Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores Part 2

[PawnOfGod]

Haha Okay. Honestly 29 and never knew that and feel silly. Also, if i posted them incorrectly Im sorry ill benchmark and screen shot the 2nd screen with snips and add when Im done gaming tonight. As for Vader it says windows 7 on his Heaven Screen shot.

 

[MrGenius]

Also, if i posted them incorrectly Im sorry ill benchmark and screen shot the 2nd screen with snips and add when Im done gaming tonight. As for Vader it says windows 7 on his Heaven Screen shot.

You'll get it eventually. I guess it just takes a while for some.

I have no idea what Heaven screenshot you're referring to(nor do I particularly care). But the one you showed me says "Platform: Windows NT 6.2 (build 9200) 64bit". Just like yours. Just like mine. Just like everybody's who's running Windows 10 64. Not that it matters. Because OS is not being recorded for this thread.

Wait...let me guess. That was your score for 1680x1050? In which case I need correct clocks to list it. If so.

 

[PawnOfGod]

http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/t...-benchmark-scores.198888/page-22#post-3222812


It was a little while back and its the exact same specs and overclock as my 1900x1080

 

[Kapportal]

Hello guys, here my description and score. So sad my card(970 msi gaming) is not pulling out anymore 1531 core 8600 memory so i cant add my 1704 benchmark score since it's not taken on the rocks and i cannot repeat the benchmark for unknown reasons .....


i5-4670K @ 4.0GHz + GTX 970 msi gaming @ 1531.5/8500 = 1659
screenshot (this should be valid instead i think)
i don't remember if the SS should be JPG or PNG, i don't find the info in the thread(s)..
http://s32.postimg.org/qnenjb8xx/heaven_2016_05_18_07_45_31_12.png
hope i can join with this one as well



(just to show you, this was the bench i was talking about)
https://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/1375x773q90/921/XuZbJz.png









Sorry guys, you may ignore the entire thread, i just looked now that the old score i was talking about have been added. Maybe the post reviewer did wait to add a lot of scores since they made the new benchmark page. I apologize, ignore full things i wrote before and no-need to add any score since the one i wanted to add was made just for the rock heaven stuff, and lower to the one i just found out have been added, have a great day.

 

[MrGenius]

http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/t...-benchmark-scores.198888/page-22#post-3222812

It was a little while back and its the exact same specs and overclock as my 1900x1080

I see. And got it. Listed as such.

ALSO SIDE NOTE. @vader007 Got a 1600+ score at 1900x1080 with my same same setup No overclock. My guess to why is becasue he is using Windows 7. the post was a Year ago but hey its in my category of 6300s so it peaked my interest.

Any thoughts?

1. It's listed as 1495/1852 vs. yours(1455/1795)
2. He might have used performance or high performance texture filtering(which are NOT allowed).
3. It's 1920x1080.
_______________________________________

I decided to give 1680x1050 a shot too. Because I was bored.

i5-3570K @ 5.0GHz + R9 280X @ 1222/1850 = 1222

 

[R3ign]

Here's my attempt

Clocks during test

CPU - i5 3570k - 3.8 Ghz (Boost)
GPU - GTX 970 - 1290 Mhz (Boost) GPU-Z screenshot was taken during test but I'd say it's more like 1290 Mhz going by Msi Afterbuner

 

[gasolin]

I have been playing around with a couple Titan X cards. Is there a reason why they only show 4095 RAM? I assume Unigen doesn't support more?

Why this low minimum fps are your pc the bottleneck?

 

[MrGenius]

Here's my attempt
View attachment 74718

Clocks TYPED OUT please. With GPU clocks corrected for true boost during the benchmark. If the boost clocks are less than shown in the screenshot you need to state that. CPU-Z and GPU-Z don't prove anything to me. I will be forced to list what they say IF that's all I can see. In this case I can see 1455MHz for the GPU core in the screenshot. So that's what I'm listing it as. If that's not correct you need to say so. I will not list 1253MHz because you haven't asked me to. And I don't believe it's accurate anyway. I'd bet it's either 1455MHz or somewhere in between. I don't know because I'm not you.

 

[gasolin]

I took out my second asus gtx 960 strix 4gb (to return it and later get a used gtx 980) and took a benchmark with the card left in my pc, i tried honeyview but couldn't find out how to take a screenshot after the tga picture was showed in honeyview, because it moved the pictiure to the honeyview folder as a tga file, so i used greenshot to take a screenshot, not interested in getting verified so it's okay if i don't get verified

who is the score?

Update i think it's not running x16 så i have to move my gpu from the lowest red pci e to the top red pci e ex press (asus vii ranger z97)

 

[gasolin]

fps 35.6 score 896 minimum score 18.6 max fps 80.4

pci-e x16 didn't make a diffrence other then a bit lower minimum fps and higher max fps

 

[MrGenius]

It's not great. But I'll take it anyway.

Honeyview is super simple to use. Let me show you.

Do like so.

Then like so.

And you'll get like so.

Then you can take that JPEG image and upload it. Then insert it into your post.

Simple as that.

 

[gasolin]

Right click on the tga file and choose convert with honeyview

 

[gasolin]

I get around 20 minimum fps but some of you with a much more powerfull gpu get lower score then my oced gtx 960 and i7 4790k running 4.5 ghz

 

[MrGenius]

Heaven is brutal on any setup.

But....I'm almost about to hit 1100 points!!! Just got 1098 @ 1212MHz with the newest Crimson drivers. Inching my way towards my goal 1 point/MHz at a time here.

Today might just be the day...

Or not. Give 'er a small breather. Then give it a go @ 1214MHz. 1213MHz just farted out on me. Lost a point.

Bah! Hitting the wall again. 1215MHz same as 1212MHz. Not a good sign.

