• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Editorial AMD Issues Official Statement on RX Vega 64 Pricing Woes

Raevenlord

News Editor
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,755 (1.23/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI X570 MAG TOMAHAWK
Cooling Lian Li Galahad 360mm AIO
Memory 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3733 (4x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3070 Ti
Storage Boot: Transcend MTE220S 2TB, Kintson A2000 1TB, Seagate Firewolf Pro 14 TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case Lian Li O11DX Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
Update: Related to this story, feast your eyes on Newegg's deal of the day, with a reference, standard Sapphire RX Vega 64 for $689.99 with two "free" games. I don't think I've ever seen such a conturbated launch as this. Also, considering the scope and content of the article, I will be updating the tag for this piece as an Editorial.

There has been somewhat of an uproar in recent times regarding AMD's lack of clarity on pricing of their newly-launched Vega 64. While AMD themselves told reviewers and consumers that their RX Vega graphics cards would be available for $399 (Vega 56) and $499 (Vega 64), recent events have, at the very least, cast some doubts on Vega's supposedly clean-cut pricing. Some popular reviewers and YouTubers have even gone so far as to say they won't be accepting any more samples from AMD due to a perceived slight at the erroneous information provided by the company; when someone reviews and analyses a product based on a fixed price-point advanced by a company, and then that pricing seems to have turned out nothing more than smoke and mirrors... People's work is put out the window.

Now, AMD has come out to put rumors of false Vega pricing announcements to rest. Except the skeptic in me remains, well... skeptic. Here's what AMD has said: "Radeon RX Vega 64 demand continues to exceed expectations. AMD is working closely with its partners to address this demand. Our initial launch quantities included standalone Radeon RX Vega 64 at SEP of $499, Radeon RX Vega 64 Black Packs at SEP of $599, and Radeon RX Vega 64 Aqua Packs at SEP of $699. We are working with our partners to restock all SKUs of Radeon RX Vega 64 including the standalone cards and Gamer Packs over the next few weeks, and you should expect quantities of Vega to start arriving in the coming days."





Do you agree with me when I say that AMD isn't committing to a base $499 pricing for RX Vega 64? Expressions like "limited launch quantities included standalone Radeon RX Vega 64 at SEP of $499" don't really clear the air as to when (if) such pricing will be restocked. At best, AMD seems to only be saying that they'll restock some token offerings for their RX Vega graphics cards, if nothing else, simply looking to curb doubts on RX Vega's MSRP. Yes, it does start at $499 - but there is no true availability at that pricing, because AMD only restocks limited quantities at that pricing through (apparently) rebates and other offerings to retailers. And AMD left a crystal clear sentence of "we'll be restocking Vega SKUs at the announced $499 pricing" conspicuously absent.

The issue is that multiple retailers have come out, one way or another, to say that AMD have, in fact, issued changes to the RX Vega 64's retail pricing. OC UK's Andrew Gibson (Gibbo), the source we quoted in our first story that put forward some doubts on AMD's real RX Vega pricing intentions, gave KitGuru some clarifications on his initial claims on OC UK's forums: "Launch price was $499 with NO games for the Black card, as outlined to us by AMD as a launch only price. AMD allowed us to sell a set amount at this price, which was several hundred, clearly not enough as they were sold out in approximately 15 minutes. After this the regular price was $599 with FREE games for both the black and silver cards, $699 for the aqua card plus taxes." Another retailer, this time Norwegian komplett.no, also said that AMD's RX Vega 64 stock to be sold at MSRP $499 was limited to 275, as the company was "allowed to sell at a favorable price at launch. The RX Vega 64 version we had for sale was in a limited edition of this price and will unfortunately not be put up for sale again."

OcUK's Andrew Gibson went on to say that AMD's launch price of £449 "(...) is not possible, $499 is below what they cost us direct from the board partners by a large chunk of cash, AMD rebated us to hit $499 on a set amount of units. As such $599 is now the minimum." The retailer representative also went on to say that "Unfortunately AMD did not make the launch pricing plan clear at all to the press or the consumer, which has caused a lot of confusion, if we could sell cards at £449 and make money, they'd be at that price. If that was the case we probably would have sold around 5,000 units now at OcUK, whereas the reality is we've sold a little over 1000."

