• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

PowerColor Radeon RX Vega Nano Pictured

Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Messages
454 (0.15/day)
System Name Sillicon Nightmares
Processor Intel i7 9700KF 5ghz (5.1ghz 4 core load, no avx offset), 4.7ghz ring, 1.412vcore 1.3vcio 1.264vcsa
Motherboard Asus Z390 Strix F
Cooling DEEPCOOL Gamer Storm CAPTAIN 360
Memory 2x8GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB (B-Die) 3600 14-14-14-28 1t, tRFC 220 tREFI 65535, tFAW 16, 1.545vddq
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 1060 Strix 6GB XOC, Core: 2202-2240, Vcore: 1.075v, Mem: 9818mhz (Sillicon Lottery Jackpot)
Storage Samsung 840 EVO 1TB SSD, WD Blue 1TB, Seagate 3TB, Samsung 970 Evo Plus 512GB
Display(s) BenQ XL2430 1080p 144HZ + (2) Samsung SyncMaster 913v 1280x1024 75HZ + A Shitty TV For Movies
Case Deepcool Genome ROG Edition
Audio Device(s) Bunta Sniff Speakers From The Tip Edition With Extra Kenwoods
Power Supply Corsair AX860i/Cable Mod Cables
Mouse Logitech G602 Spilled Beer Edition
Keyboard Dell KB4021
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores 13543 Firestrike (3dmark.com/fs/22336777) 601 points CPU-Z ST 37.4ns AIDA Memory
Now that is kinda cool. Hopefully a full coverage water block comes out for it.
An AIO bracket or a full cover block is the only way i see this being competitive in the same class as its bigger brothers (V56, V64). I would hope they make it with the full core enabled but i doubt it based on vegas thermals and power draw, even the Fury Nano throttled to the point where it was keeping up with the 980, not the 980ti. Its going to be close behind the 1070 is my best guess, if it had of been release way earlier we might have seen a 1060ti to compete
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,437 (3.28/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
even the Fury Nano throttled to the point where it was keeping up with the 980e

Fury Nano was just a touch slower than the Fury X and would occasionally outperform the Fury non X.

Its going to be close behind the 1070 is my best guess

Not a chance , a stock Vega 56 is well ahead of a 1070. Even with just 56 CUs and slightly lower clocks Vega Nano it's guaranteed to be at least just as fast as a 1070.

if it had of been release way earlier we might have seen a 1060ti to compete

It's irrelevant though , this card is aimed at a very specific use case.
 

T4C Fantasy

CPU & GPU DB Maintainer
Staff member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
2,566 (0.56/day)
Location
Rhode Island
System Name Whaaaat Kiiiiiiid!
Processor Intel Core i9-12900K @ Default
Motherboard Gigabyte Z690 AORUS Elite AX
Cooling Corsair H150i AIO Cooler
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum 32GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 FTW3 ULTRA @ Default
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512GB + Crucial MX500 2TB x3 + Crucial MX500 4TB + Samsung 980 PRO 1TB
Display(s) 27" LG 27MU67-B 4K, + 27" Acer Predator XB271HU 1440P
Case Thermaltake Core X9 Snow
Audio Device(s) Logitech G935 Headset
Power Supply SeaSonic Platinum 1050W Snow Silent
Mouse Logitech G903 Lightspeed
Keyboard Logitech G915
Software Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores FFXV: 19329
Fury Nano was just a touch slower than the Fury X and would occasionally outperform the Fury non X.



Not a chance , a stock Vega 56 is well ahead of a 1070. Even with just 56 CUs and slightly lower clocks Vega Nano it's guaranteed to be at least just as fast as a 1070.



It's irrelevant though , this card is aimed at a very specific use case.
Vega nano will have 64 though
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2017
Messages
54 (0.02/day)
System Name Desktop // Laptop MSI GT60 // HP Zbook 17 G2
Processor I5 10400F (soon i7 10700/F) // I7 4910MQ
Motherboard B460M Aorus Pro
Cooling Be Quiet! TF2
Memory HyperX Fury 4x8GB 2666 // 4x8GB 1600 G.SKILL RipJaws
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 3080 TUF // MXM Nvidia Quadro RTX 3000
Storage 500GB Nvme + 2x1TB SATA + 128GB M.2 SATA // 2x Intel S3510 800GB in RAID 0
Display(s) AOC G2590PX 25" 144hz 1080p // 90hz
Case MB311L with BeQuiet fans
Audio Device(s) Philips Fidelio X2HR + Geekria QuickFit Boom / some 40yo philips stereo
Power Supply Be Quiet! Pure Power 11 CM 600W
Mouse MAD GIGA G928H
Keyboard Steelseries Apex M500 (red switches)
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores Port Royal : 11406 Steel Nomad : 4437 // Time Spy : 5238 Steel Nomad 1363 Steel Nomad Light 5694
i hope it will be some vega 32 or 48
 

T4C Fantasy

CPU & GPU DB Maintainer
Staff member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
2,566 (0.56/day)
Location
Rhode Island
System Name Whaaaat Kiiiiiiid!
Processor Intel Core i9-12900K @ Default
Motherboard Gigabyte Z690 AORUS Elite AX
Cooling Corsair H150i AIO Cooler
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum 32GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 FTW3 ULTRA @ Default
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512GB + Crucial MX500 2TB x3 + Crucial MX500 4TB + Samsung 980 PRO 1TB
Display(s) 27" LG 27MU67-B 4K, + 27" Acer Predator XB271HU 1440P
Case Thermaltake Core X9 Snow
Audio Device(s) Logitech G935 Headset
Power Supply SeaSonic Platinum 1050W Snow Silent
Mouse Logitech G903 Lightspeed
Keyboard Logitech G915
Software Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores FFXV: 19329
Do you have something concrete info? According to PCGH this powercolor variant was 56 version of Vega.
Their info is based on the power connector info
They have no proof

It could be 56 but im not so sure
 
Last edited:
Top