Oh well. Gives me something to look forward to with the next driver release.

 

[D007]

I'm sure I've taken this test and like all others. Not sure how I'm not on it but ok..lol

 

[MrGenius]

I'm sure I've taken this test and like all others. Not sure how I'm not on it but ok..lol

It's not a test. If it was...you just failed. Because your score is on the list. But if you can't find it...that's your problem. Not mine. Sorry.

Hint: Click the "Spoiler : Sub Top 10 Multi GPU Scores" then type your screen name in the Filter box. Do you see it now?

 

[MrGenius]

Spoiler: Bad news of a very personal nature

Hey guys. I need to make a statement about what's going on with me right now. As I'm going to need to step away from my duties as far as these benchmark threads are concerned and my participation in this site in general. Something terrible has happened in my family. I'm really devastated and in a state of shock about it. And I'm going to need a little time to recover from it. I'll be back as soon as I can. I'm not going to let this ruin my life. I'm going to accept it for what it is. I need to grieve the loss as it is required to cope with the situation. But I also understand in time it will get better and easier for me. Such is life. And I am strong enough to survive this. I will make it through this. I know I can. I know I will.

I chose this thread to say this due to the title. I'm not a religious person. And I don't necessarily believe in a God or a real Heaven. I don't rule it out. And sometimes I hope for it to be. If there is a God and a Heaven for those deserving of it, then my brother surely resides there now. He didn't deserve the life fraught with suffering and misery that his became. He didn't choose to be mentally ill. He never meant to hurt anyone. He never purposely did anything to make anyone's life miserable including his own. What he did was not really his fault. His mind was sick. And he couldn't make it better. I know he would have it he could. He did try. I know he did his best. I know deep in his heart he loved us all. Even though at times his mind told him we were all conspiring against him. It tore my heart out to witness him be so troubled an inable to deal with reality. But it's over now. That is the one good thing about this. He is no longer suffering. I'm sad to see him go. But happy for him to be free of trouble permanently. I will miss him as no words can properly describe. And I will love him eternally.

It's too difficult for me to understand what happened today. The facts are not yet fully known to my family and I at this point. The circumstances regarding his death are still under investigation. What we do know is that he was shot and killed by a police officer, or possibly 2 police officers. They came to his apartment this afternoon to serve a warrant for failure to appear on a misdemeanor offense. He may or may not have done something to justify their actions. At this point I can't possibly understand what or why. He certianly didn't own or possess any firearms. Or even any deadly weapons of any kind that I know of. I don't know why they would choose to kill him. They haven't told us yet what he did. If I do find out that his death was unjustified the person(s) involved will have created an unending nightmare for themselves. I will haunt them to their graves. If they are guilty of any wrong doing they are going to pay for it to the fullest extent of the law.

I really need to go now. But I shall return. The one last thing I want to say before I go is I love you Travis. I always have and I always will. You were my brother and my best friend. It's too bad it had to end like this. But I will carry on without you. And live my life for you. You didn't deserve this. No matter what they say this will forever be true. Good bye my brother. I'm sorry I couldn't have been there for you more than I was. I hope you know I would have taken a bullet for you. Without a second thought.

 

[Caring1]

Wow, so sad for your loss man, I feel for you.

 

[MrGenius]

I'm feeling much better now. I wasn't sure how long it would take me to get back on my feet again. I really need something(s) right now to help take my mind off of the situation as much as possible. There's little I can do about it at this point. What I can I am. Most of which is moving myself forward, and not letting this drag me down. Since I know that's what he would want me to do. So let the threads resume. Thanks for your patience and understanding.

 

[Traconis]

My first try here
First of my rigs
Alienware 17 i7-6700hq 2.6Ghz 8gb ddr4, GPU clocks as per Heaven 1261 gpu clock /3000 gpu memory clock
(cant overclock gpu more with Nvidia inspector )

RESULT:

i7-6700HQ @ 2.6GHz + GTX 980M @ 1261/3000 = 1346

Also this is a laptop so every time I disabling Intel 530 heaven crashes and cant run it (even after reboot)
Tomorrow Alienware Aurora R4

 

[Machinematrix]

Can't wait to see GTX 1080 scores

 

[scevism]

Tried to run it 1920x1080 in the options always defaults to my native display 1366x751 or 1360x768 but this was the result.

 

[Machinematrix]

Tried to run it 1920x1080 in the options always defaults to my native display 1366x751 or 1360x768 but this was the result.
View attachment 75030

You have to enable DSR in your drivers, this will allow your GPU to run at any resolution, even if your monitor does not support it.

 

[MrGenius]

Tried to run it 1920x1080 in the options always defaults to my native display 1366x751 or 1360x768 but this was the result.

You have a 40" LCD with a native res. of 1366 x 768? With all the other nice system hardware you've got, what were you thinking there? It sort of defeats the purpose. Don't you think?

Anyways. If you want a score on one of the lists it needs to be at least 1680 x 1050. I'm not going to create a new list for any other lower non-FHD resolutions. Sorry. If it was up to me, I wouldn't even allow 1680 x 1050. But that's the way it was from the previous thread. So I left it that way out of consideration to the previous OP.

 

[scevism]

You have a 40" LCD with a native res. of 1366 x 768? With all the other nice system hardware you've got, what were you thinking there? It sort of defeats the purpose. Don't you think?

Anyways. If you want a score on one of the lists it needs to be at least 1680 x 1050. I'm not going to create a new list for any other lower non-FHD resolutions. Sorry. If it was up to me, I wouldn't even allow 1680 x 1050. But that's the way it was from the previous thread. So I left it that way out of consideration to the previous OP.

Very true saving up at the mo to get a nice monitor. It's long over due