• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA Sneaks Less Powerful GeForce MX150 Variant Into Ultrabooks

Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
184 (0.04/day)
Location
Estonia
System Name Steamy
Processor Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard Asrock AB350M-Pro4
Cooling Wraith Prism
Memory 2x8GB HX429C15PB3AK2/16
Video Card(s) R9 290X WC
Storage 960Evo 500GB nvme
Case Fractal Design Define Mini C
Power Supply Seasonic SS-660XP2
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores http://hwbot.org/user/kinski/ http://valid.x86.fr/qfxqhj https://goo.gl/uWkw7n
N17S-G1-A1 // 1468 - 1531 MHz // 25 Watt TDP
N17S-LG-A1 // 936 - 1037 MHz // 10 Watt TDP

If it was me on the naming board at Nvidia it'd be MX150 and MX150LV :)

edit: or perhaps MX150 Max-Q, just to follow the current schema.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,479 (3.27/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
As we debated with 580 vs 480, different clocks does not a new gpu make.

No one said it's a new GPU , we are saying it's a different GPU. Clock speed is enough to differentiate two products.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
1,793 (0.46/day)
This is why Intel and Via GPUs are the best, they don't rename/weaken anything.
#notmydedicatedgpu

Not really, intel cpus has configurable TDP too. For the matter though, how many of them are used for gaming anyway. MX150 is not marketed as gaming gpu(At least not by nvidia, and btw that 4x times better is for photo and video editing. So probably faster because of nvenc, which does not depend on gpu clock). Granted they should be more transparent about this, like making clear that tdp is configurable and performance will be affected. And yeah best way is to make it clear by naming. But at least they are both gp108, not like they used to be wholly different generation chips with same name on low end.

Edit. Ahh there's 4x for gaming on specs page. Overall very vague specs for the card.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,566 (6.04/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
System Name Tiny the White Yeti
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling CPU: Thermalright Peerless Assassin / Case: Phanteks T30-120 x3
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
VR HMD HD 420 - Green Edition ;)
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
N17S-G1-A1 // 1468 - 1531 MHz // 25 Watt TDP
N17S-LG-A1 // 936 - 1037 MHz // 10 Watt TDP

If it was me on the naming board at Nvidia it'd be MX150 and MX150LV :)

edit: or perhaps MX150 Max-Q, just to follow the current schema.

See, there IS a differentiation, its not like one MX150 clocks down 'only due to thermals'. This really does stink.
 
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
184 (0.04/day)
Location
Estonia
System Name Steamy
Processor Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard Asrock AB350M-Pro4
Cooling Wraith Prism
Memory 2x8GB HX429C15PB3AK2/16
Video Card(s) R9 290X WC
Storage 960Evo 500GB nvme
Case Fractal Design Define Mini C
Power Supply Seasonic SS-660XP2
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores http://hwbot.org/user/kinski/ http://valid.x86.fr/qfxqhj https://goo.gl/uWkw7n
Anandtech has a writeup on this, so GP108 and GP108M are differentiated by Nvidia. Looks like OEMs f*ckup, perhaps, or atleast engineers and marketing not being on the same page, again.

Im now leaning towards Nvidia forcing them to add Max-Q to GPU description.

https://www.anandtech.com/show/12565/nvidia-silently-rolls-out-slower-mx150-for-ultrabooks

Further investigation on our part does reveal that there is a documented understanding that they are different parts, at least from an OEM perspective. By way of the official Ubuntu Certified hardware database, PCI ID ‘1D10’ is documented as the ‘GP108’ MX150 variant of the ThinkPad T480, while ‘1D12’ is recorded as the ‘GP108M’ variant of the ThinkPad T480s. In this case, although ‘GP108’ and ‘GP108M’ may not be NVIDIA’s own terminology, the Ubuntu Certified process involves OEMs directly working with Canonical to test their hardware. Canonical’s differentiation strongly implies that the OEMs are aware of MX150 variant.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
11,878 (2.20/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060
Storage Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter
Case Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
Anandtech has a writeup on this, so GP108 and GP108M are differentiated by Nvidia. Looks like OEMs f*ckup, perhaps, or atleast engineers and marketing not being on the same page, again.

