Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores

[Christotheb]

The one thing I didn't get about the hybrid was the power connections. I am not sure why they went with 6pin & 8pin PCIE power. They really should have gone with 2 8pins. Either way with those temps you should easily be able to get more voltage out, although that doesn't guarantee a better OC, although it should.

Nice score, good run,.

Yeah, my one complaint about the hybrid is that the PCB is reference, I would absolutely have dropped a little bit more for a custom PCB and 8+8 power.

Edit: Thanks! This is my first build and first time overclocking anything, so I'm glad I got a little lucky here.

 

[DeathtoGnomes]

Would like to know which systems are watercooled and which are on air. Best Score I could get was 879, might post if I can break 900. Being on air, might have to take the side off for that bit of extra cooling to OC a bit more.

 

[ZenZimZaliben]

Hey MODS is there a way to query the Forum database and export out a csv file. This post hasn't been updated since July 7th. If one of you would export out a csv file for this thread from July 7th to present I will go through it and make it readable so we can get the first page updated. But I do not want to go through 200 pages and hand type everything...because lazy and a simple db export would be much easier.

 

[uplink777]

Hi guys,

So this is me. I didn't OC the RAM at all. My CPU is running on adaptive offset +0.036 vcore, turbo boost is at 0.001 vcore, I have linked all cores. I still need to think through VRM/VRAM cooling though...

 

[Christotheb]

+12mv overvolt, running at 1491Mhz Clock and 8164MHz memory. The memory was happy to run up to 8200MHz, but didn't increase the score on this.

 

[FX-GMC]

Updated. If I missed or screwed up your score send me a PM.

 

[Jborg]

Now using i5 4690k @ 4.2ghz

 

[BiggieShady]

Slight bump to GPU clock via 10% power limit increase, clock went from 1392 MHz to 1380 MHz, temp went to 83 C ... yeah, you've guessed it, my pc is all set up for quiet operation

 

[Aquinus]

I'm finally home so I re-ran Heaven with Ultra since I missed the "High" setting last time. Once again at upper bound of what clocks my GPU will take.

 

[uplink777]

Hi there. I got pissed off like hell, coz my GPU can't go stable 120 MHz, and does artifacts, so I hit her with 110 MHz on GPU, which seems to hold [Witcher 3]. And I tortured her with memory rising, and got to +550 MHz. Didn't try more yet, I probably will. But one thing, one thing went up with the memory, really high. Score in heaven

Just for fun, I managed to run them +600 MHz [8210 MHz effective], but it doesn't add anymore performance. +1 fps, not worth it.

P.S.: Had stable +135 MHz/+600 MHz with 2629 points, but it's not worth it. It doesn't work in Witcher 3, flickers textures, my GPU core is very weak, very, very weak.

 

[Ian Reardon]

This is a GTX 980M overclocked. Looks like it's close to a low end GTX 970. Not bad for a mobile GPU.

 

[Phyfell]

AMD A10-6800K @ 4.5 GHz; R9 390 Core 1101/Memory 1547

 

[MiataManiac]

Update: Changed overclock settings slightly and am now running on Windows 10. In case you need the reference again, I'm running an i5-4690k and two GTX980s.

 

[Toothless]

Stock CPU but GPU is at 1188/1652. Dat mem bump.

 

[Wonder]

i7 950 @ 4.22Ghz | GTX 980ti |1513Mhz Boost | 2000Mhz GDDR

I have a 950 @ 4ghz and got 2560 with a 980 ti 1514/2153. Max temp 44oC
One difference I noticed is I got a higher min fps of 27.

I'm putting the 980 ti hybrid in a 6700k build this week and I'll post results here so you can see the results and see if it's worth an upgrade from the old faithful 950.
I'm not so much looking at total score but I'm mainly interested in raising the min fps as I play online FPS' on a 144hz monitor and fps drops is my pet hate.

Thought you might be interested and good to see someone else still rocking the 950.

Ps, added phone photo so OP wouldn't add to 1st page as my new build will be done in a couple of days.

 

[ZenZimZaliben]

View attachment 67849

I have a 950 @ 4ghz and got 2560 with a 980 ti 1514/2153. Max temp 44oC
One difference I noticed is I got a higher min fps of 27.

