• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Article: Just How Important is GPU Memory Bandwidth?

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,683 (4.09/day)
Location
Houston
System Name Moving into the mobile space
Processor 7940HS
Motherboard HP trash
Cooling HP trash
Memory 2x8GB
Video Card(s) 4070 mobile
Storage 512GB+2TB NVME
Display(s) some 165hz thing that isn't as nice as it sounded
This shouldn't surprise anyone. 128bit GDDR3 had this exact same issues with midrange cards of the past. The midrange has been memory bandwidth limited for a while...
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.86/day)
Talking about bandwidth with low end cards is pointless waste of time. We all know bandwidth matters at high resolutions and high FSAA levels. Meaning none of mid and low end cards can even do it at usable framerates. Only place when discussion about it even makes sense is high and enthusiast level of cards. Those that will actualyl run high res, high settings games at usable framerate. Meaning R9-290X/390X and GTX 980 and above.
 

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,683 (4.09/day)
Location
Houston
System Name Moving into the mobile space
Processor 7940HS
Motherboard HP trash
Cooling HP trash
Memory 2x8GB
Video Card(s) 4070 mobile
Storage 512GB+2TB NVME
Display(s) some 165hz thing that isn't as nice as it sounded
Talking about bandwidth with low end cards is pointless waste of time. We all know bandwidth matters at high resolutions and high FSAA levels. Meaning none of mid and low end cards can even do it at usable framerates. Only place when discussion about it even makes sense is high and enthusiast level of cards. Those that will actualyl run high res, high settings games at usable framerate. Meaning R9-290X/390X and GTX 980 and above.

Even the 280X (7950) can run high res at high settings, especially in crossfire/SLi. Those cards if you will notice still have 384bit memory busses, GPU wise the GTX960 competes with the 7950, yet in high resolution environments the 7950 takes the lead. That is why threads like this exist, it is showing how the memory bandwidth cripples an otherwise good GPU.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
23,031 (6.08/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
System Name Tiny the White Yeti
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling CPU: Thermalright Peerless Assassin / Case: Phanteks T30-120 x3
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
VR HMD HD 420 - Green Edition ;)
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
Talking about bandwidth with low end cards is pointless waste of time. We all know bandwidth matters at high resolutions and high FSAA levels. Meaning none of mid and low end cards can even do it at usable framerates. Only place when discussion about it even makes sense is high and enthusiast level of cards. Those that will actualyl run high res, high settings games at usable framerate. Meaning R9-290X/390X and GTX 980 and above.

Wait, whut?!

Bandwidth matters on every single GPU. Back in the Kepler days there were several versions of the GTX 660 with different memory subsystems. Going lower down the price tiers, you have similar named cards with 64 bit and 128 bit DDR3 and GDDR5 versions. Tell me again bandwidth doesn't matter. Especially on the lower end of the spectrum you can get totally raped if you don't investigate carefully what you buy. In comparison, all high end cards perform far more similarly and are generally very well balanced. The only outlier here is the AMOUNT of memory, where 'bigger is better' is still a very popular marketing strategy.

Talking about lower end hardware may be pointless to you, or us, but especially when you are trying to maximize the benefit of that lower end hardware, memory bandwidth is an essential piece of the puzzle.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.86/day)
Overclock VRAM and you'll get a tiny fps bump. Overclock GPU and the fps with jump like crazy. VRAM only really makes difference in very specific conditions. GPU makes difference in every situation.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,375 (3.52/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
A 280x to a 290? I wouldn't make that small jump, no. 290x, or Fury, or GTX 980/980Ti. Make the jump worth it from a performance standpoint. ;)
 

cdawall

where the hell are my stars
Joined
Jul 23, 2006
Messages
27,683 (4.09/day)
Location
Houston
System Name Moving into the mobile space
Processor 7940HS
Motherboard HP trash
Cooling HP trash
Memory 2x8GB
Video Card(s) 4070 mobile
Storage 512GB+2TB NVME
Display(s) some 165hz thing that isn't as nice as it sounded
You mean 7950 to 7970 doesn't make sense to you :p
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
2,362 (0.50/day)
System Name msdos
Processor 8086
Motherboard mainboard
Cooling passive
Memory 640KB + 384KB extended
Video Card(s) EGA
Storage 5.25"
Display(s) 80x25
Case plastic
Audio Device(s) modchip
Power Supply 45 watts
Mouse serial
Keyboard yes
Software disk commander
Benchmark Scores still running
Overclock VRAM and you'll get a tiny fps bump. Overclock GPU and the fps with jump like crazy. VRAM only really makes difference in very specific conditions. GPU makes difference in every situation.

Doesn't that entirely depend on the bottleneck. For instance, isn't the 960 severely bottlenecked by its 128-bit vram?
 
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
4,666 (0.70/day)
Location
Washington, US
System Name Rainbow
Processor Intel Core i7 8700k
Motherboard MSI MPG Z390M GAMING EDGE AC
Cooling Corsair H115i, 2x Noctua NF-A14 industrialPPC-3000 PWM
Memory G. Skill TridentZ RGB 4x8GB (F4-3600C16Q-32GTZR)
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3090 Trinity
Storage 2x Samsung 950 Pro 256GB | 2xHGST Deskstar 4TB 7.2K
Display(s) Samsung C27HG70
Case Xigmatek Aquila
Power Supply Seasonic 760W SS-760XP
Mouse Razer Deathadder 2013
Keyboard Corsair Vengeance K95
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 4 trillion points in GmailMark, over 144 FPS 2K Facebook Scrolling (Extreme Quality preset)
Overclock VRAM and you'll get a tiny fps bump. Overclock GPU and the fps with jump like crazy. VRAM only really makes difference in very specific conditions. GPU makes difference in every situation.
There are exceptions (typically in the low end). I can (near-)double the FPS I get out of my work PC's GeForce 8400 GS by overclocking VRAM alone. Overclocking GPU actually nets almost nothing at all.

Now, the obvious reply here is "Who cares about FPS on lower end cards" and I would agree. Still, from a purely academic perspective, it is possible.

Edit:
Stock
upload_2015-10-28_12-45-19.png


Mem-only OC
upload_2015-10-28_12-47-26.png


Mem+GPU OC (Edit: Shader clock was lower than mem-only, revised)
upload_2015-10-28_13-12-46.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-10-28_12-49-19.png
    upload_2015-10-28_12-49-19.png
    386.5 KB · Views: 388
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,937 (1.74/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name stress-less
Processor 9800X3D @ 5.42GHZ
Motherboard MSI PRO B650M-A Wifi
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit EVO
Memory 64GB DDR5 6000 1:1 CL30-36-36-96 FCLK 2000
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2TB WD SN850, 4TB WD SN850X
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case Jonsbo Z20
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply RIP Corsair SF750... Waiting for SF1000
Mouse DeathadderV2 X Hyperspeed
Keyboard 65% HE Keyboard
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
Ram and ram bandwidth only matter when theres not enough, and then they matter ALOT. When there is enough, then going higher / more does nothing.
 
Top