• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

G.SKILL Announces Trident Z DDR4-4266MHz 16GB (2x 8GB) Kit

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,241 (7.55/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
G.SKILL International Enterprise Co., Ltd., the world's leading manufacturer of extreme performance memory and gaming peripherals, is thrilled to announce a new series of high performance DDR4 kits based on 8GB & 16GB modules, from ultra low CAS Latency DDR4 3200MHz CL13 and DDR4 3466MHz CL14 to an extreme speed of DDR4 4266MHz CL19. All these new extreme performance memory are built with ultra high performance Samsung DDR4 8Gb ICs and will join G.SKILL flagship Trident Z series family.

G.SKILL is excited to continuously push the performance of DDR4 technology to the boundaries. These newly released memory kits provide PC enthusiasts, extreme gamers, and overclockers ultimate memory speed, as well as ultra high density for professional applications.



These new ultimate Trident Z memory will be available via G.SKILL authorized distribution partners in June 2016. For detail specifications, please refer to the following chart:



XMP 2.0 Support for 6th Gen Intel Core Processors & Z170 Platforms
These new high performance Trident Z kits are designed for the latest 6th Gen Intel Core processors and Z170 chipset platforms with the latest XMP 2.0 profile. The stress-testing screenshots of the memory kits can be found below. The 4266MHz kit was validated with the ASUS ROG MAXIMUS VIII IMPACT motherboard, while the 3200 CL13 and 3466 CL14 kits were validated with the ASUS Z170-DELUXE motherboard.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
5,717 (0.94/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) 32'' 4K Dell
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
VR HMD HTC Vive + Oculus Quest 2
Software Windows 10 P
64GB with that low timing??? That IMC must be crying.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.87/day)
CL19. What's the point of high clock when timings are so high? This is only for certain rare applications where you need the raw bandwidth, but not the latencies...
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
5,047 (0.94/day)
Location
Iberian Peninsula
I wonder if we will ever get improved RAM for X99... Running 3rd kit and I still cannot do what I want to do with it (run it at max XMP profile without drawbacks).
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
6,725 (1.39/day)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
CL19. What's the point of high clock when timings are so high? This is only for certain rare applications where you need the raw bandwidth, but not the latencies...
Read this and maybe you will understand what and why ;)

http://www.crucial.com/usa/en/memory-performance-speed-latency

true latency (ns) = clock cycle time (ns) x number of clock cycles (CL)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAS_latency

CAS latency is irrelevant. Cycle time and Bit time are the relevant ones ;)

Therefore, the Cycle time for the 4266 module with CL19 is 0,468ns better than 0,626ns of the 3200 module ;)
 
Last edited:
Top