• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ten Shin Han said:
guys,

looking at your impressive scores, I was wondering if any of you knows what part of the demo can bring the perf to the lower FPS ? because isn't it strange to see such spread between max and min FPS ?

please advise.
Click to expand...
The dip in one or two of the scenes when stuff is being loaded/cached.
 
So did my Entry not count?
 
I need help. I don't know why I get such a terrible score. The computer is less than a month old, and regardless of the graphics settings on games and videos, I can get as low as 2 FPS.

  • OS: Windows 10 Home
  • Brand: ABS Computer Technologies
  • Model: Vayron GS
  • Processor: Intel Core i7-6700K
  • Processor Main Features: 64 bit Quad-Core Processor
  • Cache Per Processor: 8 MB L3 Cache
  • Memory: 16 GB DDR4
  • Storage: 1 TB HDD + 240 GB SSD
  • Optical Drive: 24X DL DVD+/-RW Drive
  • Graphics: NVIDIA Geforce GTX 970 4 GB
  • Ethernet: Gigabit Ethernet
  • Power Supply: 600W

7df6b2e8d1.jpg
 
Last edited:
CheatingWolf said:
I need help. I don't know why I get such a terrible score. The computer is less than a month old, and regardless of the graphics settings on games and videos, I can get as low as 2 FPS.

  • OS: Windows 10 Home
  • Brand: ABS Computer Technologies
  • Model: Vayron GS
  • Processor: Intel Core i7-6700K
  • Processor Main Features: 64 bit Quad-Core Processor
  • Cache Per Processor: 8 MB L3 Cache
  • Memory: 16 GB DDR4
  • Storage: 1 TB HDD + 240 GB SSD
  • Optical Drive: 24X DL DVD+/-RW Drive
  • Graphics: NVIDIA Geforce GTX 970 4 GB
  • Ethernet: Gigabit Ethernet
  • Power Supply: 600W
Click to expand...

My 2 cents: did you check that the PCI slot you are using if a full 16x (16x) for maximum bandwith and not 4x ?
 
Ten Shin Han said:
My 2 cents: did you check that the PCI slot you are using if a full 16x (16x) for maximum bandwith and not 4x ?
Click to expand...

It came pre-assembled due to my lack of time to build my own, and sadly, I feel completely ignorant when I ask, how do I check that?
 
CheatingWolf said:
.... how do I check that?
Click to expand...

Find the documentation of your motherboard, it should contains a drawing of your mobo layout, and a description of each pci slot, then you can figure out by yourself if your graphic card is in the appropriate slot.

or maybe this is overkill, maybe we should assume the factory correctly assembled your system, and this is a software issue.

it is your call.

Good luck :-)
 
Ten Shin Han said:
Find the documentation of your motherboard, it should contains a drawing of your mobo layout, and a description of each pci slot, then you can figure out by yourself if your graphic card is in the appropriate slot.

or maybe this is overkill, maybe we should assume the factory correctly assembled your system, and this is a software issue.

it is your call.

Good luck :)
Click to expand...

Thank you. I just checked, but unfortunately, it was in the 16x slot. Not sure what I should do now.
 
Before you start the benchmark within the application, let it run for a minute or so to kind of let it spool up. I usually let it run for a while before I run the benchmark.
 
HammerON said:
Before you start the benchmark within the application, let it run for a minute or so to kind of let it spool up.
Click to expand...

I can get moderately decent FPS on the benchmark when my graphics card hasn't been used/pushed, but what happens is after 5 minutes of playing a game such as CS:GO or FFXIV, the FPS average rate drops to a range of 2-10 FPS. With my hardware, this should not be happening.
 