Over at Gamers Nexus, Steve Burke has voiced what sources inside the retailer family have been quietly putting out: that AMD did allow retailers to sell limited quantities of the RX Vega 64 SKU at $499 through time and quantity-limited rebates so as to allow retailers to sell part of their Vega 64 cards at AMD's announced pricing. AMD's Radeon Packs have apparently seen the highest alocation of Vega graphics cards on AMD's part, because this allows the company to recoup their losses at selling RX Vega 64 - and soon, RX Vega 56 - at their announced MSRP. It seems that AMD's BOM for their monolithic, 484 mm² dies and exotic HBM2 memory (as well as R&D expenses, naturally) have increased RX Vega's manufacturing cost to the point where (sources are claiming; take this with a grain of salt) AMD loses more than $100 on each RX Vega consumer card sold. Perhaps it's only a coincidence that Vega's retailer pricing increase covers both AMD's estimated manufacturing costs, as well as retailer's margins. Perhaps not. But there has been enough smoke dotting the aftermath of Vega's rise that it's likely there is fire.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Last edited:

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.44/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
I do like how they're bundling hardware with other hardware (monitors, motherboards, and processors) which makes them unattractive to miners. Unfortunately, that doesn't work for people looking to just upgrade their GPU.
 
Last edited:

Raevenlord

News Editor
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,755 (1.23/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI X570 MAG TOMAHAWK
Cooling Lian Li Galahad 360mm AIO
Memory 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3733 (4x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3070 Ti
Storage Boot: Transcend MTE220S 2TB, Kintson A2000 1TB, Seagate Firewolf Pro 14 TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case Lian Li O11DX Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
I do like how they're bundling hardware with other hardware (monitors, motherboards, and processors) which makes them unattractive to miners. Unfortunately, that doesn't work for people looking to just upgrade their GPU.


Sceptic is a weird way to spell skeptic.

I'm skeptic that you've seen what you think you've seen...

Thanks =)
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.44/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
I certainly hope they're not losing $100 per card @ $500. If it is, no wonder NVIDIA is avoiding HBM2 like the plague and AMD did an epic stupid.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 24, 2014
Messages
1,269 (0.34/day)
Location
Birmingham UK
System Name El Calpulator
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 7800X3D
Motherboard ASRock X670E Pro RS
Cooling ArcticCooling Freezer 3 360ARGB AIO
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengance 6000Mhz C30
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 4080 Gaming Trio X @ 2925 / 23500 mhz
Storage 5TB nvme SSD + Synology DS115j NAS with 4TB HDD
Display(s) Samsung G8 34" QD-OLED + Samsung 28" 4K 60hz UR550
Case Montech King 95 PRO Blue
Audio Device(s) SB X4+Logitech Z623 2.1+Astro A50 Wireless
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 1000W ATX 3.0 80+ Gold
Mouse Logitech G502X Plus LightSpeed Hero Wireless plus Logitech G POWERPLAY Wireless Charging Mouse Pad
Keyboard Logitech G915 LightSpeed Wireless
Software Win 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores Just enough
I am not sure why people even buy the Vega 64, maybe for the compute power. Imo this card is a total fail for gaming
 
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
993 (0.18/day)
Location
Michigan
System Name Daves
Processor AMD Ryzen 3900x
Motherboard AsRock X570 Taichi
Cooling Enermax LIQMAX III 360
Memory 32 GiG Team Group B Die 3600
Video Card(s) Powercolor 5700 xt Red Devil
Storage Crucial MX 500 SSD and Intel P660 NVME 2TB for games
Display(s) Acer 144htz 27in. 2560x1440
Case Phanteks P600S
Audio Device(s) N/A
Power Supply Corsair RM 750
Mouse EVGA
Keyboard Corsair Strafe
Software Windows 10 Pro
"prciing" on the last line.

I certainly hope they're not losing $100 per card @ $500. If it is, no wonder NVIDIA is avoiding HBM2 like the plague and AMD did an epic stupid.

