• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD "Navi" GPU by Q3-2018: Report

Joined
Sep 20, 2010
Messages
648 (0.12/day)
Location
TX
System Name Bandit 3.0
Processor AMD R7 5700X3D
Motherboard MSI B450 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
Cooling NZXT Kraken X53
Memory Anacomda 2x16GB @ 3200
Video Card(s) XFX Speedster MERC319 AMD RX 7800 XT
Storage Samsung 960 EVO m.2 500GB; Samsung 960 EVO m.2 1TB
Display(s) Acer XZ342CK (3440x1440)
Case NZXT H9 Flow
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 750
Mouse Razer DeathAdder V2 Pro
Keyboard ROCCAT Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 11 Professional
I know, it puzzles me why all Ryzen CPUs are being heavily discounted at retail - their latest and greatest ever - with no successor in sight? Doesn't make a lot of sense. Please enlighten me as to why Ryzen is losing popularity so quickly. I offered to build a Ryzen system for my nephew for his birthday this November. A week later he tells me he wants an Intel system, apparently because his friends laughed at him when he told them he was getting a Ryzen rig. Has AMD lost their mojo this quickly? What gives? What do teenage gamers know about it that we don't?

Zen+ is supposedly right around the corner for early 2018. That might explain some of the discounts we've seen lately. Also likely to better position themselves against Coffee Lake.

It sounds like your nephew's friends simply go for Intel because they've been touted as the best for years without any competition from AMD. I've spoken with friends who only build Intel machines because they're the best for gaming which is pretty much the same reasoning.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,731 (6.05/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
System Name Tiny the White Yeti
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling CPU: Thermalright Peerless Assassin / Case: Phanteks T30-120 x3
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
VR HMD HD 420 - Green Edition ;)
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
Here we go again, a full year of hype and much ado about nothing, only to end up with a product released in March/April 2019 that performs about 25% slower than its competitor.

When nothing has a set date, there is no set date, just an intent to release something at some point. But we knew that two years ago.

Fact remains, RTG has been underperforming like nobody's business so far, GPU did better when it still had the AMD tag, and it is a fact that AMD has separated RTG from the core business because of risk concerns for their successful Zen product. Read between the lines, that'll be all thanks :)

IF AMD is really pushing Navi as the next best thing, this can really go only way direction, and that is pushing Nvidia harder on Volta, resulting in Volta single-die GPUs battling it out with MCM solutions from AMD. So basically where AMD needs two, three or four dies, Nvidia bakes one to match its performance. I'm sure that'll help the margins alot. AMD literally has one year now to refine GCN to a point that it remains viable WITHOUT resorting to MCM. If they do not, well, say hi to stagnation and price inflated GPUs again.

Another vital issue arises, and that is tremendous amounts of work for driver teams and engineering too, because MCM is never going to work the same as blunt ol' Crossfire, it'll talk over Infinity Fabric, and it will be utilizing VRAM differently. So by then AMD has THREE radically different architectures in the marketplace to support one stack of products. Again, not the best example of efficiency.

It'll be another year of agony.
 
Last edited:

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
42,736 (6.69/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
Not soon enough for this process, amd will be behind yet again.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,996 (0.78/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ||| Intel Core i7-3930K
Motherboard ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR ||| Asus P9X79 WS
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S ||| Be Quiet Pure Rock
Memory Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz ||| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1333 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 3GB ||| MSI GTX 680 4GB
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB ||| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" ||| Eizo EV2416W 24"
Case Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2
Audio Device(s) Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus
Power Supply Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire XT
Software Ubuntu
So "AMD reportedly…" actually means Anthony Garreffa over at Tweaktown speculating, the source has nothing to do with AMD.

Have all of you forgotten how the news outlets spread the rumor about Vega launching last October?

AMD have said they hope to tape out Navi by end of 2017, usually products arrive one year after that. It took almost 13 months from tape out until Vega FE launched, about 14 months for the consumer product. Vega was a fairly minimal design improvement over Fiji, and was produced on a mature node. Navi will have more radical changes and be produced on a brand new node. GloFo 7nm is not planned to enter volume production until H2 2018, and takes another ~4 months from a wafer to a finished product.

