- Joined
- Jan 6, 2014
- Messages
- 599 (0.15/day)
- Location
- Germany
System Name | Main Machine |
---|---|
Processor | Intel i9-13900KS |
Motherboard | ASUS ROG Maximus Z790 Apex |
Cooling | Water cooling, 2x EK-DDC 3.2 PWM, 1x360mm+1x240mm+1x120mm EK, Mora 360 Pro, EK-Quantum Velocity 2 |
Memory | G.SKILL 32GB DDR5-7200, 7200J3445G16GX2-TZ5RS |
Video Card(s) | ASRock RX 7900 XTX Aqua |
Storage | 2x WD_BLACK SN850X 1TB und 2TB, 2x8TB Seagate Ironwolf |
Display(s) | ASUS ROG Strix XG27WQ 27inch 165Hz FreeSync Premium Pro |
Case | Cooler Master COSMOS C700P |
Audio Device(s) | Turtle Beach Elite Pro Tournament + Elite Pro TAC |
Power Supply | Corsair AX1600i 1600W Titanium |
Mouse | Logitech G903 LIGHTSPEED Wireless |
Keyboard | ROCCAT Ryos MK Pro |
Software | Win 11 |
Guru3d put up a review of the ASUS Radeon ROG RX Vega 64 STRIX:
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/asus_radeon_rog_rx_vega_64_strix_8gb_review,1.html
From what I read there STRIX does not sound very interesting solution.
I think custom liquid cooled reference card is much better than ASUS's solution.
It does not seem to bring much better performance than the reference card.
Editted:
Interesting enough Guru3d has taken down the review that they did on ASUS Radeon ROG RX Vega 64 STRIX:
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/review-asus-radeon-rog-rx-vega-64-strix-8gb.html
Here is the reason that Hilbert Hagedoorn wrote:
Makes me wonder how ASUS could do such a mistake.![Slap :slap: :slap:](https://tpucdn.com/forums/data/assets/smilies/slap-v1.gif)
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/asus_radeon_rog_rx_vega_64_strix_8gb_review,1.html
From what I read there STRIX does not sound very interesting solution.
I think custom liquid cooled reference card is much better than ASUS's solution.
It does not seem to bring much better performance than the reference card.
Editted:
Interesting enough Guru3d has taken down the review that they did on ASUS Radeon ROG RX Vega 64 STRIX:
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/review-asus-radeon-rog-rx-vega-64-strix-8gb.html
Here is the reason that Hilbert Hagedoorn wrote:
This morning I received a phone call from ASUS, asking us if we’d be willing to take down the article for a few days as they have made a mistake. The sample we received did not get a final BIOS for its final clock frequencies and fan tweaking. Ergo, the sample we received carries a default reference BIOS.
It’s a colossal mistake, but as such the end-results in the review are not representative enough for the final product. ASUS will get the finalized BIOS over once they have finished (likely a day or two) after which we will re-test the card with that final BIOS and thus republish the review. All this explains why the STRIX card was so incredibly close to Vega 64 performance. Apologies for the inconvenience, but this mistake was not one coming from us.
Makes me wonder how ASUS could do such a mistake.
![Slap :slap: :slap:](https://tpucdn.com/forums/data/assets/smilies/slap-v1.gif)
Last edited: