• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Reports Third Quarter 2017 Financial Results

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,294 (7.53/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
AMD (NASDAQ:AMD) today announced revenue for the third quarter of 2017 of $1.64 billion, operating income of $126 million and net income of $71 million, and diluted earnings per share of $0.07. On a non-GAAP(1) basis, operating income was $155 million, net income was $110 million, and diluted earnings per share was $0.10.

"Strong customer adoption of our new high-performance products drove significant revenue growth and improved financial results from a year ago," said Dr. Lisa Su, AMD president and CEO. "Our third quarter new product introductions and financial execution mark another important milestone as we establish AMD as a premier growth company in the technology industry."



Q3 2017 Results
  • Revenue was $1.64 billion, up 26 percent year-over-year, primarily driven by higher revenue in the Computing and Graphics segment (CG). Revenue was up 34 percent sequentially, driven by the Enterprise Embedded and Semi-Custom segment (EESC) revenue seasonality and higher revenue in CG. In the quarter, AMD closed a patent licensing transaction which positively impacted revenue in the segments.
  • On a GAAP basis, gross margin was 35 percent, up 30 percentage points year-over-year primarily due to a $340 million charge related to our GLOBALFOUNDRIES Wafer Supply Agreement (WSA) in the year ago period (WSA charge). In addition, the gross margin increase was primarily driven by the benefit from IP related revenue and a richer revenue mix from CG partially offset by costs associated with the WSA for certain wafers purchased at another foundry. Gross margin was up 2 percentage points sequentially primarily driven by the benefit from IP related revenue, partially offset by costs associated with the WSA for certain wafers purchased at another foundry. Operating income was $126 million compared to an operating loss of $293 million a year ago and operating income of $25 million in the prior quarter. Net income was $71 million compared to net losses of $406 million a year ago and $16 million in the prior quarter. Diluted earnings per share was $0.07 compared to losses per share of $0.50 a year ago and $0.02 in the prior quarter.
  • On a non-GAAP(1) basis, gross margin was 35 percent, up 4 percentage points year-over-year primarily driven by the benefit from IP related revenue and a richer revenue mix from CG, partially offset by costs associated with the WSA for certain wafers purchased at another foundry. Gross margin was up 2 percentage points sequentially primarily driven by the benefit from IP related revenue, partially offset by costs associated with the WSA for certain wafers purchased at another foundry. Operating income was $155 million compared to $70 million a year ago and $49 million in the prior quarter. Net income was $110 million compared to $27 million a year ago and $19 million in the prior quarter. Diluted earnings per share was $0.10 compared to $0.03 a year ago and $0.02 in the prior quarter.
  • Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities were $879 million at the end of the quarter, compared to $844 million in the prior quarter.
Quarterly Financial Segment Summary
  • Computing and Graphics segment revenue was $819 million, up 74 percent year-over-year primarily driven by strong sales of Radeon graphics and Ryzen desktop processors.
  • Client average selling price (ASP) increased significantly year-over-year, due to higher desktop processor ASP driven by Ryzen processor sales.
  • GPU ASP increased significantly year-over-year.
  • Operating income was $70 million, compared to an operating loss of $66 million a year ago. The year-over-year improvement was primarily driven by higher revenue.
  • Enterprise, Embedded and Semi-Custom segment revenue was $824 million, approximately flat year-over-year primarily driven by lower semi-custom SoC sales, mostly offset by IP related and EPYC processor revenue.
  • Operating income was $84 million, compared to $136 million a year ago. The year-over-year decrease was primarily due to higher costs partially offset by the net benefit of IP related items.
  • All Other operating loss was $28 million compared with an operating loss of $363 million a year ago. The year-over-year difference in operating loss was primarily related to the WSA charge in the year ago period.
Q3 2017 Highlights
  • AMD continued driving innovation and competition into the consumer and commercial PC markets with new Ryzen processors:
  • Ryzen Threadripper processors launched for the High End Desktop and workstation markets. Available in 8-, 16- and 12-core variants, Threadripper processors are available from over 90 retailers, OEMs, and system integrators worldwide, including in the Alienware Area-51 Threadripper Edition gaming PC, BOXX APEXX 4 6301 and NextComputing Edge TR workstations.
  • Ryzen 3 CPUs offer exceptional responsiveness and performance at mainstream pricing, completing the Ryzen mainstream desktop lineup.
  • Ryzen PRO desktop solutions have received broad support from top global commercial PC suppliers, including Dell, HP, and Lenovo.
  • AMD expanded its graphics offerings with new consumer, professional, and embedded graphics solutions:
  • Launched the "Vega" architecture-based Radeon RX Vega family of GPUs, marking a return to the enthusiast-class gaming segment. These new "Vega" architecture-based GPUscombine cutting-edge capabilities with 8GB of HBM2 memory to deliver up to 13.7 TFLOPS of peak performance.
  • Launched the Radeon Pro WX 9100 professional graphics card, delivering up to 12.3 TFLOPS of peak single precision compute performance.
  • Launched the Embedded Radeon E9170 Series GPU, which delivers up to 3X the performance-per-watt over previous generations, and is targeted at digital casino games, thin clients, medical displays, digital and retail signage, and industrial systems(2).
  • With new announcements from Amazon Web Services (AWS), and Tencent, AMD enterprise solutions have now been chosen by five of the "Super 7" datacenter and cloud services companies. Previously announced collaborations include Alibaba, Baidu and Microsoft Azure.
  • Amazon Web Services selected AMD Radeon Pro MxGPU technology for the new Graphics Design instance type on Amazon AppStream 2.0, which allows users to run graphics-accelerated applications at a fraction of the cost of using graphics workstations.
  • Tencent announced plans to use AMD EPYC 7000 series server processors in their datacenters.
  • Atari disclosed that a customized AMD processor featuring Radeon graphics technology will power the upcoming Ataribox game console, which is targeted for global launch in spring 2018.
Current Outlook
AMD's outlook statements are based on current expectations. The following statements are forward-looking, and actual results could differ materially depending on market conditions and the factors set forth under "Cautionary Statement" below.

