- Joined
- Jun 21, 2016
- Messages
- 1,125 (0.36/day)
System Name | Team Crimson |
---|---|
Processor | AMD FX 8320 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 |
Cooling | Corsair H80i |
Memory | DDR3 16GB Crucial Ballistix Sport |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire Nitro+ RX 480 8GB RAM |
Storage | Samsung 850 EVO 250GB / Crucial MX300 275GB |
Display(s) | AOC 2752H 27" 1080p |
Case | NZXT Source 220 Windowed |
Power Supply | Antec Earthworks 650W |
Mouse | Logitech M510/ AGPTEK T-90 Zelotes |
Keyboard | Logitech K360/ iBUYPOWER TTC RED Switch Mechanical |
Software | Windows 8.1 64 Bit |
GTX 1060, because AMD cards not doing great in Arma 3 and their drivers are still utter mess. That's from my own experience. I tried really hard to like it but it simply did not work for me. Not trying to start a war green vs red; if AMD cards and their drivers suits your needs - cool, I'm honestly happy for you. Performance wise both cards are very similar, RX480 slightly more power hungry but cheaper than GTX 1060.
In my experience with ARMA 3, it is AMD CPUs that don't well, the GPU's work just fine.
Since ARMA 3 supports Crossfire, 2 x RX 480's would be a less costly way to improve performance on higher resolutions, though the issues with ARMA 3 are not the graphics, but the lack of CPU core utilization where Intel's cache speeds are the biggest factor.