Actually Vega is quite power efficient. If you look at GamersNexus, they did a video where they compared Vega to the Fury X and Clock for Clock Vega is significantly more power efficient. In fact I managed to get my hands on a Vega 56 to test this. I flashed the Vega 64 bios onto the card and lowered the voltage to 950mv and left everything else alone.
Operating at such low voltages will not give you a stable product.

I know, it puzzles me why all Ryzen CPUs are being heavily discounted at retail - their latest and greatest ever - with no successor in sight? Doesn't make a lot of sense. Please enlighten me as to why Ryzen is losing popularity so quickly.
Simply because Coffee Lake is a better choice.

Most likely AMD will have 12nm GloFo shrink versions for Vega. It's kind of official. :)
https://www.globalfoundries.com/new...-technology-for-high-performance-applications
"12nm" GloFo is just another refresh of "14nm", similar to TSMC "12nm" used by Nvidia for Volta.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,520 (3.27/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
Oh yes, the anti-AMD shill offered to build his imaginary nephew an AMD system. That's not even the funny part, the funny part is that you are making YOUR rig building decisions based on the bulling of school children.

"I know, it puzzles me why all Ryzen CPUs are being heavily discounted at retail "

:roll:

So many people fall for this pathetic attempt of troll bait. Good to see some don't.

On topic : if they find way to distribute the workload efficiently and most importantly make it so that to an API the GPU still appears as a single pool of resource , it will be a home run. With or without high clocks or GloFo's questionable nodes.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 13, 2016
Messages
3,354 (1.09/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ASRock X670E Taichi
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 Chromax
Memory 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 4090 Trio
Storage P5800X 1.6TB 4x 15.36TB Micron 9300 Pro 4x WD Black 8TB M.2
Display(s) Acer Predator XB3 27" 240 Hz
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) JDS Element IV, DCA Aeon II
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Titanium 850w
Mouse PMM P-305
Keyboard Wooting HE60
VR HMD Valve Index
Software Win 10
So "AMD reportedly…" actually means Anthony Garreffa over at Tweaktown speculating, the source has nothing to do with AMD.

Have all of you forgotten how the news outlets spread the rumor about Vega launching last October?

AMD have said they hope to tape out Navi by end of 2017, usually products arrive one year after that. It took almost 13 months from tape out until Vega FE launched, about 14 months for the consumer product. Vega was a fairly minimal design improvement over Fiji, and was produced on a mature node. Navi will have more radical changes and be produced on a brand new node. GloFo 7nm is not planned to enter volume production until H2 2018, and takes another ~4 months from a wafer to a finished product.


Operating at such low voltages will not give you a stable product.


Simply because Coffee Lake is a better choice.


"12nm" GloFo is just another refresh of "14nm", similar to TSMC "12nm" used by Nvidia for Volta.

"Operating at such low voltages will not give you a stable product."

And you would know because you've had it and tried? I stress tested for 8 hours and then gamed on it, it is stable contrary to your uneducated opinion.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2016
Messages
3,354 (1.09/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ASRock X670E Taichi
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 Chromax
Memory 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 4090 Trio
Storage P5800X 1.6TB 4x 15.36TB Micron 9300 Pro 4x WD Black 8TB M.2
Display(s) Acer Predator XB3 27" 240 Hz
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) JDS Element IV, DCA Aeon II
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Titanium 850w
Mouse PMM P-305
Keyboard Wooting HE60
VR HMD Valve Index
Software Win 10
No it's not, different CPU architectures often have different CU counts which is what leads to different IPC...

First, we are not talking about CPUs. Second, CPUs don't have CUs, as in compute units that GPUs have. The only CU a CPU has is a control unit, and that's singular not plural. You obvious have no idea about CPU architecture if you think that CPUs have a bunch of CUs like GPUs. Thrid, CPU IPC is much more complicated that you put it. In fact, most modern CPUs have eeked out extra performance through better branch prediction and cache improvements, to the contrary of your imaginary clusters of CUs on CPUs.
 