Im now leaning towards Nvidia forcing them to add Max-Q to GPU description.

https://www.anandtech.com/show/12565/nvidia-silently-rolls-out-slower-mx150-for-ultrabooks

Further investigation on our part does reveal that there is a documented understanding that they are different parts, at least from an OEM perspective. By way of the official Ubuntu Certified hardware database, PCI ID ‘1D10’ is documented as the ‘GP108’ MX150 variant of the ThinkPad T480, while ‘1D12’ is recorded as the ‘GP108M’ variant of the ThinkPad T480s. In this case, although ‘GP108’ and ‘GP108M’ may not be NVIDIA’s own terminology, the Ubuntu Certified process involves OEMs directly working with Canonical to test their hardware. Canonical’s differentiation strongly implies that the OEMs are aware of MX150 variant.
A lot of that sounds dubious, so they know they are using a desktop variant gpu in a laptop in one case yet the actual mobile version in another and just add an s.
I like annandtech but that stinks , why would you use the desktop variant gpu, why would it then not be marketed different ,it would game different.
Sounds like someone made a laptop for reviews and one to actually sell or something , no clarity, no good.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
3,984 (1.12/day)
System Name Wut?
Processor 3900X
Motherboard ASRock Taichi X570
Cooling Water
Memory 32GB GSkill CL16 3600mhz
Video Card(s) Vega 56
Storage 2 x AData XPG 8200 Pro 1TB
Display(s) 3440 x 1440
Case Thermaltake Tower 900
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum
No one said it's a new GPU , we are saying it's a different GPU. Clock speed is enough to differentiate two products.

In reference to my post, new == different. My point is, if you remove the laptop from the equation and ran the same cooling on each one, you are going to get the same performance. nVidia is not responsible for the cooling.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,479 (3.27/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
if you remove the laptop from the equation and ran the same cooling on each one, you are going to get the same performance.

You are not going to get the same performance. They are clocked differently and have a different TDP, these are 2 different chips tuned differently from factory. Nvidia ships them this way , it has nothing to do with cooling , the OEM chooses which one to get.
 
Last edited:

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
4,664 (0.76/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 5800X3D
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse 6600 8 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
This whole thing would not exist if nVidia clearly differentiated the two chips to avoid any and all confusion, but nooooo ...

EDIT

N17S-G1-A1 // 1468 - 1531 MHz // 25 Watt TDP
N17S-LG-A1 // 936 - 1037 MHz // 10 Watt TDP

If it was me on the naming board at Nvidia it'd be MX150 and MX150LV :)

edit: or perhaps MX150 Max-Q, just to follow the current schema.

To the un-informed buyer, those two use the "same" GPU so the cheaper one is better ... right?
 
Last edited:

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,473 (4.09/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
You are not going to get the same performance. They are clocked differently and have a different TDP, these are 2 different chips tuned differently from factory. Nvidia ships them this way , it has nothing to do with cooling , the OEM chooses which one to get.

They are going to be pretty damn close. The Weaker chip boost to over 1600MHz when not overheating, according to Notebookcheck's own reviews, and the "faster" MX150 boosts to about 1700MHz. So the 30% performance decrease everyone keeps throwing around is not because of the chip itself.

This whole thing would not exist if nVidia clearly differentiated the two chips to avoid any and all confusion, but nooooo ...

Agreed, and this is the issue. They could also have just listed the minimum specs and let OEMs use the faster one if they want.

To the un-informed buyer, those two use the "same" GPU so the cheaper one is better ... right?

I know what you're going at, but ironical chances are the cheaper one would actually be better. These 13" ultrathins that the weaker chip is going in aren't cheap compared to the lower end 15" laptops the more powerful one goes into. The cheapest 13" laptop with an MX150 in it is $1,000, you can pick up a 15" with the more powerful MX150 for under $600.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2012
Messages
3,014 (0.64/day)
Location
Zagreb, Croatia
System Name Windows 10 64-bit Core i7 6700
Processor Intel Core i7 6700
Motherboard Asus Z170M-PLUS
Cooling Corsair AIO
Memory 2 x 8 GB Kingston DDR4 2666
Video Card(s) Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Storage Western Digital Caviar Blue 1 TB, Seagate Baracuda 1 TB
Display(s) Dell P2414H
Case Corsair Carbide Air 540
Audio Device(s) Realtek HD Audio
Power Supply Corsair TX v2 650W
Mouse Steelseries Sensei
Keyboard CM Storm Quickfire Pro, Cherry MX Reds
Software MS Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
if you remove the laptop from the equation and ran the same cooling on each one, you are going to get the same performance.
That's a blatant lie, however it may not be intentional so let's call it a disninformation
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2014
Messages
861 (0.24/day)

