- Joined
- May 2, 2010
- Messages
- 67 (0.01/day)
System Name | Max LGA775 SLI |
---|---|
Processor | Q9650 @ 4.401Ghz |
Motherboard | Gigabyte EP45-UD3P |
Cooling | NH-D14 |
Memory | G.Skill DDR2 "Pi" 9600 |
Video Card(s) | GTX 285 SLI (756/1692/1350) |
Storage | Crucial C300 128Gb SSD, 4 x 1Tb HD |
Display(s) | Samsung T260, T260HD |
Case | HAF 932 |
Power Supply | Antec TPQ-1200 |
Software | Windows 7 x64 Ultimate |
So, a stock 980ti is 2 fps slower than a Fury X at 4K on an engine from a company that worked with AMD? How is this slow? This is what you'd expect is it not? A £550-£600 gfx card made from Unobtainium is a fraction faster than a £530 (stock version) card*. As for the rest of the stack - go figure, it's DICE. No surprises above. FTR mind you, most 980ti's run way faster than the stock tested benchmarks.
*offers not included.
Why are you surprised....FuryX rocks at resolutions higher then 1080p when the game isn't loaded with Nvidia hairworks junk.