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
994 (0.18/day)
Location
Michigan
System Name Daves
Processor AMD Ryzen 3900x
Motherboard AsRock X570 Taichi
Cooling Enermax LIQMAX III 360
Memory 32 GiG Team Group B Die 3600
Video Card(s) Powercolor 5700 xt Red Devil
Storage Crucial MX 500 SSD and Intel P660 NVME 2TB for games
Display(s) Acer 144htz 27in. 2560x1440
Case Phanteks P600S
Audio Device(s) N/A
Power Supply Corsair RM 750
Mouse EVGA
Keyboard Corsair Strafe
Software Windows 10 Pro
Love AMD but all I hear is BLAH BLAH BLAH, believe it when I see it!
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
1,533 (0.39/day)
Location
Grunn
System Name Indis the Fair (cursed edition)
Processor 11900k 5.1/4.9 undervolted.
Motherboard MSI Z590 Unify-X
Cooling Heatkiller VI Pro, VPP755 V.3, XSPC TX360 slim radiator, 3xA12x25, 4x Arctic P14 case fans
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws V 2x16GB 4000 16-19-19 (b-die@3600 14-14-14 1.45v)
Video Card(s) EVGA 2080 Super Hybrid (T30-120 fan)
Storage 970EVO 1TB, 660p 1TB, WD Blue 3D 1TB, Sandisk Ultra 3D 2TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2546K, Dell P2417H
Case FD Define 7
Audio Device(s) DT770 Pro, Topping A50, Focusrite Scarlett 2i2, Røde VXLR+, Modmic 5
Power Supply Seasonic 860w Platinum
Mouse Razer Viper Mini, Odin Infinity mousepad
Keyboard GMMK Fullsize v2 (Boba U4Ts)
Software Win10 x64/Win7 x64/Ubuntu
First, we are not talking about CPUs. Second, CPUs don't have CUs, as in compute units that GPUs have. The only CU a CPU has is a control unit, and that's singular not plural. You obvious have no idea about CPU architecture if you think that CPUs have a bunch of CUs like GPUs. Thrid, CPU IPC is much more complicated that you put it. In fact, most modern CPUs have eeked out extra performance through better branch prediction and cache improvements, to the contrary of your imaginary clusters of CUs on CPUs.
CUs being a generic term for the different processors in a CPU core such as FPUs and ALUs which still have a big effect on architecture performance...
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,881 (0.84/day)
So "AMD reportedly…" actually means Anthony Garreffa over at Tweaktown speculating, the source has nothing to do with AMD.

Have all of you forgotten how the news outlets spread the rumor about Vega launching last October?

Well techsites tend to regurgitate what they think is news worthy even when it doesn't make sense just to get clicks

Source articles said.

TweakTown said:
Once again I have an exclusive story that AMD will have Navi ready to go sometime in July-August 2018, with a Navi-based professional card being launched at SIGGRAPH 2018. We're still waiting for AMD to launch Radeon Pro SSG, something they unveiled during SIGGRAPH 2017 that hasn't yet materialized. In the meantime, Radeon Technologies Group boss Raja Koduri has taken a sabbatical from the company until early-2018.

Not a story nor did they include one.

TweakTown said:
Navi will be made on the 7nm process, but other than that we don't know much.

Wait what happen to your exclusive?

The entire piece is speculation and TPU bite on it for what ever reason. Then we get this drawn out debate on something that's just speculative.

Sites win. Made you click and gain traffic...
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2016
Messages
3,354 (1.09/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ASRock X670E Taichi
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 Chromax
Memory 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 4090 Trio
Storage P5800X 1.6TB 4x 15.36TB Micron 9300 Pro 4x WD Black 8TB M.2
Display(s) Acer Predator XB3 27" 240 Hz
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) JDS Element IV, DCA Aeon II
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Titanium 850w
Mouse PMM P-305
Keyboard Wooting HE60
VR HMD Valve Index
Software Win 10
CUs being a generic term for the different processors in a CPU core such as FPUs and ALUs which still have a big effect on architecture performance...