The min fps difference is your GDDDR @ 153Mhz faster than mine. I am excited to see what mine will do once EK releases a water block. It is great to see old tech keeping up, and beating in many cases, current systems. Looking forward to seeing 6700k benchmarks being posted as I am ready for an upgrade but as you can see not really a big need.

 

[Wonder]

Ah yea true. Although I have noticed that the score is based on average FPS and if you look at similar scores with newer CPUs they have a lot higher min FPS than us. You also have to consider this is a GPU intensive benchmark and I assume most games put a lot more stress on the CPU than this with AI etc and cause will test the 950 more. I have limited knowledge on all this though as I'm a noob to all this so I'm probably wrong. It depends what type of gaming you do but as I never want to go below 144fps and will play games on the lowest settings/resolutions to achieve that. I'm pretty much disregarding the actual score and focusing on min FPS as the benchmark.

I ran the setting I posted in continuous loop for about an hour and then it crashed heaven so I dropped to 1471/1980 +18mv and it's been running for 3hrs at 44oC. 2499 score but interestingly the min FPS is still 27 which I guess proves the CPU is causing the FPS drops which justifies the Skylake upgrade to me. (Justifies my empty bank account) :'(

 

[ZenZimZaliben]

Ah yea true. Although I have noticed that the score is based on average FPS and if you look at similar scores with newer CPUs they have a lot higher min FPS than us. You also have to consider this is a GPU intensive benchmark and I assume most games put a lot more stress on the CPU(

Yes this benchmark is probably 90% based on GPU...however that is the case with many games. Newer hardware is faster no doubt but in gpu intensive games the old 950 is still competitive. Don't get me wrong I am wanting to upgrade just like you...but it is more of a want than a need.

 

[Wonder]

Yea still some life left in it. I remember the leap going from a stock core 2 duo to an Overclocked 950. It won't be the same leap but I'm looking forword to doing my 1st diy build. Hopefully all parts delivered tomorrow and I'll put a conservative OC on it and post the results.

 

[evieEH]

Has anyone tried the new GTX 980 TI 6GB?
Curious to the results, thinking of buying it in place of my GTX 770 SLI

 

[Aquinus]

I ran the setting I posted in continuous loop for about an hour and then it crashed heaven so I dropped to 1471/1980 +18mv and it's been running for 3hrs at 44oC. 2499 score but interestingly the min FPS is still 27 which I guess proves the CPU is causing the FPS drops which justifies the Skylake upgrade to me. (Justifies my empty bank account) :'(

I think the benchmark dips on every setup when there is a scene change. What's interesting is that my GPU clocks drop when the scene changes and that the "minimum fps" is actually artificial. The benchmark shouldn't be counting frames during scene transitions when the screen is black IMHO.

My minimum was 24.6 FPS despite having a 3820 overclocked to 4.2Ghz. Not to say that the 390 is faster than the 980 Ti (it most definitely is no where close,) but it is interesting how every minimum fps is very similar. I think the score is derived from the number of frames rendered, nothing more so the "minimum" is probably just a useless number with no real meaning.

 

[HammerON]

Has anyone tried the new GTX 980 TI 6GB?
Curious to the results, thinking of buying it in place of my GTX 770 SLI

Check the first page for results. There are quite a few GTX 980 Ti runs.

 

[Lv100Toast]

i7 4790k @ 4.6 | MSI GTX 980 SLI @ 1506/1995
Was able to tweak my memory clock a little higher. Not too bad.

 

[the54thvoid]

i7 3930k @ 4.2 EVGA GTX980ti Kingpin @ 1540/1995

Just a random attempt - really happy at temps. No glitches or anything and voltage was set at 1.2 but the actual was 1.16-1.17v (Kingpin can monitor actual voltage received). If I pushed the temps down lower I think it would hit substantially higher clocks. That's why the ASIC counts.

EDIT: Tried CPU at 4.4Ghz, Kingpin at 1545/8100 (again at 1.16-1.17v) and only got 107.3fps. The card struggles at 1550Mhz - would need super tight voltage and not too much. With this card brute force voltage doesn't work. The extra cpu speed also didn't do much so I'll call it quits until I get a new platform. I think a more modern cpu with a higher ipc may give me an extra few % which would potentially push me to 110fps+ My old Sandy-E is coming up on 4 years so although it's still a storming fast cpu - the IPC does hold it back on Benchmarks.

 

[jose arguelles]

Fx 8320