GB) G.Skill Flare X5 @ DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) XFX RX 7900 XTX Speedster Merc 310
Storage Intel 905p Optane 960GB boot, +2x Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs
Display(s) 55" LG 55" B9 OLED 4K Display
Case Thermaltake Core X31
Audio Device(s) TOSLINK->Schiit Modi MB->Asgard 2 DAC Amp->AKG Pro K712 Headphones or HDMI->B9 OLED
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti Pro 850W
Mouse Logitech G305 Lightspeed Wireless
Keyboard WASD Code v3 with Cherry Green keyswitches + PBT DS keycaps
Software Gentoo Linux x64 / Windows 11 Enterprise IoT 2024
R

RejZoR

Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.87/day)
System Specs
RAM has no cell clearing issues (SSD's need TRIM), latencies in RAM are measured in nanoseconds (SSD's have it in milliseconds). And bandwidth is simply not comparable. What SSD has a bandwidth of 17 GB/s (bandwidth of DDR4 at 2133MHz)? I wish data drives would be a non volatile RAM. That would be kick ass and we'd finally solve the storage bottleneck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top