T4C Fantasy

CPU & GPU DB Maintainer
Staff member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
2,566 (0.56/day)
Location
Rhode Island
System Name Whaaaat Kiiiiiiid!
Processor Intel Core i9-12900K @ Default
Motherboard Gigabyte Z690 AORUS Elite AX
Cooling Corsair H150i AIO Cooler
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum 32GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 FTW3 ULTRA @ Default
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512GB + Crucial MX500 2TB x3 + Crucial MX500 4TB + Samsung 980 PRO 1TB
Display(s) 27" LG 27MU67-B 4K, + 27" Acer Predator XB271HU 1440P
Case Thermaltake Core X9 Snow
Audio Device(s) Logitech G935 Headset
Power Supply SeaSonic Platinum 1050W Snow Silent
Mouse Logitech G903 Lightspeed
Keyboard Logitech G915
Software Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores FFXV: 19329
This is why Intel and Via GPUs are the best, they don't rename/weaken anything.
#notmydedicatedgpu
Intel weakens more than everyone else, there is 3 or more variants to every igp all different speeds
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2017
Messages
53 (0.02/day)
I wonder why it has suddenly become trendy to criticise whatever NVIDIA does. Unlike Intel, they offer very real, tangible performance increases for each generation of its GPUs.

You are free not to buy their GPUs, since we've got AMD. AMD is not competitive at the very top but again, no one forces you to buy NVIDIA GPUs. Wait a year or two and you'll get the performance of Titan V from AMD.

Speaking of this particular news piece. Let's check some facts, e.g. visit the GeForce MX-150 web page. OMG, there are no specs there. Nothing at all. NVIDIA doesn't promise anything at all. It's not like AMD who recently completely silently downgraded some of its GPUs (RX-550?).

So, what's going on and what's all the fuss about? Or NVIDIA slandering news titles work as a click bait?
AMD has done it and there was very real outrage about it, so I don't think Nvidia is being singled out on this issue.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,473 (4.09/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
That's a blatant lie, however it may not be intentional so let's call it a disninformation

It will be a heck of a lot closer than the numbers in the original post seem to suggest. When both versions are boosting to their max, there is only about a 100MHz difference between the two.

To me, a little outrage needs to be directed towards nVidia for not properly listing the minimum specs on their website. However, the majority of the outrage should be directed at these laptop manufacturers that are putting these dedicated GPUs in machines with cooling so bad they can't even maintain the base clock for any amount of reasonable time.
 

wolf

Better Than Native
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
8,202 (1.28/day)
System Name MightyX
Processor Ryzen 9800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X650I AX
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30
Video Card(s) Asus TUF RTX3080 Deshrouded
Storage WD Black SN850X 2TB
Display(s) LG 42C2 4K OLED
Case Coolermaster NR200P
Audio Device(s) LG SN5Y / Focal Clear
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RBG Pro SE
Keyboard Glorious GMMK Compact w/pudding
VR HMD Meta Quest 3
Software case populated with Artic P12's
Benchmark Scores 4k120 OLED Gsync bliss
I wonder why it has suddenly become trendy to criticize whatever NVIDIA does.

You're kidding right? Many people, especially on this forum, have been bagging them out for years.

NVIDIA, the company that people love to hate.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2017
Messages
53 (0.02/day)
There is a lot of Nvidia hate mostly brought on by their anti competitive practices but they still have a long relationship with devoted Nvidia supporters like yourself, good on you for being their staunchest fan.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
3,984 (1.12/day)
System Name Wut?
Processor 3900X
Motherboard ASRock Taichi X570
Cooling Water
Memory 32GB GSkill CL16 3600mhz
Video Card(s) Vega 56
Storage 2 x AData XPG 8200 Pro 1TB
Display(s) 3440 x 1440
Case Thermaltake Tower 900
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum
Many people, especially on this forum, have been bagging them out for years.