For the fourth quarter of 2017, AMD expects revenue to decrease approximately 15 percent sequentially, plus or minus 3 percent. The midpoint of guidance would result in fourth quarter 2017 revenue increasing approximately 26 percent year-over-year. AMD now expects annual 2017 revenue to increase by greater than 20 percent, compared to prior guidance of mid-to-high teens percentage.

For additional details regarding AMD's results and outlook please see the CFO commentary posted at quarterlyearnings.amd.com.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Messages
1,491 (0.20/day)
Location
66 feet from the ground
System Name 2nd AMD puppy
Processor FX-8350 vishera
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper TX2
Memory 16 Gb DDR3:8GB Kingston HyperX Beast + 8Gb G.Skill Sniper(by courtesy of tabascosauz &TPU)
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+;1450/2000 Mhz
Storage SSD :840 pro 128 Gb;Iridium pro 240Gb ; HDD 2xWD-1Tb
Display(s) Benq XL2730Z 144 Hz freesync
Case NZXT 820 PHANTOM
Audio Device(s) Audigy SE with Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Riotoro Enigma G2 850W
Mouse Razer copperhead / Gamdias zeus (by courtesy of sneekypeet & TPU)
Keyboard MS Sidewinder x4
Software win10 64bit ltsc
Benchmark Scores irrelevant for me
the figures reflect exactly the used low margin in order to battle with competitors
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,563 (1.77/day)
the figures reflect exactly the used low margin in order to battle with competitors
What are you talking about?
Client average selling price (ASP) increased significantly year-over-year, due to higher desktop processor ASP driven by Ryzen processor sales.
GPU ASP increased significantly year-over-year.
Their gross & net margins increased YoY & QoQ as well, IIRC besides what you said only applies to embedded & semi custom solutions like consoles, there of course they have no competition!
 
Joined
Apr 14, 2016
Messages
288 (0.09/day)
What are you talking about?Their gross & net margins increased YoY & QoQ as well, IIRC besides what you said only applies to embedded & semi custom solutions like consoles, there of course they have no competition!

Ofc it increased, but still very low margin.

Here in Brazil Ryzen 7 1700 is even cheaper than USA and EUROPE, this never ever happened in the history of my country.

They are trying to gain market based on prices, but shareholders are not very happy, if you see AMD stock decreased after the financial results.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,563 (1.77/day)
Ofc it increased, but still very low margin.

Here in Brazil Ryzen 7 1700 is even cheaper than USA and EUROPE, this never ever happened in the history of my country.
It's low margin as compared to Intel, for obvious reasons, but compared to any of the bulldozer derivatives before this, Ryzen's selling at a higher ASP & probably better margin as well. TR & especially EPYC will increase their gross/net margins even further, though it'll take probably a year or half to get reflected in results.

You have to remember AMD is still investing heavily in R&D, as they should, but the fruits of which sometimes take years.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 14, 2016
Messages
288 (0.09/day)
It's low margin as compared to Intel, for obvious reasons, but compared to any of the bulldozer derivatives before this, Ryzen is till selling at a higher ASP & probably better margin as well. TR & especially EPYC will increase their gross/net margins even further, though it'll take probably a year or half to get reflected in results.