It's not stupid, it brings HBM2 into the main stream, companies do this often..
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2012
Messages
1,606 (0.35/day)
Location
Northamptonshire, UK
System Name Main / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 7 7800X3D / Ryzen 7 2700
Motherboard Aorus B650M Elite AX/ B450i Aorus Pro Wifi
Cooling Lian-Li Galahad 360 / Wraith Spire
Memory Corsair Vengeance 2x16 6000MHz CL30 / HyperX Predator 2x8GB 3200MHz
Video Card(s) RTX 3080 FE / ARC A380
Storage WD Black SN770 1TB / Sabrent Rocket 256GB
Display(s) Aorus FO32U2P / 39" Panasonic HDTV
Case Fractal Arc XL / Cougar QBX
Audio Device(s) Denon AVR-X2800H / Realtek ALC1220
Power Supply Corsair RM850 / BeQuiet SFX Power 2 450W
Mouse Logitech G903
Keyboard Drop Sense75 with WQ Studio Morandi's
VR HMD Rift S
Software Win 11 Pro 64Bit
It's not stupid, it brings HBM2 into the main stream, companies do this often..

By sacrificing themselves for the greater good in the process? I don't think I have heard anyone doing this before.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.44/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
It's not stupid, it brings HBM2 into the main stream, companies do this often..
$500+ is not mainstream.

I get what you mean though that SK Hynix/Samsung/AMD are trying to get volumes up so HBM2 will become more affordable. At the same time, NVIDIA is in a lot better financial position to do that than AMD is. I'd still argue what AMD did is incredibly stupid if it's true.
 
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
3,890 (0.82/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory Team Group Dark Pro 8Pack Edition 3600Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 FE
Storage Kingston A2000 1TB + Seagate HDD workhorse
Display(s) Samsung 50" QN94A Neo QLED
Case Antec 1200
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX-850
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech UltraX
Software Windows 11
This whole launch has been a mess, and it does seem increasingly likely they can't really compete on price no matter how they try to spin it.

The 314 mm² GP104 must have given them countless sleepless nights.
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
2,693 (0.42/day)
System Name panda
Processor 6700k
Motherboard sabertooth s
Cooling raystorm block<black ice stealth 240 rad<ek dcc 18w 140 xres
Memory 32gb ripjaw v
Video Card(s) 290x gamer<ntzx g10<antec 920
Storage 950 pro 250gb boot 850 evo pr0n
Display(s) QX2710LED@110hz lg 27ud68p
Case 540 Air
Audio Device(s) nope
Power Supply 750w superflower
Mouse g502
Keyboard shine 3 with grey, black and red caps
Software win 10
Benchmark Scores http://hwbot.org/user/marsey99/
a well written piece dude. clearly highlighting the known facts, and current rumours, along side your own take on the events. pieces like this are why many of us love tpu, compared to the others who only incite the hate.

i wonder if any of the aib/aic partners are going to lift the lid on this hot box and let us all see what these smoke and mirrors are hiding?

i doubt it, but we can live in hope, right :D

help us msi, you're our only hope!
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
932 (0.13/day)
Location
Ireland
System Name "Run of the mill" (except GPU)
Processor R9 3900X
Motherboard ASRock X470 Taich Ultimate
Cooling Cryorig (not recommended)
Memory 32GB (2 x 16GB) Team 3200 MT/s, CL14
Video Card(s) Radeon RX6900XT
Storage Samsung 970 Evo plus 1TB NVMe
Display(s) Samsung Q95T
Case Define R5
Audio Device(s) On board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 1000W
Mouse Roccat Leadr
Keyboard K95 RGB
Software Windows 11 Pro x64, insider preview dev channel
Benchmark Scores #1 worldwide on 3D Mark 99, back in the (P133) days. :)
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
8,217 (2.16/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF gaming B650
Cooling Artic Liquid Freezer 2 - 420mm
Memory G.Skill Sniper 32gb DDR5 6000
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 4070 ti super 16gb
Storage Samsung EVO 500gb & 1Tb, 2tb HDD, 500gb WD Black
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) - SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Steeseries Esports Wireless
Keyboard Corsair K100
Software windows 10 H
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814202300

price listed is $689.99

so according to the article thats $100 for the games, games I dont want have no interest in playing. That leaves $90 for price gouging or whatever excuse there is for Newegg to tack on, or is this AMD's aggressive price "structuring"?
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,839 (3.95/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Demand my ass. People don't care about Vega: Vega64 and Vega56 reviews combined got a little over 300 comments on TPU. One review for RX 580 (the Sapphire one) got 170 - and that was just a refreshed product.