They have certainly done some things to draw people's ire but this is not one of them.
 

wolf

Better Than Native
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
8,202 (1.28/day)
System Name MightyX
Processor Ryzen 9800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X650I AX
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30
Video Card(s) Asus TUF RTX3080 Deshrouded
Storage WD Black SN850X 2TB
Display(s) LG 42C2 4K OLED
Case Coolermaster NR200P
Audio Device(s) LG SN5Y / Focal Clear
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RBG Pro SE
Keyboard Glorious GMMK Compact w/pudding
VR HMD Meta Quest 3
Software case populated with Artic P12's
Benchmark Scores 4k120 OLED Gsync bliss
There is a lot of Nvidia hate mostly brought on by their anti competitive practices but they still have a long relationship with devoted Nvidia supporters like yourself, good on you for being their staunchest fan.

Case in point, this guy. Thanks for helping me make my point :)

the majority of the outrage should be directed at these laptop manufacturers that are putting these dedicated GPUs in machines with cooling so bad they can't even maintain the base clock for any amount of reasonable time.

This.
 

deu

Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
493 (0.16/day)
System Name Bo-minator (my name is bo)
Processor AMD 3900X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory G-SkiLL 2x8GB RAM 3600Mhz (CL16-16-16-16-36)
Video Card(s) ASUS STRIX 1080Ti OC
Storage Samsung EVO 850 1TB
Display(s) ACER XB271HU + DELL 2717D
Case Fractal Design Define R4
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Essence STX
Power Supply Antec HCP 1000W
Mouse G403
Keyboard CM STORM Quick Fire Rapid
Software Windows 10 64-bit Pro
Benchmark Scores XX
I think his point was that there is no specs and therefore no promised speed.

Except that there is a rough promised speed.
Supposed to be 4x UHD 620 , and the 930mx was 3x ... now with the clock changes the 930mx might actually be faster.

I agree that NVIDIA does not promise one, but this decision will utter destroy that chip. The people who are the market for the MX150 laptops likely not going to go through 10+ reviews of different laptops with MX150 and say; hmm, this one. And even if they do, choosing a lower performing MX150 laptop will bring negative association towards the chip. IMO this is a PR nightmare for the chip :D
 

Choice777

New Member
Joined
May 1, 2018
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
Quick price comparison. So top scoring MX150 is in the Acer Swift SF315 priced at £850 and the lowest scoring MX150 is in the Ideapad 320S priced at £475.

Gosh - didn't see that coming. They're very different speced systems. C'mon people - open your eyes.

Cmon people open your eyes ? The nerve. Where is this imaginary Ideapas S320 at 475 pounds when it's actually 570 pounds and that's only 50 pounds less than the proper mx150 Acer Swift 3 sf315 at 620 pounds on amazon not 850 !!! Not to mention the Swift3's better i5-7200u cpu vs shit pentium 4415u.

Now at 750 pounds reduced from 850 that's the Acer swift 3 with i7-8250u cpu which is like twice as fast as the pos pentium 4415u in the ideapad 320s around 450 pounds. 7651 passmark points vs 3190 points...that's 2.39 times faster and with a non handicapped mx 150 !!!
Lenovo don't even offer a sorting option based on gpu on their website that's how little they care about the consumer and gpu preferences.

So where is this ideapad 320s with mx150 at 475 pounds ????????

Look
https://www3.lenovo.com/gb/en/laptops/ideapad/300-series/Ideapad-320S-13/p/88IP30S0902

The only Ideapad 320s on the lenovo site shows up with ''upto mx150'' and a whole other bunch of ''up to'' like ''up to 8th gen i7'' but when you click on it and then click view models it only has one model with i3-7100u which is slightly better than pentium 4415u as it has 3800 passmark points vs 3190 in 4415u, but not even close to i5-7200u 4646 points in Acer swift 3 at 620 pounds and 4600 passmark and proper mx150. AND this Ideapad 320s has a intel HD 620 gpu.


SO AGAIN ...where's this ideapad 320s with mx150 at 475 pounds ?????
 
Top