FINAL FANTASY XV Benchmark released

[Antykain]

i7 4790k @ Stock clocks with a Gigabyte GTX 1080, also at stock clocks.

Have this pre-ordered and played the Xbox One version quite a bit.. but never finished the main story yet. Maybe I will with the PC version coming..

 

[Melvis]

Not really, I mean yea, you can still game on it but it shows that even AMD's and Intel's "true" quad cores still out perform it 95% of the time, the fact it is close to the i5 2600k is probably testiment to show how much it has improved/matured over the years as FX could not compete with sandybridge in most things including games, but both fall behind quite a lot when it comes to being CPU limited, that said of course you can still game with one in 2018 as you still can on a 2500k and x58, though there is a noticable performance gap if you are bothered about running say 90fps compared to 60fps, either way it's still very playable imo so yea, they're still capable and relevant.

Your statement is kinda funny, at first you disagree but then later you agree kinda contradictory? (Not having a go at you by the way) Anyway ill see about running this benchmark

Stock as a rock on W7. SLI doesnt work well on this benchmark at all.

 

[TheHunter]

720p cpu bottleneck test @ 4.7ghz, gpu factory 1420Mhz.

Standard


High


Not so bad, but there is some, min was ~ 116fps or so by standard test..


1080P & max gpu OC 1463-1469MHz for this GM200 chip

standard


High



4k @ High, gpu 1420Mhz

 

[Zyll Goliat]

Some weird(Nvidia Hair-works) issues with this benchmark.....Is the benchmark rigged to works better on Nvidia cards?
Apparently Nvidia Hair-works is always on and seems to be hurting performance for no apparent gain, aside from some grass detail and in one location some hair detail even if you are unable to see that on your screen.....It´s hurting Nvidia cards also BUT less then the AMD GPU´s that struggle way more when hair works is ON and in this case there is no option to tuned off and from some reason your GPU will render"hair" that you even not seeing anywhere on the scene...

 

[Melvis]

My gaming laptop with a GTX 960m

 

[Vayra86]

Took another shot at it, this time with GPU pushed to the edge

Not too shabby I'd say

 

[basco]

Mister @TheHunter could ya tell me what gpu-memory frenzy is on your 980ti plz.
it seems this bench likes high gpu-ram frenzy-300 points from 200mhz overclock
TiA

maybe others with diff graphiccards have interest in gpu-memory tests.

 

[EzioAs]

About what I'd expect

 

[Vya Domus]

Turns out the demo is riddled with GameWorks effects driving performance into the ground on the highest preset.

Man do I hate Nvidia for creating this abomination that GameWorks is. I wonder how does Nvidia manage to bribe all these developers to let them shit on their game.

 

[dj-electric]

My old GTX 780 Ti still has some juice in it

 

[TheHunter]

Mister @TheHunter could ya tell me what gpu-memory frenzy is on your 980ti plz.
it seems this bench likes high gpu-ram frenzy-300 points from 200mhz overclock
TiA

maybe others with diff graphiccards have interest in gpu-memory tests.

Its minimal, my vram OC bad,.. its bios flashed @ 3550MHz.


EDIT:
Ok I tired my max gpu OC 1470 and vram at 3650MHZ > 351GB/s and actually got worse score. 7105, before 7195..
But I also enabled gamebar game mode and had msi ab visible, but doubt it would affect so much.. So dunno, I think gpu freq. still matter the most here.

 

[FreedomEclipse]

 

[[crs]]

Not Bad, CPU is overclocked to only 4000MHz and the GPU is stock.

 

[Melvis]

My mate ran his newish gaming rig which was a prebuilt Acer Predator or something thats running a i7-7700, 16GB RAM and a GTX 1060 6GB and he scored 4045 High Quality. (Latest drivers)

This is what my Rig scored, Im very impressed with my score compared to his! Keeping up with new gen very well!

 

[TheHunter]

My best score 7021 @ Stock 1405MHz;
cpu 4.7GHz [1.287v]/cache 4.2GHz [+0.060 offset]

 

[Athlonite]

better than before with Ye Old FX8320 + RX580