You have to remember AMD is still investing heavily in R&D, as they should, but the fruits of which sometimes take years.

Bulldozer is crap and it isnt a chip that is good for sales, so ofc its increased.

https://camelcamelcamel.com/AMD-FX-8370-Octa-core-Processor-FD8370FRHKHBX/product/B01798X7D2

Look at this, feb 2016 $239, this CPU should be $320 CPU, but if AMD chose this price the CPU wont sale at all. Cause with $320 you could buy an i7.

So yes, they have to live in the margin.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2017
Messages
688 (0.24/day)
Bulldozer is crap and it isnt a chip that is good for sales, so ofc its increased.

https://camelcamelcamel.com/AMD-FX-8370-Octa-core-Processor-FD8370FRHKHBX/product/B01798X7D2

Look at this, feb 2016 $239, this CPU should be $320 CPU, but if AMD chose this price the CPU wont sale at all. Cause with $320 you could buy an i7.

So yes, they have to live in the margin.
I can't get to your point. The MSRP of 8370 was 194$...

Anyway, very nice results. It just shows how many Ryzens were sold. A lot. Much better value for the money compared to Intel. That's why (or at least was one reason) AMD (ATI) cards sold better then nowadays: they had better value for the money in most GPU categories (nowadays it's only competitive in mid range). It's every users' interest to get better, so we will see better products on both sides, in both the CPU and GPU sections. And X1X is just coming, which should sell much better than PS4 Pro. Ryzen update may come in early 2018. Promising times for AMD.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
530 (0.16/day)
System Name My Addiction
Processor AMD Ryzen 7950X3D
Motherboard ASRock B650E PG-ITX WiFi
Cooling Alphacool Core Ocean T38 AIO 240mm
Memory G.Skill 32GB 6000MHz
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 7900XTX
Storage Some SSDs
Display(s) 42" Samsung TV + 22" Dell monitor vertically
Case Lian Li A4-H2O
Audio Device(s) Denon + Bose
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Logitech
Keyboard Glorious
VR HMD None
Software Win 10
Benchmark Scores None taken
Are you sure?

[sarcasm]Of course! As long as it doesn't beat the competitor's best product for half the price, AMD sucks.[/sarcasm]
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,503 (3.27/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
Are you sure?

That chart looks strange af , RX 580 being 40% faster than an RX 480 ? What happened , it gained 1024 extra shaders overnight or something ?
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2017
Messages
688 (0.24/day)
That chart looks strange af , RX 580 being 40% faster than an RX 480 ? What happened , it gained 1024 extra shaders overnight or something ?
But they are true. Both Guru3d and GamersNexus experienced the same. If you check the new Crimson driver notes, it says 40-50% boost for Vega56 and RX580 in 1440P. It is just what happened in both benchmarks. In FHD, there was only 12% difference bw. 480 and 580 which is reasonable. But that 60% difference in 1440P is shocking, considering both cards are the same.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
1,162 (0.20/day)
Location
I live in Norway
Processor R9 5800x3d | R7 3900X | 4800H | 2x Xeon gold 6142
Motherboard Asrock X570M | AB350M Pro 4 | Asus Tuf A15
Cooling Air | Air | duh laptop
Memory 64gb G.skill SniperX @3600 CL16 | 128gb | 32GB | 192gb
Video Card(s) RTX 4080 |Quadro P5000 | RTX2060M
Storage Many drives
Display(s) AW3423dwf.
Case Jonsbo D41
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse g502 Lightspeed
Keyboard G913 tkl
Software win11, proxmox
vega isn't horrible.
It isn't great - it's ok.
GTX1080 is a great card at a bad pricepoint, it is too expensive.

Nvidia should launch 1070ti at 1070 -10 usd price, 1070 at 1060 6gb + 20-35 usd, 1080 at -20 usd. and we're talking a lineup worth praising.

but at the moment the only reasonably priced nvidia cards at 1060 3gb,1050 and 1080ti.

Their cards are great but prices are too high, the 2015 GTX9 series performance per dollar isn't changed that much and shows rather bad value but we have mining which distorts everything.

