THREAD CLOSED!!! Post Your AMD RyZen Blender Benchmarks at 200 Samples!

[natr0n]

Guys i believe i finally understood where the confusion with the blender bench is coming from.
First obviously on the Live stream they did the CPUs took around 36 seconds but on unknown version of Blender and unknown samples count!

The 100 samples count comes from the closed doors presentation that has been done a week earlier i believe and the videos from there.

actually on this video i swear i think it is 24.82 but can't be sure someone with bigger display to confirm.

According to the Videos they were runing Blender 2.77 at 100 samples and task was completed in around 25/26 seconds according to WCCFTECH below are the numbers but not sure from where since they were around 36 on the live one.

http://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-zen-cpu-benchmarks-official/

AMD RYZEN ES (3.4 GHz) 25.57s
Intel Core i7-6900K (3.7 GHz) 26.01s

I believe on the live stream the bench was done with 150 samples atleast looks like this given the results if it can be set to 150 cause i don't have blender and i don't know.

 

[Tomgang]

Here is how a 8 year old I7 920 @ 4.1 GHz handles it. So slow....

Render 100 56.16

Render 200 1.50.40

 

[xorbe]

AT forum is suggesting not 100, but 128 which is the supposedly the default Blender value before loading the file. 100 was from another video (not from the live stream) which rendered in 25 not 36 seconds apparently.

 

[Ferrum Master]

30.73s from me using 100 samples.
39.19s using 128 samples.
1:01.24 using 200 samples.

 

[R0H1T]

AT forum is suggesting not 100, but 128 which is the supposedly the default Blender value before loading the file. 100 was from another video (not from the live stream) which rendered in 25 not 36 seconds apparently.

At this point in time someone will just have to work their way backwards to get 6900K scores, with blender version 2.77 or 2.78, then try to match the AMD demo scores ranging from 20~40s & post their OC, NB & memory clocks so on & so forth

Basically a mini blender review

 

[Kathode]

6800k @4.5GHz(4.5GHz AVX), 3.6GHz Cache, DualChannel 3200,
Just ran the demo with 3 different sampling settings,
firstly, 100 samples, 17.16s

150 samples, 25.53s

200 samples, 34.51s

 

[DLGenesis]

1:02.84

 

[NdMk2o1o]

Wow 7 pages in......

 

[Nordic]

4790k at stock with 1:09.7

 

[xkm1948]

Wow 7 pages in......

Like many have said. I have never seen so many intel processors happily rendering the nude picture of an AMD processor.

 

[VulkanBros]

FX-9590 - 2:13.51

 

[m0nt3]

Seems, I may need to try this benchmark on a Windows installation on my PC. See if I get similar results as the other FX people.

 

[cdawall]

5960x@4600 40:13

 

[Gasaraki]

5960x@4600 40:13

I don't know why people are testing @4.whatever. The demo was a i7 8-core @3.4 not 4.6GHz. We want to see 200 and 100 rendering time @ that speed. That way we can compare to the demo.

 

[NdMk2o1o]

I don't know why people are testing @4.whatever. The demo was a i7 8-core @3.4 not 4.6GHz. We want to see 200 and 100 rendering time @ that speed. That way we can compare to the demo.

maybe you should change the OP to reflect that... oh wait!

 

[cdawall]

I don't know why people are testing @4.whatever. The demo was a i7 8-core @3.4 not 4.6GHz. We want to see 200 and 100 rendering time @ that speed. That way we can compare to the demo.

Benchmark thread is benchmark thread. I don't run stock speeds.

 

[xkm1948]

Cleaned up the rules a little bit.

1. Removed the RYZEN reference. Who knows what sample size they were running!
2. Set 200 as standards across the board. Only 200 sample results will be recorded.

Have to grad my students' finals. I will be back after a while.

 

[Senbonzakura]

AMD you the simply pitiful piece of lying dung!!! of AMD was used special version of blender . Here photo and video proof !!!!

Сore 3930K 4.5 ггц 24.04 !!!!!!!

 

[aaalllsss]

 

[NdMk2o1o]

AMD you the simply pitiful piece of lying dung!!! of AMD was used special version of blender . Here photo and video proof !!!!

Сore 3930K 4.5 ггц 24.04 !!!!!!!

Thank's Mr registered today with 2 posts today, we shall forever appreciate your enlightenment oh wise one. please do stay and continue to enrich our lives with your oh so meaningful input......

 

[alucasa]

Here are mine. This is why I am not going to back pitiful 4c/8t.

20 seconds for 100 samples.

41 seconds for 200 samples.

Bonus: 22 seconds @ 100 samples with 1060 6GB (CUDA)

 

[biffzinker]

Here are mine. This is why I am not going to back pitiful 4c/8t.

20 seconds for 100 samples.

41 seconds for 200 samples.

Bonus: 22 seconds @ 100 samples with 1060 6GB (CUDA)

View attachment 82025

View attachment 82026

Good job @alucasa, of course you have said this was why you went more cores.

 

[alucasa]

Good job @alucasa, of course you have said this was why you went more cores.

Yeppers, I built my rig specifically for Blender.

I spend far mroe hours for Blender than I do for games.

Edit: 200 sample is not a realistic sample rate. Nobody renders with just 200. 900 sample is the bare minimum I'd use for any semi-final render with 2025 samples as final.

 

[cdawall]

Here are mine. This is why I am not going to back pitiful 4c/8t.

20 seconds for 100 samples.

41 seconds for 200 samples.

Bonus: 22 seconds @ 100 samples with 1060 6GB (CUDA)

View attachment 82025

View attachment 82026

My cores beat your cores

 

[alucasa]

My cores beat your cores

Yeah, yeah. I concede, are you happy, sire?

In my defense, it uses less power and cost me less probably.