Vega may be a stepping stone for AMD, but people were expecting another Ryzen and Vega is not one. As soon as Nvidia bothers to slash prices a little on the 1080 and 1070, Vega will be forgotten.
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2011
Messages
165 (0.03/day)
Location
Israel
System Name Negra5
Processor i5 6500
Motherboard ASUS Z170M-Plus
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper TX3
Memory Kingston HyperX 16GB DDR4
Video Card(s) PNY GTX-1070, XFX RX480
Storage Gigabyte 256GB SSD, WD 1TB HDD, WD 4TB HDD.
Display(s) SAMSUNG 32" FullHD
Case GAMING EAGLE WARRIOR CG-06R1
Audio Device(s) nVidia HD Audio
Power Supply Corsair GS800W 80 Plus Bronze
Mouse Cooler Master Devastator MS2k
Keyboard Cooler Master Devastator MB24
Software Windows 10 20H2
Benchmark Scores Pfft
"prciing" on the last line.

I certainly hope they're not losing $100 per card @ $500. If it is, no wonder NVIDIA is avoiding HBM2 like the plague and AMD did an epic stupid.

Stupid is a rather small word for that. So the RX 64 equal or slower than the GTX1080, with higher TDP and actually more expensive. All of this while Vega is at 14nm and Pascal at 16nm. This was supposed to be Raja's baby...

I'm still going to get one because the hashrate is high enough, and i pay peanuts in electricity cost, so it fits my needs... but as a gaming GPU i would never consider this power Hog. It's not horrible, just late and too power hungry.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
5,717 (0.93/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) 32'' 4K Dell
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
VR HMD HTC Vive + Oculus Quest 2
Software Windows 10 P
Summoning @RejZoR @Vya Domus for the defense of the sacred RTG.

Seriously though I wish @W1zzard can alter the review score for the Vega64 and 56. As it stands now it is quite misleading in terms of performance per dollar.

Bad Raja, bad RTG. As someone who has been exclusively using ATi GPU to this point I am disgusted
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.87/day)
Demand my ass. People don't care about Vega: Vega64 and Vega56 reviews combined got a little over 300 comments on TPU. One review for RX 580 (the Sapphire one) got 170 - and that was just a refreshed product.

Vega may be a stepping stone for AMD, but people were expecting another Ryzen and Vega is not one. As soon as Nvidia bothers to slash prices a little on the 1080 and 1070, Vega will be forgotten.

Well, a lot of people go with Vega because of FreeSync (a lot of them were waiting for higher end AMD product for this very reason). I personally don't care because I have a classic monitor that's neither FreeSync or G-Sync (well, can be upgraded to G-Sync, but I don't care, am using Fast/Adaptive V-Sync). AMD, even if it cocked up performance crown position, they've bet a lot on FreeSync and it kinda paid off for them apparently. And with added Enhanced Sync, they kinda locked in current users with normal monitors who might buy FreeSync monitor soon. Looks like this whole pushing of FreeSync is one of better marketing thinsg AMD did in quite a while...

As for the whole "Performance per dollar" thing and all the bitching over price shift, people really look at those numbers alone when deciding for purchase? When I checked for GTX 1080Ti, I just scrolled through tests of interest at 1080p, roughly compared it to my current card to see how much of a difference there is to evaluate if it's worth it and when I was satisfied with the findings, I went to online stores and checked the models I fancy. When I found one of my liking, I bought it. It's literally that simple and I've been buying graphic cards like this for years and years. This becomes even more of an issue when looking fancy aftermarket cooled ones where prices can vary quite a lot. I could go with cheapest one, but decided to go with beefier cooler, better cooled VRAM, better backplate etc. Perf per dollar really only applies between reference models where design isn't a factor in the pricing. I don't know, I just make the decision how much certain performance is worth on my own.
 
