NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Clock Speeds Revealed

[btarunr]

NVIDIA posted the product page of its upcoming GeForce GTX 1070 graphics card, confirming its clock-speeds, and related specifications. The card features a nominal GPU clock speed of 1506 MHz, with a maximum GPU Boost frequency of 1683 MHz. The memory is clocked at 2000 MHz (actual), or 8 GHz (GDDR5-effective), working out to a memory bandwidth of 256 GB/s. The company also rates the card's single-precision floating point performance at 6.45 TFLOP/s. Other key specs include 1,920 CUDA cores, 120 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The GeForce GTX 1070 goes on sale, on the 10th of June, 2016.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site

 

[RejZoR]

2 GHz GPU or bust I hate my GTX 980 so much because I couldn't squeeze out another 60 MHz to reach a round 1500 MHz

 

[EarthDog]

So...... those mismatched memory people from the speculation thread... what say you?

 

[TheGuruStud]

2 GHz GPU or bust I hate my GTX 980 so much because I couldn't squeeze out another 60 MHz to reach a round 1500 MHz

60% ASIC quality...gotta love TSMC and their BS hype.

 

[ensabrenoir]

This made me laugh....

madafaka42047 :
i felt a great disturbance in the force... as if millions amd fanboys cried out in terror.. and were suddenly silenced.

 

[R00kie]

Wouldn't it be just easier to show that they disabled the whole GPC rather than putting red boxes in random places?

 

[john_]

2 GHz GPU or bust I hate my GTX 980 so much because I couldn't squeeze out another 60 MHz to reach a round 1500 MHz

You could downclock 40MHz and have a nice round 1400 MHz

 

[matar]

June 10 my case is waiting GTX 1070

 

[P4-630]

June 10 my case is waiting GTX 1070

Mine as well...Asus GTX1070 Strix. Running on intel HD530 at the moment

 

[MrGenius]

MSI GTX 1070 Gaming 8GB for me.

 

[Eroticus]

so 200$ less for different BIOS and GDDR5 ?

 

[Vayra86]

You could downclock 40MHz and have a nice round 1400 MHz

I haven't overclocked Maxwell, but isn't the clock binning in steps of 13 mhz? Kepler is like that at least, and it is related to boost clock which is ported to Maxwell.

 

[the54thvoid]

You could downclock 40MHz and have a nice round 1400 MHz

 

[hojnikb]

Wouldn't it be just easier to show that they disabled the whole GPC rather than putting red boxes in random places?

This would cut ROPs and memory controllers by 1/4 aswell.

 

[dj-electric]

so 200$ less for different BIOS and GDDR5 ?

They cores are cut physically. This is as "different BIOS" as GTX 970 to a GTX 980 or an R9 390X to a R9 380

 

[medi01]

So, there goes "faster than Titan", or not yet?

so 200$ less

Fake MSRPs:
$599 - $379 = 220$

Real MSRPs:
$699 - $449 = 150$

In other words: math is strong, within you... =)))))

 

[dozenfury]

Well this is better than some had speculated. The 1070 should handle anything maxxed 1920x1080 and 60fps with no problems, and then maybe I'll plunge for a 1080ti and nice 4k monitor in a year or so. The 1080 is tempting but the early reviews look like it's still a bit short of maxxed 4k 60fps gaming despite the marketing claims, and I'm not going to sli 2 $600 cards to get there.

AMD is going to really have to pull a shocker to even be competitive in the gaming segment before Vega is available. I don't see the Polaris 10 coming close to even the 1070.

 

[ppn]

Nvidia asks 2/3 the price for 3/4 the performance of 1080.

 

[EarthDog]

So, there goes "faster than Titan", or not yet?



Fake MSRPs:
$599 - $379 = 120$

Real MSRPs:
$699 - $449 = 150$

In other words: math is strong, within you... =)))))

It probably is faster than the Titan. I think NVIDIA was talking about the Titan X.... and I bet its still close.

 

[alwayssts]

AMD is going to really have to pull a shocker to even be competitive in the gaming segment before Vega is available. I don't see the Polaris 10 coming close to even the 1070.

This is where we agree and disagree.

I agree they will have to pull a shocker. The difference is, I think it will be that shocker.

Just because P10 is focused toward mainstream for efficiency/price/power, doesn't mean there will not be a higher-clocked/gddr5x close-to-~225w-capable variant. If that WERE the case (they abandoned that market until Vega), AMD would be an incredibly idiotic company. I think people give them too little credit, especially when they've said over and over chip is made to scale across a ton of different markets.

I still have absolutely no idea if a GDDR5x model will happen right away with P10, or if they will focus on mobile/<150w/perhaps slightly greater than 150w but still GDDR5 (for overclocking potential) for initial launch....or what. But it WILL eventually happen, and logic simply dictates with their supposed price and flop/gbps bw perf (extrapolated from the clocks of PS4 neo) that with GDDR5x it should (when clocked high-enough, which there is no reason shouldn't be able to happen) compete with 1070.

Even if you figure 2048sp instead of 2560 (which I don't necessarily believe, 2560 makes a ton more sense), the perf/$ ratio could/should still be similar, if not better, for P10 vs 1070.

 

[EarthDog]

225W would be a kick in the pants considering the 1080's 180W... and I would imagine the 1070 to be 165W or less...

 

[MrGenius]

Even if you figure 2048sp instead of 2560 (which I don't necessarily believe, 2560 makes a ton more sense), the perf/$ ratio could/should still be similar, if not better, for P10 vs 1070.

And when that happens I will shit a golden brick. Which I will promptly exchange for US dollars. And buy at least 3 480Xs with them.

 

[Estaric]

Mine as well...Asus GTX1070 Strix. Running on intel HD530 at the moment

I want dat gigabyte g1 gaming or xtreme gaming... oh wait my name kinda already said that oh well.

 

[Legacy-ZA]

I foresee a GTX 1070Ti in the works.

 

[efikkan]

so 200$ less for different BIOS and GDDR5 ?

No, like almost all silicon chips GP104 are sorted into different binnings, based on defective areas and thermal characteristics. Probably less than 5% of the chips are good enough for GTX 1080, and the others will be partly disabled and binned into lower products. This is a nesessity for manufacturers to get good yields and be able to provide great products at a relatively low cost.

They cores are cut physically. This is as "different BIOS" as GTX 970 to a GTX 980 or an R9 390X to a R9 380

No, they are never cut physically. They may either be disabled in BIOS or permanently disabled by cutting a bridge, but the parts of the chip is never physically removed. If you looked at a wide selection of GP104-200 chips, you'll see different SPs disabled in each chip.

The same also applies to CPUs. My good old i7-3930K is really an 8-core with two cores disabled.