Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores Part 2

[MrGenius]

Ok...I'm willing to reconsider. I will change the rule to "Screenshots showing the number of GPUs as x2/x3/x4 are considered Multi GPU (Unless clearly stated that they aren't)". My stipulations being IF you can show me that simply disconnecting the power cable(s) from one of the cards doesn't fix it from showing x2 in the screenshot. However IF that does work...then to ask that you do so is not an unreasonable request. That's what I meant by unplug one. That renders the card inoperative and undetectable in my single card setup. I figured it should do the same in yours. I would try proving it myself. But I don't have a multi GPU setup.

Fair enough?

BTW, if any other members would be willing to confirm or deny that as being a working solution I would greatly appreciate your input on it too. I just want to be sure it applies to everyone. Since I don't want to have to keep changing or making up rules as we go along.

 

[jboydgolfer]

im too dumb to cause a Fuss

 

[Vellinious]

If you unplug them they don't show up. I never bothered, because nobody else requires it. Same thing with Firestrike, btw. It'll show X2 up above, but only lists one GPU down below.

 

[MrGenius]

Ok then that answers that. I'm sorry to be a dick about then. But if it were entirely up to me I would be enforcing all of the rules more strictly than was previously the case. What I mean by that is there are A LOT of scores that technically need to be declared invalid. Anything with "????" or "~####" is BS. The rules clearly state, and always have, that CORRECT CPU and GPU scores MUST be provided. But since that was allowed to happen previously when the thread wasn't under my control, I'm not going to invalidate those scores. Such rule breakers are not making the list from this point forward though.

 

[jboydgolfer]

Ok then that answers that. I'm sorry to be a dick about then. But if it were entirely up to me I would be enforcing all of the rules more strictly than was previously the case. What I mean by that is there are A LOT of scores that technically need to be declared invalid. Anything with "????" or "~####" is BS. The rules clearly state, and always have, that CPU and GPU scores MUST be provided. But since that was allowed to happen previously when the thread wasn't under my control, I'm not going to invalidate those scores. Such rule breakers are not making the list from this point forward though.

theres (or was)some pretty shady scores up there from way back. Ive seen some that are just obvious fakes.. iirc there was a 6870 that had scored a bit higher than my 970 can yeah right.

Also, Sweet scores @Vellinious

 

[Vellinious]

Thanks...took a month and a couple hundred bios versions to get that card just right.

 

[MrGenius]

theres (or was)some pretty shady scores up there from way back. Ive seen some that are just obvious fakes.. iirc there was a 6870 that had scored a bit higher than my 970 can yeah right.

Speaking of which, I threw a hissy fit in the previous thread about one of Schmuckley's OBVIOUSLY fake scores. It was crossed out by FX-GMC. Which I assumed was to give said poster on opportunity to verify it. Yeah right. I called his ass out with the "@" too. So I know he knows about it. He never showed his face to explain himself. But I'll tell you what, even if he does, I'm not changing it. And if he tries pulling that shit again, I'll ban him from both threads(this one and the new Valley one too) and delete all of his scores. Take that MFer!

And PLEASE let me know if that type of thing happens here. Like I said, I'm bound to make mistakes.

 

[jboydgolfer]

Speaking of which

Wow, i didnt know he had done that. i have NO clue who's result it was, i just remember seeing some VERY fishy results in the past. but i appreciate the fact that your vigilant.

 

[Vellinious]

I'd run them again just to prove a point, but I sold those cards....I was bored with them, and wanted to play with something different. Thus, the 290X score. Bored with it now, gonna be getting a 980ti to play with while I wait for the custom pcb pascal cards.

 

[MrGenius]

FWIW nobody is denying your accomplishment. I believe you. And I'm pretty sure everybody else does too. You can brag about it and be proud of yourself. You done good. Unfortunately I just can't list it. But in the broader scheme of things...who cares? I mean obviously you do. But it's just a stupid list and a technicality. It doesn't really take away from your skills and talents as an overclocker. I know these things can be incredibly difficult achievements. I've been around the block a while now..

 

[TheHunter]

Ok this is my "max" manual stable OC so far.. Maybe I could go to 1500MHz if I unlocked 1.230v limit.. 1.230v limits me to boost 1478MHz (base 1314MHz)


4770K @ 4.7GHz + GTX 980TI @ 1478/1880 = 2601

 

[MrGenius]

I'd run them again just to prove a point, but I sold those cards...

I'll tell you what I'm going to do about that. But first let me clarify the reasons why.

1. Because it's not fair in any sense of the word to spring a rule on you that you weren't aware of.

2. I let a lot of other scores in here that were carry overs from the previous thread that were only held accountable to the rules and standards, or lack thereof, put in place by the previous OP. And since yours was such a score, the rules of this one do not necessarily apply to it. Newly added rules or otherwise.

3. Mostly, because I can't live with myself feeling like I robbed you out of the top score for that particular card. I just can't do it. It's not fair to you. It's also not fair to me. I can't justify my actions in this case. I still feel like the bad guy no matter how many times I rethink it. And there's only one way out of this for me. Honestly, if it hadn't been at least a top 3 score for the GTX 970 I would feel much better about telling you tough luck. A top 3 score is a major accomplishment.

4. This is my thread. And I'll do with it as I see fit. That doesn't mean I'll do whatever I like mind you. It means that I will try and keep it fitting within the spirit of the contest as a whole, to the best of my ability. From beginning to...let's just say now. Since this is actually a continuation of the previous thread. I'm not about to make it up entirely as I go along. I would like it to stay as close to the same as it was. The only things I really want to change are the things that weren't clearly stated or spelled out before. Or that seem unfair to me.