Joined
May 11, 2016
Messages
261 (0.08/day)
I'd give AMD more benefit of the doubt, if not for the fact that they specifically explained that their reason for the long Vega delay (and over a year after the NV 1070/1080 release) was to make sure that there was plenty of inventory so this would not be an issue.

And regardless, even with very underwhelming mining performance, everywhere sold out within hours if not minutes. We also got the price gouging right at launch as well. I honestly don't know why someone would purchase one for mining with it's MH/s and power numbers. Unless Ether doubles in price soon buyers will never even break even much less a profit. I can only imagine how bad inventories would be if the Vega actually did do 70-100 MH/s if the false pre-release rumors had turned out to be true.

Vega is modestly competitive at retail prices. At $100+ over retail, people must have money to burn.
 
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Messages
660 (0.18/day)
Location
Scotland
Processor 5800x
Motherboard b550-e
Cooling full - custom liquid loop
Memory cl16 - 32gb
Video Card(s) 6800xt
Storage nvme 1TB + ssd 750gb
Display(s) xg32vc
Case hyte y60
Power Supply 1000W - gold
Software 10
we will see much cost nvidia next year when they jump on ddr6

and amd will have expierence with hbm2, and next generation navi will be much better and cheaper if we compare perfomance per price.

I certainly hope they're not losing $100 per card @ $500. If it is, no wonder NVIDIA is avoiding HBM2 like the plague and AMD did an epic stupid.
 

the54thvoid

Super Intoxicated Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
13,109 (2.39/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar B650 (wifi)
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory 32GB Kingston Fury
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX4070ti
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 M.2 1TB / Samsumg 960 Pro M.2 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Asus Prime AP201
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply be quiet! Pure POwer M12 850w Gold (ATX3.0)
Software W10
It's nice to see everybody's friend AMD being dishonest.

I swear to almighty Jen-Sun Huang that if Nvidia had done this, it'd be WW freaking 3. (I'm trying to swear less).

I watched the Linus WAN thing somone posted up recently and it was fun to watch. He was quite clear that AIB partners made a lot less money from AMD. Also, he was critical of Nvidia too for the unboxing nonsense for 1080ti but hey - it's the fashion now- free press for either brand. Then he went back to the panel and they said it would be quite correct for all reviewers to re-evaluate scores based on value as AMD simply lied about the general pricing.

Yeah, AMD lied, misled or were dishonest. Suck on those shiny red plums.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,499 (3.27/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
Summoning @RejZoR @Vya Domus for the defense of the sacred RTG.

Yeah , the defenders of sacred RTG , both owners of Nvidia cards :laugh:. We're more like exiled traitors still carrying the red flame in our hearts.

I have nothing to say. AMD screwed up the prices. Doesn't benefit anyone really , AMD makes probably close to nothing on these cards. I am not surprised at all , I have said it long before this , Vega is expensive as fuck to manufacture , seems like they tried to price is too low to the point when it became unprofitable not only to them but to AIBs and retailers as well and it all backfired.

Considering how few of these were available in the first place , I am hard pressed to say this is such a huge thing. After all prices of 1060/1070/480/470/580/570 in the last months have screwed up the perf/price ratio as well , haven't they ? And in much larger quantities. We can't see the forest for the trees or what ?
 
Last edited:

the54thvoid

Super Intoxicated Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
13,109 (2.39/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar B650 (wifi)
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory 32GB Kingston Fury
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX4070ti
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 M.2 1TB / Samsumg 960 Pro M.2 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Asus Prime AP201
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply be quiet! Pure POwer M12 850w Gold (ATX3.0)
Software W10
Yeah , the defenders of sacred RTG , both owners of Nvidia cards :laugh:. We're more like exiled traitors still carrying the red flame in our hearts.

I have nothing to say. AMD screwed up the prices. Doesn't benefit anyone really , AMD makes probably close to nothing on these cards. I am not surprised at all , I have said it long before this , Vega is expensive as fuck to manufacture , seems like they tried to price is too low to the point when it became unprofitable not only to them but to AIBs and retailers as well and it all backfired.