Please point to a reference besides you that used "CU" as catch all for FPU and ALU. I took a computer architecture class and digital logic class in college and never before did I see anything in our studies of past or present architecture that uses the same terminology as you. CU is either a control unit, of which there is only one, or compute unit, of which refers specifically to graphics cards.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
1,533 (0.39/day)
Location
Grunn
System Name Indis the Fair (cursed edition)
Processor 11900k 5.1/4.9 undervolted.
Motherboard MSI Z590 Unify-X
Cooling Heatkiller VI Pro, VPP755 V.3, XSPC TX360 slim radiator, 3xA12x25, 4x Arctic P14 case fans
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws V 2x16GB 4000 16-19-19 (b-die@3600 14-14-14 1.45v)
Video Card(s) EVGA 2080 Super Hybrid (T30-120 fan)
Storage 970EVO 1TB, 660p 1TB, WD Blue 3D 1TB, Sandisk Ultra 3D 2TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2546K, Dell P2417H
Case FD Define 7
Audio Device(s) DT770 Pro, Topping A50, Focusrite Scarlett 2i2, Røde VXLR+, Modmic 5
Power Supply Seasonic 860w Platinum
Mouse Razer Viper Mini, Odin Infinity mousepad
Keyboard GMMK Fullsize v2 (Boba U4Ts)
Software Win10 x64/Win7 x64/Ubuntu
Please point to a reference besides you that used "CU" as catch all for FPU and ALU. I took a computer architecture class and digital logic class in college and never before did I see anything in our studies of past or present architecture that uses the same terminology as you. CU is either a control unit, of which there is only one, or compute unit, of which refers specifically to graphics cards.
CU in graphics cards typically refers to a SP FPU no?

Sorry for being so bad with the terms, but I think my point still stands. Radeon's chips, in particular Vega, is doing less work with more resources...
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,520 (3.27/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
A CU (talking about compute unit not control unit) is an abstract name which was given to stream processors to signify that they are capable of general purpose computing. In actual fact it doesn't really bear any other meaning or hardware requirement associated with it outside of that.

A stream processor was also also an abstract name given to a class of processors that rely heavily on data level parallelism.

Stop getting stuck in meaningless semantics.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
4,446 (1.42/day)
Location
Currently Norway
System Name Bro2
Processor Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Corsair h115i pro rgb
Memory 32GB G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14 @3800Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) Powercolor 6900 XT Red Devil 1.1v@2400Mhz
Storage M.2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD69 UHD / LG 27GN950
Case Fractal Design G
Audio Device(s) Realtec 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic 750W GOLD
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech slim
Software Windows 10 64 bit
A CU (talking about compute unit not control unit) is an abstract name which was given to stream processors to signify that they are capable of general purpose computing. In actual fact it doesn't really bear any other meaning or hardware requirement associated with it outside of that.

A stream processor was also also an abstract name given to a class of processors that rely heavily on data level parallelism.

Stop getting stuck in meaningless semantics.
I think that's what he meant. CU aka compute units is reserved for GPUs. CU for CPUs is control unit and there's only one in CPU.
You shouldn't be like that. It's a site where people talk. If somebody struggles it's good to straighten him up with information.
 
Joined
Aug 2, 2011
Messages
1,458 (0.30/day)
Processor Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E MPG Carbon Wifi
Cooling Custom loop, 2x360mm radiator,Lian Li UNI, EK XRes140,EK Velocity2
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill DDR5-6400 @ 6400MHz C32
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra OC Scanner core +750 mem
Storage MP600 Pro 2TB,960 EVO 1TB,XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB,Micron 1100 2TB,1.5TB Caviar Green
Display(s) Alienware AW3423DWF, Acer XB270HU
Case LianLi O11 Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) Logitech G-Pro X Wireless
Power Supply EVGA P3 1200W
Mouse Logitech G502X Lightspeed
Keyboard Logitech G512 Carbon w/ GX Brown
VR HMD HP Reverb G2 (V2)
Software Win 11
hello terrible performance scaling
has amd not learned that nobody is going to optimize for there stupid module approach

You realize that NVIDIA will be moving to an MCM approach after Volta as well, right? Jensen himself said that was the next move.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2017
Messages
123 (0.04/day)
Location
Italy
You realize that NVIDIA will be moving to an MCM approach after Volta as well, right? Jensen himself said that was the next move.