2h31ZHe.jpg


Intel i7 2600K @ 4.8ghz
Gigabyte GTX 980 Ti G1 Gaming @ 1477mhz / 7910mhz

I have had a more aggressive OC that yielded a 2534 score but I like to back off a good OC just a little.
2h31ZHe[IMG]
 
Last edited:
First time benchmarking, just got my new 980Ti today, not sure how this stacks up... i5 4690 @ 3.50GHz / 16GB DDR3 / GPU 1241/1342MHz - Clock 7202MHz

00000.jpg
 
Hi everyone. New member here. Just recently bought an R9 380 (Gigabyte G1) and a new monitor (HP 25xw). Just ran Heaven bench. Is my score a little low or is it in the right ballpark? I didn't see any R9 380's listed in the pg 1 chart, so?

i5-2500k OC'd to 4.5 (using offset mode)
R9 380 4gb - stock - 990MHz, memory 1425MHz

HvoZD0j.jpg


Any ideas why the temp reading in the upper right corner is not correct? If it matters, I had Gigabyte's OC Guru program running and logging to a file during the benchmark. How much, if any, impact would that have made?
 
Hi All,

First post here after getting a Gigabyte GTX 780 TI OC (found the best stable drivers to overclock were 347.52).

I am running it with an i2500k @ 4.5ghz on a Z68X-UD3-B3 gigabyte board, overclocked speeds of card are : 1310/1900 with the following score:

FPS:73.2
Score:1845
Min FPS:30.1
Max FPS:151.9

Needless to say for not upgrading my CPU and only my GPU over the last 4 years I am still pleased with the results.

 
Last edited:
screenshot from inside the benchmark are mandatory please, F12 then drive:user/document/heaven/screenshot(or something like that, it's been a while since i ran a Heaven on my rig) convert the TGA to a JPG and post it.
otherwise not validated, sorry.
 
Here's my 980Ti with i5-4670k.

GPU at: 1338/1835
CPU at: stock 3.4 w/3.8 turbo

Pic of Heaven 4.0:
heaven.png


No pic of CPUZ, but CoreTemp is in the screen shot showing CPU running at 3.8 turbo boost with MSI and GPUZ:
msi-with-gpuz-and-ct.png
 
neatfeatguy said:
Here's my 980Ti with i5-4670k.

GPU at: 1338/1835
CPU at: stock 3.4 w/3.8 turbo
Click to expand...

Your screen shot and mentioned post show different clocks. :confused:
 
Your screen shot and mentioned post show different clocks. :confused:
Click to expand...
If you are talking about the MSI afterburner and GPU-z screenshot the clocks seems like they match.
If you look at the white arrow which is the base clock it's under the 1400 mark which is 1338 according to GPU-z.
If you look at the blue arrow which is the boost clock it's a little bit over the 1400 mark which is 1439 according to GPU-z.

The GPU clock of 1514 Mhz I dont know how that number got there, but the 3671 for the memory clock seems to be right 3671/2=1835.5 Mhz which it is in Gpu-z
 
"The GPU clock of 1514 Mhz I dont know how that number got there"

that is what the card is actually boosting to at that moment in time.. the gpu-z boost speed seems to be some kind of estimate.. the boost figure is related to the clock speed but will go up and down relative to temps power usage and whatever..

basically the actual boost speed (the speed the card is actually running at) will drop from a theoretical maximum related to the clock speed set when the card hits any of its control limits.. in short it throttles down..

if you run furmark you will see much lower boost speeds.. furmark will always hit the control limits.. heaven or valley not so much so..

a boost of 1514 is quite good.. my TI would not be fully stable that high.. it would ether trip over its own feet or throttle down.. :)

trog
 
Last edited:
trog100 said:
"The GPU clock of 1514 Mhz I dont know how that number got there"

that is what the card is actually boosting to at that moment in time.. the gpu-z boost speed seems to be some kind of estimate.. the boost figure is related to the clock speed but will go up and down relative to temps power usage and whatever..

basically the actual boost speed (the speed the card is actually running at) will drop from a theoretical maximum related to the clock speed set when the card hits any of its control limits.. in short it throttles down..

if you run furmark you will see much lower boost speeds.. furmark will always hit the control limits.. heaven or valley not so much so..

a boost of 1514 is quite good.. my TI would not be fully stable that high.. it would ether trip over its own feet or throttle down.. :)

trog
Click to expand...

That's what I kind of thought when it came to the boost speed MSI shows compared to GPUZ. But I'm not sure how common that boost is in games. My Ti stays cool - doesn't break 68C when gaming or running Firestrike or Heaven benchmarks....I'll have to watch MSI while playing other games.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top