Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores

[scevism]

 

[Vellinious]

Texture filtering: Change from quality to performance. Those settings look good. Now, download and open up GPUz to the sensors tab and run the benchmark again. Take a screenshot of it right after you're done. That'll tell us what your GPU is doing.

PM the screenshot to me, we're way off topic on the heaven benchmark thread.

 

[chuck216]

Update... found out I was using a generic windows driver for my monitor, got the correct one and this was the result: Everything at Stock 3.5 Ghz on CPU 1050/1500 core/mem on GPU:

And @4.7 ghz GPU @1200 Core / 1600 (6400) Mem

 

[Lazermonkey]

I just got my new system up and running. I think I can do better.

 

[Lazermonkey]

Here it is at 2560x1440

 

[Pinkerton B.]

 

[scevism]

Mine at 1360x751 tried to run it at 1920x1080 this is what i get back?

 

[Pinkerton B.]

Here it is at 2560x1440

Nice! That thing is an absolute monster...

 

[jboydgolfer]

 

[chuck216]

@Lazermonkey both of your scores are invalid... read the rules in post 1.

@Pinkerton B. you need the screenshot from within Heaven by hitting F12 then converting to an image wi

Nice! That thing is an absolute monster...

Not really, he has Tessellation disabled and that's the whole point of running Heaven.

 

[Lazermonkey]

View attachment 73337 View attachment 73337

Here is with Tessellation at extreme. Clock setting on the GPU is 1190 boosting up to around 1420.

 

[Lazermonkey]

And here it is at 2560x1440p

 

[jboydgolfer]

Here is with Tessellation at extreme. Clock setting on the GPU is 1190 boosting up to around 1420.

View attachment 73333

And here it is at 2560x1440p

View attachment 73334

you REALLY need to follow the guidlines in the OP, i didnt make the rules up, but people will keep claiming your scores arent "valid", and by default, they will not be recorded into this thread. Ill quote the OP to save you from looking back, and for others....

PAY close attention to the "HERES WHY" link in the quote that you have to expand below, it shows that the website result you keep posting can just be edited to show whatever you want it to, and therefore is an invalid score. just trying to help you, so your scores count is all. do what you will
See my post a few above this one, and you'll see what i mean.
You'll get a file saved in a "heaven folder" in your documents, it will be a weird format, but You can go to THIS site and upload/convert it for free, THEN post that image here after saving it to IMGUR or the likes, since the convert site links dissapear.

***PRESS F12 for SCREENSHOT - Please attach a screen capture of your results for score verification.***
***Your submission will not be added if you fail to follow the rules stated below.***

Benchmark setup:

1.) 1920x1080, Fullscreen, 8x Anti-Aliasing
2.) Ultra Quality
3.) Extreme Tessellation
4.) No integrated GPU enabled, unless it's the only GPU in the build
5.) Tessellation correctly set up on AMD cards and not bypassed in CCC
6.) You must also provide correct GPU and CPU clocks
7.) Must Be a Screenshot from within Heaven to be valid (See bottom of post) Here's why.
8.) The only allowed "tweak" is overclocking. Absolutely no driver tweaks or operating system tweaks are permitted.

It will ensure that we have consistent results.

 

[Pinkerton B.]

GeForce GTX 880m SLI - Alienware 18 - 2014 - Offsets +46 for GPU and +623 for mem

 

[jaggerwild]

hey guys I cant get a screen shoot within heaven? HOW........

 

[Gregory Hartley]

GTX Gigabyte 970 G1 Edition 1499/1928
i7 4790k 4.6 GHz

 

[Kapportal]

Hello guys, how is this? Air 970 msi gaming 1533 core, 8600 memory (i don't know, they are even Elpida and not samsung....) 350 W TDP power target 110% 375W, using max 66% of those watts (66% of 350 i think, since 375 would be 110%)
Screenshots, if i miss something to screenshot i have barely few problems to re-run the bench at those settings, i encounter easy crash at the next clock not before (1550).
cpu:
https://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/417x417q90/922/QBD6mz.png
gpu:
https://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/381x486q90/922/x7MQ2A.png
(the oc applied is the daily i use for gaming, i move with ab if i need to bench)
ab,gpuz graphs post, bench:
https://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1375x771q90/922/uLypUD.png
bench result:
https://imageshack.com/a/img923/7751/tUiRkZ.png
let me know if i do miss something please have a nice day everybody

 

[jboydgolfer]

let me know if i do miss something please have a nice day everybody

Post your scores pics with the botton in the image i posted below...and refer to THIS post for the guidlines for scores to be accepted...
finally, dont be jealous of my Prof grade Photo editing Skillz...

 

[Kapportal]

cpu:

gpu:

(the oc applied is the daily i use for gaming, i move with ab if i need to bench)
ab,gpuz graphs post, bench:

bench result:

let me know if i do miss something please have a nice day everybody*edit*



thank you for your advices about posting, just the gpuz schedule clocks are the daily gaming and not the bench oc ones, i think may be alright since the screenshots with gpuz graphs and ab graphs are telling which clocks i ran the benchmark with and with which stability on. If needed i can just move ab clocks and re-screenshot gpuz, i don't think would be useful, but anyways let me know.

 

[bjamesonbass]

Question: does the AMD Radeon R9 295x2 count as "multi GPU" for this test since it is technically a "two in one" GPU?

The link for the GPU is here:

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7930/the-amd-radeon-r9-295x2-review

 

[jboydgolfer]

2 or 1 GPU's?

its 2 GPU's. even tho there is only One printed Circuit board, there Are Two Chips. it is very similar to Xfire, or SLI, its just that all of the communication is done VIA the PCB/PCIe Lane instead of a Xfire/SLI Bridge.

When You do the Test, it must give You a "X2" result readout,or doesnt it?

like the "X2" @ the end of my PC readout...

And then a better score, same clocks i dunno

 

[bjamesonbass]

= Two GPUs

Okay, I thought so, though I just wanted to be sure since it's a unique configuration. It does display the "x2" after the GPU in the benchmark.

That is very weird that you got that much of a difference between your benchmarks with the same clock speeds. Maybe you had some background processes going on more in the first test for whatever reason.

I'll post my score in a bit...

 

[Shou Miko]

Just ran it on my system not that impressive of a score tbh....

 

[jboydgolfer]

1470 isnt that bad, my HIGHEST with a single 970 was 1598(overclocked highly) or very close. and mine are reference Nvidia GTX 970's. But I had my Bios' edited By a TPU member to stop thermal/Voltage throttling.

go to Post #1, and check the results of Other 970's and You can get a good feel for how your did.

 

[bjamesonbass]

I just put in AMD's best processor (still incomparable to intel's best CPU, but whatever lol) and 32 GB of decent DDR3 RAM (DDR4 is still too expensive, in my opinion).

I got the r9 295x2 new for ~ $700 in July, and the new processor was ~ $250. The motherboard was ~ $200. RAM was ~ 130.

All in all, I put together a pretty good rig without paying an insane amount of money. I haven't really posted anywhere before or talked to anybody about this stuff, so it would be totally cool if anyone could give me an opinion about whether it was worth all the money and hassle of putting it together myself.