5. The attempt to disqualify your score was a knee jerk/gut reaction. I'm still not 100% sure why I've decided to change the rules slightly to prevent it from happening. My gut tells me I should. For some reason I can see it potentially causing problems. And I feel I must take preventative measures to avoid that. I'm not sure why or how it's going to make a difference. But something tells me I'm making the right decision here. So I am going to stand by it. The rule is here to stay.

However, you are going to be THE exception to that rule. For the reasons stated above. So...I'm adding that score to the list. You earned it. That much is clear to me now. Just to reiterate, this is mainly to clean my own conscience of the guilt I feel about treating someone even slightly unfairly. I'm not about that. Not even a little bit. That type of thing eats away at me. I'm doing this above all else to preserve my own sanity. I need to be able to sleep at night and all that rot.

Phew! Now that's over and done with. Well...It'll take me a minute to update the list with that score.

Moving on...

 

[jaggerwild]

jaggerwild
3930K@5.0Mhz
780Ti DCIIOC/SLI@1159/1889

Think this is correct? Had over 4K score but no AA

OK now for valley

 

[MrGenius]

Think this is correct?

It's close enough. I'd rather see the entire full screenshot from Heaven(top to bottom, edge to edge). But I can see enough of it in this instance to believe it's not fabricated. I think I am going to be a stickler about that in this thread. I'm going to let this one pass mainly because I can see part of the info in the upper right corner. Enough of it to tell me you were using 2 Nvidia cards. Which leads me to believe they are the same 2 shown in the score panel.

EDIT: Quick question. Where are we at on the CPU clock on that one? 5.0MHz can't possibly be right. And Your CPU-Z looks like it says 1.3GHz.

As a prime example of what's acceptable, your previous screenshot was perfection as far as I care.

What I won't accept would be something like this.

And most certainly not this.

 

[TheHunter]

So my results are ok, do I need to post cpu-z screen shoot too?



btw is there also a techpowerup Unigine Valley benchmark?

 

[MrGenius]

...do I need to post cpu-z screen shoot too?

btw is there also a techpowerup Unigine Valley benchmark?

No CPU-Z required. You can if you wish.

There's a NEW and old Valley scores thread. I suggest posting your scores in the new one. If you want them added to the list. The old thread is dead too. If what you mean by that is is there a TPU version of the Unigine Valley Benchmark? No, not that I'm aware of. But you can find it in the downloads section.

The link to the NEW Valley scores thread is in my sig. But here it is again anyway. NEW Unigine Valley Benchmark 1.0 Scores

 

[jaggerwild]

It's close enough. I'd rather see the entire full screenshot from Heaven(top to bottom, edge to edge). But I can see enough of it in this instance to believe it's not fabricated. I think I am going to be a stickler about that in this thread. I'm going to let this one pass mainly because I can see part of the info in the upper right corner. Enough of it to tell me you were using 2 Nvidia cards. Which leads me to believe they are the same 2 shown in the score panel.

EDIT: Quick question. Where are we at on the CPU clock on that one? 5.0MHz can't possibly be right. And Your CPU-Z looks like it says 1.3GHz.

As a prime example of what's acceptable, your previous screenshot was perfection as far as I care.

What I won't accept would be something like this.
View attachment 74185

And most certainly not this.
View attachment 74186

5Mhz
Its throttling all energy savers on...............................

 

[MrGenius]

5Mhz
Its throttling all energy savers on...............................

Wow. That's amazingly low. 5MHz it is then.

 

[jaggerwild]

Asus X79 Deluxe has built in haswell feature's(so I read) as it came just before the X99 came out. I love it!! Oh next one will have the tabs in it too, understand full screen shot!

 

[kkarab]

Hello everyone, this is my score with cpu at default speed and gpu@1420MHz...

 

[MrGenius]

Hello everyone, this is my score with cpu at default speed and gpu@1420MHz...

The screenshot is good. But can you please provide the correct GPU mem speed(speed shown /2). I want to be sure I list it correctly. I assume you are using the same Xeon E5-2667 V3 as you posted in the Valley thread. Also if the CPU clock speed is lower than max turbo @ 3.6GHz please provide that too. Or I will list it as 3.6GHz. If these are both incorrect assumptions, then please provide the correct CPU and CPU clock speed.

Thanks.

 

[TheHunter]

No CPU-Z required. You can if you wish.

There's a NEW and old Valley scores thread. I suggest posting your scores in the new one. If you want them added to the list. The old thread is dead too. If what you mean by that is is there a TPU version of the Unigine Valley Benchmark? No, not that I'm aware of. But you can find it in the downloads section.

The link to the NEW Valley scores thread is in my sig. But here it is again anyway. NEW Unigine Valley Benchmark 1.0 Scores

Ok, yeah I meant normal forum group like this one.. Thanks for link!

 

[kkarab]

The screenshot is good. But can you please provide the correct GPU mem speed(speed shown /2). I want to be sure I list it correctly. I assume you are using the same Xeon E5-2667 V3 as you posted in the Valley thread. Also if the CPU clock speed is lower than max turbo @ 3.6GHz please provide that too. Or I will list it as 3.6GHz. If these are both incorrect assumptions, then please provide the correct CPU and CPU clock speed.

Thanks.

So sorry, you are absolutely right.

New run with system specs > Intel Xeon E5-2667v3@3.0GHz + GTX 980Ti (gpu@1430/ram@1752) + DDR4 2133@11-11-11-31-2T = 2414

 

[MrGenius]

I'm experimenting with the spoiler idea for post #1. I like it myself. But any comments or feedback on it are welcome and appreciated.

Thanks!

 

[Pinkerton B.]

Even though the category doesn't exist, this score is dedicated to the phantom laptop grouping.

The fixn's = Alienaware 18 - i74810MQ; 880 SLI