Exactly. The thing uses XFR to hit 4.1 GHz... and that's on one core also (full core boost is 3.7Ghz). Running all cores past 4ghz will be a struggle on some air solutions. I don't see much past 4.4ghz on custom water.
Precisely the reason indeed to stay away from the 8c/16t for gaming. It's not rocket science, it's been the dominant idea in the past decade and for as long as there is a platform above the quad core mainstream that consistently clocks lower.
The real question here, or at least to me, is therefore the OC capability not of the R7's but of the R5's and lower part of the product stack. If AMD can put out a 6c/12t that hits 4.5 on air at the aforementioned price points... that's one killer cpu.
The 'easily achievable' clock on air is the one thing that's really going to be the key factor in determining whether the AMD product is inferior or not. If you need water to achieve a clock that Intel CPUs can already hit on a 20 dollar air cooler, then that automatically adds a price/effort/risk premium to the AMD cpu in a like-for-like comparison, add some silicon lottery uncertainty on top and it's all too easy going back to Intel again. In that light, I completely understand why the R5 is 'waiting it out' for Q2. Let the dust settle and give them time to get better yields, allowing XFR to stretch its legs, while the super-eager AMD fans buy into the top tier of the product stack like they would've done anyway.
Summer's also a great time to build systems imo. You get realistic temps and set everything for worst case room temperatures right off the bat.
I can see some upgrading plans materializing here ^^