Considering how few of these were available in the first place , I am hard pressed to say this is such a huge thing. After all prices of 1060/1070/480/470/580/570 in the last months have screwed up the perf/price ratio as well , haven't they ? And in much larger quantities. We can't see the forest for the trees or what ?

You're missing a really tangible point here man, c'mon dont be so weirdly AMD apathetic/defensive. Ready?

If AMD cannot manufacture a competitor in terms of R&D and BOM costs to the competition (who we know is fleecing us), in terms of business, they are in very big trouble. We're not talking abouty mining screwing up price/perf like you appear to be trying to deflect, we're talking about a company barely able to push out a top tier competitor at a reasonably profitable margin. If you can't make a profit margin on a product it's game over. Not that I'm saying AMD is finished but for this round Vega is a concrete block around their neck.

We all wanted Vega to be a match for 1080ti (look back a few months - that was the TPU wishlist ballpark) so we could see a price war but no, it's nowhere near a match and it's wildly more expensive than we're used to for AMD pricing. AMD need to change their approach.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,499 (3.27/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
You're missing a really tangible point here man, c'mon dont be so weirdly AMD apathetic/defensive. Ready?

If AMD cannot manufacture a competitor in terms of R&D and BOM costs to the competition (who we know is fleecing us), in terms of business, they are in very big trouble. We're not talking abouty mining screwing up price/perf like you appear to be trying to deflect, we're talking about a company barely able to push out a top tier competitor at a reasonably profitable margin. If you can't make a profit margin on a product it's game over. Not that I'm saying AMD is finished but for this round Vega is a concrete block around their neck.

We all wanted Vega to be a match for 1080ti (look back a few months - that was the TPU wishlist ballpark) so we could see a price war but no, it's nowhere near a match and it's wildly more expensive than we're used to for AMD pricing. AMD need to change their approach.

I don't think I am missing anything.

Every time I say Vega is not for gaming but for datacenters everyone loses their minds. There you have it , this situation is the ultimate argument for that.

AMD didn't have to beat anyone , more precisely they cannot afford to beat anyone this round , they don't have the resources. RX Vega fulfilled it's purpose as far as AMD is concerned , and that is to make people know they are still in the game. Not top dog but still alive. What they'll do next remains to be seen.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2010
Messages
2,355 (0.46/day)
Location
Right where I want to be
System Name Miami
Processor Ryzen 3800X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VII Formula
Cooling Ek Velocity/ 2x 280mm Radiators/ Alphacool fullcover
Memory F4-3600C16Q-32GTZNC
Video Card(s) XFX 6900 XT Speedster 0
Storage 1TB WD M.2 SSD/ 2TB WD SN750/ 4TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) DELL AW3420DW / HP ZR24w
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic XL
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Gold 1000W+750W
Mouse Corsair Scimitar/Glorious Model O-
Keyboard Corsair K95 Platinum
Software Windows 10 Pro
So the black card is more limited than the limited edition.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,988 (0.78/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ||| Intel Core i7-3930K
Motherboard ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR ||| Asus P9X79 WS
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S ||| Be Quiet Pure Rock
Memory Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz ||| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1333 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 3GB ||| MSI GTX 680 4GB
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB ||| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" ||| Eizo EV2416W 24"
Case Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2
Audio Device(s) Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus
Power Supply Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire XT
Software Ubuntu
I don't think I am missing anything.

Every time I say Vega is not for gaming but for datacenters everyone loses their minds. There you have it , this situation is the ultimate argument for that.

AMD didn't have to beat anyone , more precisely they cannot afford to beat anyone this round , they don't have the resources. RX Vega fulfilled it's purpose as far as AMD is concerned , and that is to make people know they are still in the game. Not top dog but still alive. What they'll do next remains to be seen.
No, Vega is nowhere near what AMD intended. And where is the 4× in performance per watt they promised?
Vega was intended to be the gaming king, but it turns out the performance per clock is worse than Fiji. Those who have been following it closely noticed a change in narrative around the demo at the end of last year, when AMD realized Vega10 would be in the GP104 league. Ever since then they've tried to focus on the "value" of Vega (with FreeSync) and it being "good enough".
 
Top