Post your Cinebench R23 Score

[Melvis]

Better then I was expecting lol

 

[er557]

I reckon for dual socket the score should be higher than this, but it is not overclocked in any way except all core turbo hack, NUMA is enabled as the performance is more consistent, default clocks 2.3ghz--> 3.5ghz all core turbo

 

[RealNeil]

Amazing,......

 

[kniaugaudiskis]

@er557 Very nice! May I ask what efi driver are you running to allow the vcore of 1.02 volts with x35 multi? As for myself, I'm running the E5-2696V3 + ASUS X99 Deluxe II + 0x39 microcode efi driver with a powercut and -60mV on the vcore which gives me 3.3GHz on all cores. With +3MHz BLCK OC I'm getting 3.4GHz on all cores, my vcore sits at around 0.939v, however, I'm fully stable. If I load -90mV efi driver, it gives me 3.4GHz (3.5GHz with BLCK OC) but my vcore drops further down to around 0.92v and the CPU becomes unstable. Is there anything I can do to increase the vcore at least a little bit? I haven't touched LLC though.

 

[jboydgolfer]

it took atleast 5 minutes to run this nightmare
i couldnt Deal with waiting for the "prepare" for the damn GPU run the saddest part......win7 hasnt changed which means this Lappy was NEVER any faster than this.. it takes an EASY 2-3 minutes to SHUTDOWN

 

[Melvis]

it took atleast 5 minutes to run this nightmare
i couldnt Deal with waiting for the "prepare" for the damn GPU run the saddest part......win7 hasnt changed which means this Lappy was NEVER any faster than this.. it takes an EASY 2-3 minutes to SHUTDOWN

Im surprised the Turion Ultra beat it since there both clocked at the same speed lol and I hear your pain I could eat dinner as it did this benchmark

 

[jboydgolfer]

It's crazy too ,because the laptop (even though it's ancient) is in almost 100% brand new condition. if you were to just pick it up ,& open it you'd be like "oh here's a nice laptop"........wrong!!

 

[Melvis]

It's crazy too ,because the laptop (even though it's ancient) is in almost 100% brand new condition. if you were to just pick it up ,& open it you'd be like "oh here's a nice laptop"........wrong!!

Hahaha thats crazy as this laptop the CQ60 is the same its like brand new as well So I just had to keep it and max it out lol (Turion Ultra ZM-87 incoming)

I will do a quick thread on this machine in the near future

 

[Ruru]

Suicide-run about right after I got my 7600K.

 

[FireFox]

 

[er557]

@er557 Very nice! May I ask what efi driver are you running to allow the vcore of 1.02 volts with x35 multi? As for myself, I'm running the E5-2696V3 + ASUS X99 Deluxe II + 0x39 microcode efi driver with a powercut and -60mV on the vcore which gives me 3.3GHz on all cores. With +3MHz BLCK OC I'm getting 3.4GHz on all cores, my vcore sits at around 0.939v, however, I'm fully stable. If I load -90mV efi driver, it gives me 3.4GHz (3.5GHz with BLCK OC) but my vcore drops further down to around 0.92v and the CPU becomes unstable. Is there anything I can do to increase the vcore at least a little bit? I haven't touched LLC though.

I use the randir v3x2_50_vcc_39.efi, which is both very stable and both uses the tdp unlock, and prevents throttling. IMHO, your result is very good as it is, I wouldn't tweak it further if you're stable, just enjoy the cpu. You may check in hwinfo sensors page if any throttling occurs with tdp or electric while stress testing, as most other efi drivers don't manage to break tdp limitation. I tried other efi drivers like -70vcc, and they worked with cinebench and cpuz for a few seconds, but they failed to break tdp in the long run, also were less stable. Of course, you should make sure the chip is properly cooled if you gonna push the power envelope . As to voltages, I never messed with them, they are usually automatic, and the board I'm using being not adjustable for bclk and vcore, it is enough boost as it is. I also load the 3A ucode in windows, more recent. Hope this helps

 

[DR4G00N]

 

[natr0n]

 

[DR4G00N]

Bit of a better score with some more tuning plus Win 7. Can't get the memory to run faster than 3200 on this board though.

 

[Tomgang]

I finally broke the 1100 barrier. So its now 1103 for my old I7 980X @ 4.77 GHz on air cooling.

 

[RealNeil]

Finally got my 10 core i9-7900X built. I haven't tweaked anything yet, but it's looking promising.

 

[FireFox]

I am concerned about temperatures.

 

[RealNeil]

I am concerned about temperatures.

On your machine?

 

[FireFox]

On your machine?

Of course not on mine, but on your.

 

[RealNeil]

My PSU is outputting more heat than the CPU

 

[Johan45]

On your machine?

I ran into something like that. You might be obervolting the CPU and undervolting the VCCIN. IMy benches wouldn't crash not even XTU but my scores were way low. I found that at that speed with good mems and cache I needed about 2.0V for VCCIN

 

[jboydgolfer]

View attachment 93943

Those are impressive scores for an i3. I own a couple of the 4170 i3's, and I have always said they are great multitasking/gaming CPUs & amazing chips price/performance wise. My 4790 only beat it by a couple hundred points or less .....thats a sweet chip youve got.

 

[flmatter]

Here is mine from m new laptop.....

 

[FireFox]

My PSU is outputting more heat than the CPU

In any case when you solve that i would like to see your temperatures.

 

[DR4G00N]

Those are impressive scores for an i3. I own a couple of the 4170 i3's, and I have always said they are great multitasking/gaming CPUs & amazing chips price/performance wise. My 4790 only beat it by a couple hundred points or less .....thats a sweet chip youve got.

These i3's are really not too bad performance wise for the price, especially for the locked ones.

This 7350K in particular is a Caseking 5GHz @ 1.34V 24/7 binned chip. Should be able to post up some better scores soon, 4000 12-12-12 mems with 5GHz+ Uncore should help a lot.