I'm happy with a 450 usd(value conversion - tax etc from europe) vega 64 :)
 

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
14,018 (2.34/day)
Location
Louisiana
Processor Core i9-9900k
Motherboard ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6
Cooling All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax ETS-T50 Black CPU cooler
Memory 32GB (2x16) Mushkin Redline DDR-4 3200
Video Card(s) ASUS RTX 4070 Ti Super OC 16GB
Storage 1x 1TB MX500 (OS); 2x 6TB WD Black; 1x 2TB MX500; 1x 1TB BX500 SSD; 1x 6TB WD Blue storage (eSATA)
Display(s) Infievo 27" 165Hz @ 2560 x 1440
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black -windowed
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX-1000 Gold
Mouse Coolermaster Sentinel III (large palm grip!)
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)
:rolleyes: So, AMD finally posts a profit, and we still have "jokesters" in the beginning of thread that find a way to put them down for that. I honestly just do not understand the negativity. :kookoo:

AMD doing well is good for all, regardless which brand some people seem to worship.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2017
Messages
688 (0.24/day)
Shock Horror!!!

Game developed on consoles with AMD GPU architecture runs better on PC's with AMD GPU architecture!

Shock Horror!!!
And a game shown as an NV supported title at Gamescom. lol... Wake up.

BTW, every multi platform title is developed on consoles with AMD GPU architecture... :D
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
3,954 (0.90/day)
System Name Skunkworks 3.0
Processor 5800x3d
Motherboard x570 unify
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A
Memory 32GB 3600 mhz
Video Card(s) asrock 6800xt challenger D
Storage Sabarent rocket 4.0 2TB, MX 500 2TB
Display(s) Asus 1440p144 27"
Case Old arse cooler master 932
Power Supply Corsair 1200w platinum
Mouse *squeak*
Keyboard Some old office thing
Software Manjaro
And a game shown as an NV supported title at Gamescom. lol... Wake up.

BTW, every multi platform title is developed on consoles with AMD GPU architecture... :D
Ok, woken up. You posted one entire game that is better on AMD! OMGLOLNVDED!!11!!1 HOW COULD I BE SO BLINDED!

:laugh::roll::laugh:

Grow up. One game does not a good GPU make. AMD drug their feet far too long on vega, and even if vega finally catches pascal, volta will be ready to release by then. So they were good in destiny 2. So what? I could post a game with vega 64 not matching the 1070 and say nvidia still cant touch 1080 performance, and it would be just as valid as your claim.

Overall, VEGA fails to match the performance of 18 month old pascals overall in game performance. And pulls significantly more power/creates far more heat, while costing more then the nvidia parts ($650 for vega 64 VS $550 for 1080, yeah great deal there bud :rolleyes:) And are often only available as part of a "bundle" to boot.

AMD dropped the ball on vega. The time has passed, the major sales window for huge vega shipments sailed already. Hopefully AMD can get NAVI right with all the money from ryzen.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2017
Messages
688 (0.24/day)
Ok, woken up. You posted one entire game that is better on AMD! OMGLOLNVDED!!11!!1 HOW COULD I BE SO BLINDED!

:laugh::roll::laugh:

Grow up. One game does not a good GPU make. AMD drug their feet far too long on vega, and even if vega finally catches pascal, volta will be ready to release by then. So they were good in destiny 2. So what? I could post a game with vega 64 not matching the 1070 and say nvidia still cant touch 1080 performance, and it would be just as valid as your claim.

Overall, VEGA fails to match the performance of 18 month old pascals overall in game performance. And pulls significantly more power/creates far more heat, while costing more then the nvidia parts ($650 for vega 64 VS $550 for 1080, yeah great deal there bud :rolleyes:) And are often only available as part of a "bundle" to boot.

AMD dropped the ball on vega. The time has passed, the major sales window for huge vega shipments sailed already. Hopefully AMD can get NAVI right with all the money from ryzen.

Have you checked the last 4 AAA titles? Forza 7, Shadow of War, Evil Within 2, Destiny 2. In every single title, the Vega56 outperforms the 1070 by at least 10%. In Evil Within 2 and Destiny 2, it even catches the 1080... I'm not talking about Destiny 2 only. And Wolfenstein II, Quake Champions are yet to come this year. Only Assassin's Creed shall run better on 1070, I have no idea about NFS.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
3,954 (0.90/day)
System Name Skunkworks 3.0
Processor 5800x3d
Motherboard x570 unify
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A
Memory 32GB 3600 mhz
Video Card(s) asrock 6800xt challenger D
Storage Sabarent rocket 4.0 2TB, MX 500 2TB
Display(s) Asus 1440p144 27"
Case Old arse cooler master 932
Power Supply Corsair 1200w platinum
Mouse *squeak*
Keyboard Some old office thing
Software Manjaro
Have you checked the last 4 AAA titles? Forza 7, Shadow of War, Evil Within 2, Destiny 2. In every single title, the Vega56 outperforms the 1070 by at least 10%. In Evil Within 2 and Destiny 2, it even catches the 1080... I'm not talking about Destiny 2 only. And Wolfenstein II, Quake Champions are yet to come this year. Only Assassin's Creed shall run better on 1070, I have no idea about NFS.
You should have posted those graphs then. By only posting a single graph, you seemed to be saying that AMD was totally better because of just one game.