On top of that, Ryzen scales near 100%, and GPUS are modular in nature, no way this could not scale as much as well.
Even if the bridge will let software access to indipendent modules, DX12 are here for indipendent multiple processing.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,847 (0.81/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
You mean 2018, 10nm isn't going into (mass?) production this year & I mean full launch not paper announcements.

Intel has made it quite clear (e.g.) that they intend to start producing and shipping 10nm chips before the end of 2017. This may not be mass production, but considering the accelerated launch of Skylake-X/Kaby Lake-X and Coffee Lake in response to Zen, they are obviously taking AMD's resurgence seriously. Yes, it's been a long haul to get to 10nm, but Intel generally doesn't make statements that they can't back up - especially considering how important 10nm is going to be for them. So if they say they'll have 10nm chips by the end of this year, I believe them.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
2,508 (0.78/day)
MCM compared to SLI/CF it'll be very different because it'll be a standardized feature of the hardware and not a luxury after thought that only a select few opt to take advantage of utilizing. That difference alone will inherently coerce developers to pay closer attention to it than optimizing for a handful of niche configurations.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2017
Messages
123 (0.04/day)
Location
Italy
Intel has made it quite clear (e.g.) that they intend to start producing and shipping 10nm chips before the end of 2017. This may not be mass production, but considering the accelerated launch of Skylake-X/Kaby Lake-X and Coffee Lake in response to Zen, they are obviously taking AMD's resurgence seriously. Yes, it's been a long haul to get to 10nm, but Intel generally doesn't make statements that they can't back up - especially considering how important 10nm is going to be for them. So if they say they'll have 10nm chips by the end of this year, I believe them.

I believe that those 2017 chips were intended to be FPGA.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.87/day)
Intel has made it quite clear (e.g.) that they intend to start producing and shipping 10nm chips before the end of 2017. This may not be mass production, but considering the accelerated launch of Skylake-X/Kaby Lake-X and Coffee Lake in response to Zen, they are obviously taking AMD's resurgence seriously. Yes, it's been a long haul to get to 10nm, but Intel generally doesn't make statements that they can't back up - especially considering how important 10nm is going to be for them. So if they say they'll have 10nm chips by the end of this year, I believe them.

The thing is, as process matures, so does efficiency. Even on same node. Just look at Intel's 14nm in the beginning and now. Or how 28nm matured from the beginning of it's life till its very end with GPU's, on both, Fury X and GTX 900 series. Or even how bloody efficient latest gen 22nm Haswell-E CPU's still are even compared to 1st gen of 14nm Broadwell-E.
 
Joined
Sep 29, 2011
Messages
217 (0.04/day)
Location
Ottawa, Canada
System Name Current Rig
Processor Intel 12700K@5.1GHz
Motherboard MSI Pro Z790-P
Cooling Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer II 360mm
Memory 2x16GB DDR5-6000 G.Skill Trident Z RGB
Video Card(s) MSI Gaming X Trio 6800 16GB
Storage 1TB SSD
Case Cooler Master Storm Striker
Power Supply Antec True Power 750w
Keyboard IBM Model 'M"
Lol I love AMD. They the #1 machine that comes into my shop with problems. I love them because they make me money fixing them. HP, Gateway, Acer, Dell, Asus, Etc. I used to own AMD. I had 5 of them long time ago tweaking having funs fixing issues all the time. Then I noticed when I switch all to Intel machines My problems went away. Also my power bills dropped by 100 dollars a month. I have all Intel now some older than 15 years so Ya I perfer stable and allways works than having issues and allways having problems.

LOL, your fake story is even worse than the one about the kid being picked on because he was getting an AMD-powered gaming system. Don't you people ever learn? We're just not that stupid.

I have been building computers for people since the early 1990s. My first IBM-compatible was actually an AMD 386/40MHz, which was faster than the Intel 386/33MHz, and $60 cheaper. Guest which one I bought? With few variations, it's been the same DAMNED STORY ever since. AMD gives you more for your money. Their CPUs, with only a few varations, are just as fast for all intents and purposes. When you need benchmark software to show you you're hypothetically getting better performance with an Intel chip because you CAN'T FEEL IT yourself when you actually use the computer, that's telling you something you really need to be listening to.

