- Joined
- Dec 27, 2012
- Messages
- 226 (0.05/day)
- Location
- Athens,Greece
Last time I checked, extreme overclocking (ex. Liquid Nitrogen cooling) was not your thing guys.
Otherwise you would appreciate/recognize the importance of this vs skylake overclockability.
Thats why your judgement and mindset is pretty much (unfortunately) "not on point".
Sorry for being harsh though but if you can't really judge what is good "xoc-wise" then stick to the air/water ocability that will probably please you all (5+ GHz on air vs a maximum of 4.7/4.8 on good skylake chips).
Which is only good for reference speed/frequency and not actual performance (benchmarks), as mentioned above.
Otherwise you would appreciate/recognize the importance of this vs skylake overclockability.
Thats why your judgement and mindset is pretty much (unfortunately) "not on point".
Sorry for being harsh though but if you can't really judge what is good "xoc-wise" then stick to the air/water ocability that will probably please you all (5+ GHz on air vs a maximum of 4.7/4.8 on good skylake chips).
Am i the only one pondering how this is even newsworthy didn't stilt hit over 8.7 on an fx processor like mine over two years ago??.
Which is only good for reference speed/frequency and not actual performance (benchmarks), as mentioned above.