And will admit that vega 56 is looking a lot better. Just last week, the only available models were going for $550+, compared to $450 for 1070s. It seems price and availability changed dramatically at some point.

Vega 64 still isnt very competitive with the 1080, IMO. Still too expensive for proper performing ones. and heck, we STILL dont have any custom VEGA cards, and custom coolers would help a lot with 64's heat problem.

I still stand by my statement that AMD bungled the launch hard, and missed the boat on sales due to their issues.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2017
Messages
688 (0.24/day)
You should have posted those graphs then.

I just didn't want to spam so many results. You can check Shadow of War on TPUp or https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pag..._graphics_performance_benchmark_review,5.html

Forza 7 benchmarks are here: https://www.computerbase.de/2017-09/forza-7-benchmark/
Evil Within 2: http://www.pcgameshardware.de/The-E...vil-Within-2-Techink-Test-Benchmarks-1241032/

Vega 64 is not so competitive against the 1080. However, in the UK, the Vega64 is cheaper than the cheapest 1080. They perform the same right now, ofc the Vega64 has much more hunger for power in default. But the Vega56 beats the 1070 by nearly 10 in 1440P.

And I forgot to mention Battlefront 2, which is expected to run better on AMD.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 11, 2016
Messages
261 (0.08/day)
This is the real issue (from Bloomberg):

"AMD reported a gross margin, or percentage of sales remaining after deducting the cost of production, of 35 percent. That compares with more than 60 percent at Intel and 58 percent at graphics-chip maker Nvidia Corp."

On the plus side, it was the first reported profit in 5 quarters. With the cryptocurrency insanity this year I'd kind of hoped for more from AMD. They also predicted lower numbers for Q4, which is concerning for the holidays. I'm amazed AMD has hung in there as well as they have with a David & Goliath R+D situation with Intel and Nvidia.
 

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
19,668 (2.86/day)
Location
w
System Name Black MC in Tokyo
Processor Ryzen 5 7600
Motherboard MSI X670E Gaming Plus Wifi
Cooling Be Quiet! Pure Rock 2
Memory 2 x 16GB Corsair Vengeance @ 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) XFX 6950XT Speedster MERC 319
Storage Kingston KC3000 1TB | WD Black SN750 2TB |WD Blue 1TB x 2 | Toshiba P300 2TB | Seagate Expansion 8TB
Display(s) Samsung U32J590U 4K + BenQ GL2450HT 1080p
Case Fractal Design Define R4
Audio Device(s) Plantronics 5220, Nektar SE61 keyboard
Power Supply Corsair RM850x v3
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Dell SK3205
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Rimworld 4K ready!
GTX1080 is a great card at a bad pricepoint, it is too expensive.

Wouldn't that make it a bad card? I mean a GTX 1080ti is awesome, up to the point it costs too much.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
1,162 (0.20/day)
Location
I live in Norway
Processor R9 5800x3d | R7 3900X | 4800H | 2x Xeon gold 6142
Motherboard Asrock X570M | AB350M Pro 4 | Asus Tuf A15
Cooling Air | Air | duh laptop
Memory 64gb G.skill SniperX @3600 CL16 | 128gb | 32GB | 192gb
Video Card(s) RTX 4080 |Quadro P5000 | RTX2060M
Storage Many drives
Display(s) AW3423dwf.
Case Jonsbo D41
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse g502 Lightspeed
Keyboard G913 tkl
Software win11, proxmox
Wouldn't that make it a bad card? I mean a GTX 1080ti is awesome, up to the point it costs too much.
it's simply too expensive?
it could be a 1060 price without any concerns for nvidia when it comes to making money, it could be absolutely awesome PRODUCT while the card is Great ;)
Card uses little power, perfect balance of performance vs watt.

Drop the price 20-40 bucks and it'd be a no brainer and would make a Vega from a decent card to a bad card :)
 

Fx

Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
1,332 (0.23/day)
Location
Portland, OR
Processor Ryzen 2600x
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix X470-F Gaming
Cooling Noctua
Memory G.SKILL Flare X Series 16GB DDR4 3466
Video Card(s) EVGA 980ti FTW
Storage (OS)Samsung 950 Pro (512GB), (Data) WD Reds
Display(s) 24" Dell UltraSharp U2412M
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser GAME ONE
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 650 P2
Mouse Mionix Castor
Keyboard Deck Hassium Pro
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Sweeet! This day has been a long time coming. Congratulations to AMD!
 
Top