I also actually game, and I have a Ryzen 7 1700 o'c'd to 3.8GHz and an R9 290 Radeon card, and they're both more than fast enough in every game I throw at them. I'm playing the very latest game, Wolfenstein II: New Colossus with this system, and it's buttery smooth. AMD CPU. AMD GPU. It's UTTER NONSENSE that you need Intel or an nVidia GPU to game really well. They charge more, but that's all. You're not getting anything for that price premium. End of story.

Intel has made it quite clear (e.g.) that they intend to start producing and shipping 10nm chips before the end of 2017. This may not be mass production, but considering the accelerated launch of Skylake-X/Kaby Lake-X and Coffee Lake in response to Zen, they are obviously taking AMD's resurgence seriously. Yes, it's been a long haul to get to 10nm, but Intel generally doesn't make statements that they can't back up - especially considering how important 10nm is going to be for them. So if they say they'll have 10nm chips by the end of this year, I believe them.

Intel has pushed 10nm to 2018. They said something they can't back up. It's official.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
2,508 (0.78/day)
I had better reliability and stability with AMD than Intel of the course of the last 15 years or so and owned a mixture of both. If it weren't for Intel's manufacturing advantage I probably wouldn't have owned any of their CPU's ironically.
 
Joined
Aug 2, 2011
Messages
1,458 (0.30/day)
Processor Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E MPG Carbon Wifi
Cooling Custom loop, 2x360mm radiator,Lian Li UNI, EK XRes140,EK Velocity2
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill DDR5-6400 @ 6400MHz C32
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra OC Scanner core +750 mem
Storage MP600 Pro 2TB,960 EVO 1TB,XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB,Micron 1100 2TB,1.5TB Caviar Green
Display(s) Alienware AW3423DWF, Acer XB270HU
Case LianLi O11 Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) Logitech G-Pro X Wireless
Power Supply EVGA P3 1200W
Mouse Logitech G502X Lightspeed
Keyboard Logitech G512 Carbon w/ GX Brown
VR HMD HP Reverb G2 (V2)
Software Win 11
Joined
Jan 13, 2018
Messages
6 (0.00/day)
Here's the bit everyone seems to overlook and/ or forget, pertaining to AMD. AMD does not compete. At least not for the enthusiast market. Their main objective is to offer a cost effective solution. Nvidia just makes their job harder by introducing something like the GTX 1060 which happens to rival, if not supersede, most of AMDs flagship cards(RX480/ 580) and at a lower price point.

Notice, Radeon products have not won a generation based on a shear power and performance level since the 1000XT and 2000XT series of cards, and going back before that. This is because Radeon is no longer ATI, but AMD and AMD has a completely different marketing method. ATI was of a competitive enthusiast card back in the day, but with 3DFX it was a tough battle. Nvidia, not terribly popular at the time, acquired 3DFX and their tech and ascended to glory. Still, ATI competed.

As far as CPU goes AMD has Never won on a power/ performance level, but has won CPU generations based on a price-to-performance level and only just recently done so once again with its Ryzen line of CPUs, since the days of the Phenom. Thread Ripper, like the Phenom IIs, doesn't quite rival or beat out Intel's upper end of CPUs(in this case the i9s), but gets us close at a better cost. This is why AMD is allowed to remain. They are not a threat to either Intel or Nvidia, but a pain in the a$$ to either company's midrange market, which is the majority. Once Thread Ripper is over and done with people will be trying to buy them all up and run them for the next 8 years, just like the Phenom X6 1100T, after people will pour over to the next more powerful of the Ryzen CPUs until those are gone, and everyone will speak of the Ryzen days, just as people do the Phenom days. AMD will then fade into unpopularity and will then again produce another memorable moment in another near decade. They've done this ever since they've been around. AMD Athlon - Thunderbird, a popular CPU at its time for cost-to -performance, as well as their unlocked nature(circa 2000), AMD wouldn't repeat this popularity again until the Phenoms roughly 8 years later...hmmm

The AMD's GPU line now echos their CPU market. AMD produces a kick-a$$ piece of silicon that nearly rivals what Intel and Nvidia are doing in their respective markets, but at a lower price point.
 
Last edited:

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
42,736 (6.69/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
580 was never flagship
 
Top