- Joined
- Jan 8, 2017
- Messages
- 9,281 (3.32/day)
System Name | Good enough |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge |
Motherboard | ASRock B650 Pro RS |
Cooling | 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30 |
Memory | 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora |
Storage | 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB |
Display(s) | LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV |
Case | Phanteks NV7 |
Power Supply | GPS-750C |
Lemme quote this one, because i'm really trying to get into your mind
You're saying that a jump from 6-core 14nm cpu to an 8-core 10nm cpu is not sagnificant, and continue to say how amazing the jump from zen 1 to zen 2 is.
How, in your opinion different and significant the experience would be, moving from an 8-core 1700X CPU to an 8-Core "3700X" CPU?
How, in you opinion one from said 1700X to a "4700X" would be?
What are you talking about ? You asked me about 4th gen to 7th gen , both of these sported quad cores for mainstream hence not a very significant jump between the two. What does it have to do with any of that ?
And no , I don't consider Ice Lake a huge step forward either , maybe for Intel themselves it is one but not for the industry and average consumer. A 300$ 8c/16t CPU with more than decent IPC would have been a big step and we already got that from AMD. Intel is late on that front hence I am fairly unimpressed about it.