- Joined
- Mar 18, 2008
- Messages
- 5,717 (0.92/day)
System Name | Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics |
---|---|
Processor | Undead CPU |
Motherboard | Undead TUF X99 |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15 |
Memory | GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000 |
Video Card(s) | EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra |
Storage | Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB |
Display(s) | 32'' 4K Dell |
Case | Fractal Design R5 |
Audio Device(s) | BOSE 2.0 |
Power Supply | Seasonic 850watt |
Mouse | Logitech Master MX |
Keyboard | Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue |
VR HMD | HTC Vive + Oculus Quest 2 |
Software | Windows 10 P |
What you said there means Fiji is a monster in raw power. That monster was mainly held back by software and by its arch not being best for DX9-11 and lower res than 4K due to single CPU thread usage. Agreed. By that logic, if Vega's arch is changed from Fiji's in order not to depend its being used properly by the software should be performing very well. Especially in 4K gaming that shows raw power more clearly as Fiji's position in 4K chart shows.
In an ideal world where hardware performance won't be hindered by software.
Yes. However upon learning to code for OpenCL I have found that it is a lot easier to be lazy and let the hardware designer handle the optimization part.