- Joined
- Jun 13, 2012
- Messages
- 1,351 (0.30/day)
Processor | i7-13700k |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus Tuf Gaming z790-plus |
Cooling | Coolermaster Hyper 212 RGB |
Memory | Corsair Vengeance RGB 32GB DDR5 7000mhz |
Video Card(s) | Asus Dual Geforce RTX 4070 Super ( 2800mhz @ 1.0volt, ~60mhz overlock -.1volts) |
Storage | 1x Samsung 980 Pro PCIe4 NVme, 2x Samsung 1tb 850evo SSD, 3x WD drives, 2 seagate |
Display(s) | Acer Predator XB273u 27inch IPS G-Sync 165hz |
Power Supply | Corsair RMx Series RM850x (OCZ Z series PSU retired after 13 years of service) |
Mouse | Logitech G502 hero |
Keyboard | Logitech G710+ |
Don't belivee me? Read this explanation by a retired AMD GPU engineer. This guy REALLY knows what he's talking about, he's no fanboy, he's an actual, bonna fide expert, his posts (go ahead and read through the thread and be prepared to be blown away) should silence the idiotic nVidia fanboyism on here:
@cadaveca Said pretty much what has been the truth about AMD for last 3 years. Claim stuff about their product but not living up to the claims, Claiming new gpu's when they are rebrands (aka 300 series they claim are new when in fact they are rebrands). In terms of pushing things in the industry, with new innovative things like shadowplay and g-sync. AMD has been 2 steps behind in those buying in to another company to do their recording and throwing together tech to compete with g-sync in 6 months and shipping it way before it was ready.I cannot at this juncture, because their offerings and false marketing and lies left a bitter taste in my mouth. Nevermind that they have failed to keep high-end SKUs in stock locally.
I made many AMD GPU purchases on tech they touted as new and all that, but not once did they ever actually deliver on it until many many months later, if at all (Crossfire (broken cursor), Eyefinity (First was Crossfire running Crysis on three dell 30-inch screens, never did work in native res although they had live demos running at LANs and when I was there, they wouldn't let me see the back of the monitors or PC) + (Frame time problems that I complained about for years before they actually acknowledged, and only did when they had ZERO choice), CTM (never made it to prime-time, precursor to DX12), Mantle (New CTM, backed by better code, still not used by more than 10 or so games right now).
It's not that I favor AMD, it is that they fail to deliver. While for me personally and my own purchases, NVidia HAS delivered. NVidia touts features...and they work! What a novel idea!
AMD in last few years has been most deceitful last 3-4 years with claims of xxx performance but giving what usually is a bit less.Both AMD and Nvidia are deceitful at times so I would rather wait until some DX12 games drop before deciding.
SO what AMD seems to have higher performance in a game that was original built using their 3rd party locked up API. That performance transfered over to DX12 which nvidia is starting from square 1. AMD had what almost a year heard start working with that were i doubt nvidia had more the a month or 2. Please don't say nvidia had access to source for a year, they have had access to DX11 but DX12 for it likely much difference story.
Last fact is this is ONE game in ALPHA stages, Doesn't mean very much.